The Effects of Paravertebral Buipivacaine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Bupivacaine-Fentanyl in Unilateral Open Renal Surgeries

R. Elsharkawy, Mohamed Nashaat Mohamed, G. Zakari, M. Othman
{"title":"The Effects of Paravertebral Buipivacaine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Bupivacaine-Fentanyl in Unilateral Open Renal Surgeries","authors":"R. Elsharkawy, Mohamed Nashaat Mohamed, G. Zakari, M. Othman","doi":"10.15226/2374-684x/5/2/00159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Objective: This trial was designed to test the benefits of adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine if compared with the bupivacainefentanyl mixture in paravertebral block for different renal surgeries. Design: Prospective randomized and double-blinded study. Setting: Operative room and postoperative recovery area. Patients: Fifty patients, ASA physical status I and II, aged above 20 years, scheduled for elective open unilateral renal surgeries (nephrectomy, pyelolithotomy and pyeloplasty). Intervention: Patients were randomly allocated by the computer generated list into 2 equal groups (each group had 25patient). Bupivacaine – dexmedetomidine (BD) group received paravertebral bupivacaine 0.2% + dexmedetomidine 1μ/kg for patient below 65 years and 0.5μ/kg for patient above 65 years in a total volume of 20 ml. Bupivacaine fentanyl (BF) group received paravertebral bupivacaine 0.2% + fentanyl 1μ/kg for patient below 65 years and fentanyl 0.5μ/kg for patient above 65 years in a total volume of 20 ml. Measurements: Pain assessed by VAS, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, Spo2, postoperative sedation, postoperative adverse effects, total requirement of opioid and first request for analgesia. Main Results: Post-operative visual analogue score and post– operative sedation score were significantly different between both groups in favor of BD group. No satistical difference between both groups as regard HR mean blood pressure and oxygen saturation. No postoperative adverse effects were recorded. Conclusions: The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in paravertebral block provides prolonged postoperative analgesia and better sedation score. Also, the addition of dexmedetomidine leads to a reduction in the usage of postoperative opioid.","PeriodicalId":74840,"journal":{"name":"SOJ anesthesiology & pain management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOJ anesthesiology & pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/2374-684x/5/2/00159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Study Objective: This trial was designed to test the benefits of adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine if compared with the bupivacainefentanyl mixture in paravertebral block for different renal surgeries. Design: Prospective randomized and double-blinded study. Setting: Operative room and postoperative recovery area. Patients: Fifty patients, ASA physical status I and II, aged above 20 years, scheduled for elective open unilateral renal surgeries (nephrectomy, pyelolithotomy and pyeloplasty). Intervention: Patients were randomly allocated by the computer generated list into 2 equal groups (each group had 25patient). Bupivacaine – dexmedetomidine (BD) group received paravertebral bupivacaine 0.2% + dexmedetomidine 1μ/kg for patient below 65 years and 0.5μ/kg for patient above 65 years in a total volume of 20 ml. Bupivacaine fentanyl (BF) group received paravertebral bupivacaine 0.2% + fentanyl 1μ/kg for patient below 65 years and fentanyl 0.5μ/kg for patient above 65 years in a total volume of 20 ml. Measurements: Pain assessed by VAS, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, Spo2, postoperative sedation, postoperative adverse effects, total requirement of opioid and first request for analgesia. Main Results: Post-operative visual analogue score and post– operative sedation score were significantly different between both groups in favor of BD group. No satistical difference between both groups as regard HR mean blood pressure and oxygen saturation. No postoperative adverse effects were recorded. Conclusions: The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in paravertebral block provides prolonged postoperative analgesia and better sedation score. Also, the addition of dexmedetomidine leads to a reduction in the usage of postoperative opioid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎旁布比卡因-右美托咪定与布比卡因-芬太尼在单侧开放性肾脏手术中的作用
研究目的:本试验旨在测试在不同肾脏手术中,将右美托咪定添加到布比卡因中与布比卡因-尼芬太尼混合物在椎旁阻滞中的益处。设计:前瞻性随机双盲研究。设置:手术室及术后恢复区。患者:50名患者,ASA身体状况I和II,年龄在20岁以上,计划进行选择性单侧开放性肾脏手术(肾切除术、肾盂切开术和肾盂成形术)。干预:通过计算机生成的列表将患者随机分为2组(每组25名患者)。布比卡因-右美托咪定(BD)组接受椎旁布比卡因0.2%+右美托咪定1μ/kg(65岁以下患者)和0.5μ/kg(六十五岁以上患者),总体积为20 ml。布比卡因芬太尼(BF)组接受脊椎旁布比卡因0.2%+芬太尼1μ/kg,65岁以下病人和芬太尼0.5μ/kg,总体积20 ml。测量:通过VAS、心率、平均动脉血压、Spo2、术后镇静、术后不良反应、阿片类药物总需求和首次镇痛要求评估疼痛。主要结果:两组术后视觉模拟评分和术后镇静评分有显著差异,BD组更为明显。两组在HR平均血压和血氧饱和度方面没有令人满意的差异。无术后不良反应记录。结论:右美托咪定与布比卡因用于椎旁阻滞可延长术后镇痛时间,提高镇静评分。此外,右美托咪定的加入可减少术后阿片类药物的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Progress in Clinical Applications of Auricular Acupuncture at the International Symposium on Auriculotherapy Held in Singapore Anesthetic Management in Neonatal Pediatric Patients with Myelomeningocele and Macrocephaly Endovenous Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patient with Autism Spectrum Disorder Undergoing General Anesthesia The Effects of Paravertebral Buipivacaine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Bupivacaine-Fentanyl in Unilateral Open Renal Surgeries A Comparison Of The Analgesic Effects Of Fentanyl And Butorphanol In African Clawed Frogs (Xenopus laevis) Under Tricaine Methanesulfonate (MS222) Anaesthesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1