Comparison between modified LST Fastfloat and conventional HF methods for pollen preparation in highly minerogenic sediments

IF 1.3 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOLOGY Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland Pub Date : 2021-06-13 DOI:10.17741/BGSF/93.1.001
Tiina Eskola, Riitta Kontio, J. Lunkka
{"title":"Comparison between modified LST Fastfloat and conventional HF methods for pollen preparation in highly minerogenic sediments","authors":"Tiina Eskola, Riitta Kontio, J. Lunkka","doi":"10.17741/BGSF/93.1.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pollen analysis is a commonly used method to interpret vegetation and environmental change. The standard pollen preparation technique in minerogenic sediments involves the use of hydrofluoric acid (HF) which is highly toxic. Currently the European legislation requires that hazardous chemicals should be substituted with less hazardous or nontoxic chemicals if possible. In the present paper the authors introduce a safer pollen preparation method, based on the use of low-toxic heavy liquid lithium hetero polytungstate (LST Fastfloat) and provide instructions for pollen preparation with the LST Fastflow method. Furthermore, five paired samples were processed from clayey and silty sediments with LST Fastfloat and conventional HF methods and the pollen and spore counting results obtained from these two methods were compared to test if there is statistically significant differences between the taxa. Calculation of the 95 % confidence interval revealed statistical agreement in all studied taxa except one taxon in one sample pair. However, the study revealed systematic differences within two taxa, Betula and Pinus. Thus caution is needed when comparing results obtained by HF and heavy liquid (LST Fastfloat) methods.","PeriodicalId":55302,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland","volume":"93 1","pages":"5-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17741/BGSF/93.1.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Pollen analysis is a commonly used method to interpret vegetation and environmental change. The standard pollen preparation technique in minerogenic sediments involves the use of hydrofluoric acid (HF) which is highly toxic. Currently the European legislation requires that hazardous chemicals should be substituted with less hazardous or nontoxic chemicals if possible. In the present paper the authors introduce a safer pollen preparation method, based on the use of low-toxic heavy liquid lithium hetero polytungstate (LST Fastfloat) and provide instructions for pollen preparation with the LST Fastflow method. Furthermore, five paired samples were processed from clayey and silty sediments with LST Fastfloat and conventional HF methods and the pollen and spore counting results obtained from these two methods were compared to test if there is statistically significant differences between the taxa. Calculation of the 95 % confidence interval revealed statistical agreement in all studied taxa except one taxon in one sample pair. However, the study revealed systematic differences within two taxa, Betula and Pinus. Thus caution is needed when comparing results obtained by HF and heavy liquid (LST Fastfloat) methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良LST-Fastfloat和传统HF方法在高成矿沉积物中制备花粉的比较
花粉分析是解释植被和环境变化的常用方法。成矿沉积物中的标准花粉制备技术包括使用剧毒的氢氟酸。目前,欧洲立法要求,如果可能的话,危险化学品应被危险性较小或无毒的化学品取代。在本文中,作者介绍了一种更安全的花粉制备方法,该方法是在使用低毒重液体异多钨酸锂(LST-Fastfloat)的基础上进行的,并为使用LST-Fastflow方法制备花粉提供了指导。此外,使用LST Fastfloat和传统HF方法从粘性和粉质沉积物中处理了五个配对样本,并对这两种方法获得的花粉和孢子计数结果进行了比较,以测试分类群之间是否存在统计学上的显著差异。95%置信区间的计算显示,除一个样本对中的一个分类单元外,所有研究分类单元的统计一致性。然而,这项研究揭示了桦树和松树这两个分类群的系统差异。因此,在比较HF和重质液体(LST-Fastfloat)方法获得的结果时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland (BGSF) publishes research articles and short communications in all branches of geosciences. Contributions from outside Finland are welcome, provided that they contain material relevant to Finnish geology or are of general interest.
期刊最新文献
The morphostratigraphic imprint of the Baltic Ice Lake drainage event in southern Finland Multiscale mapping and scaling analysis of the censored brittle structural framework within the crystalline bedrock of southern Finland Clay mineral and Nd, Pb, and Sr isotope provenance of a MIS 4-3 sediment record from the Lomonosov Ridge, central Arctic Ocean Editorial: The 3rd PalaeoArc 2022 Conference in Finland Geochemical and mineralogical characterization of mine tailings at the Rautuvaara mine site and aspects to environmental conditions and resource potential
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1