The Nicaragua Protest Crisis in 2018–2019: Assessing the Logic of Government Responses to Protests

IF 1.6 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Politics in Latin America Pub Date : 2021-07-07 DOI:10.1177/1866802X211024246
Graig R. Klein, Jose Cuesta, C. Chagalj
{"title":"The Nicaragua Protest Crisis in 2018–2019: Assessing the Logic of Government Responses to Protests","authors":"Graig R. Klein, Jose Cuesta, C. Chagalj","doi":"10.1177/1866802X211024246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite constant monitoring, we lack a good explanation for the 2018–2019 protest crisis in Nicaragua. The escalation of protests, repression, duration, and the death toll are surprising. Applying a novel political and economic cost framework, we benchmark Nicaragua’s historical and recent political protests and explain the Ortega administration’s responses, thus providing a rich case (with comparative data for context) that makes sense of this extraordinary period of protest. The empirical analysis buttresses our qualitative case study of protest motivations and tactics and extreme state violence that define four phases of the conflict. The combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses creates one of the first robust studies of protest–response dynamics of this protest crisis. We conclude that these protests are unique with respect to previous protests in the country and the region and that government repression was a logical response in some phases but was inconsistently applied.","PeriodicalId":44885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Politics in Latin America","volume":"14 1","pages":"55 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1866802X211024246","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Politics in Latin America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X211024246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Despite constant monitoring, we lack a good explanation for the 2018–2019 protest crisis in Nicaragua. The escalation of protests, repression, duration, and the death toll are surprising. Applying a novel political and economic cost framework, we benchmark Nicaragua’s historical and recent political protests and explain the Ortega administration’s responses, thus providing a rich case (with comparative data for context) that makes sense of this extraordinary period of protest. The empirical analysis buttresses our qualitative case study of protest motivations and tactics and extreme state violence that define four phases of the conflict. The combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses creates one of the first robust studies of protest–response dynamics of this protest crisis. We conclude that these protests are unique with respect to previous protests in the country and the region and that government repression was a logical response in some phases but was inconsistently applied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2018-2019年尼加拉瓜抗议危机:评估政府应对抗议的逻辑
尽管持续监测,但我们对尼加拉瓜2018-2019年的抗议危机缺乏一个很好的解释。抗议升级、镇压、持续时间和死亡人数令人惊讶。运用一个新的政治和经济成本框架,我们以尼加拉瓜历史上和最近的政治抗议为基准,并解释了奥尔特加政府的反应,从而提供了一个丰富的案例(与背景的比较数据),使这一特殊时期的抗议有意义。实证分析支持了我们对抗议动机、策略和极端国家暴力的定性案例研究,这些研究定义了冲突的四个阶段。定性和定量分析的结合创造了抗议危机的抗议-反应动力学的第一个强有力的研究之一。我们的结论是,与该国和该地区以前的抗议活动相比,这些抗议活动是独特的,政府的镇压在某些阶段是合乎逻辑的反应,但并没有始终如一地实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Presidential Debates and Electoral Preferences in Weakly Institutionalised Democracies: Evidence From 32 Latin American Elections Researching the Gap: Women in Latin American Political Science Citizens’ Stability of Electoral Preferences in Chile Since the Social Upheaval Assessing Congressional Institutionalization and Political Elites’ Renewal in Latin America Through Legislative Amateurism Lessons from a Late Adopter: Feminist Advocacy, Democratizing Reforms, and Gender Quotas in Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1