Two Peas in a Pod? Development of Twin Relationships in Light of Twins’ Temperament Differences

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL European Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2023-05-07 DOI:10.1177/08902070231171812
Hila Segal, Shifra Gutermann, A. Knafo-Noam
{"title":"Two Peas in a Pod? Development of Twin Relationships in Light of Twins’ Temperament Differences","authors":"Hila Segal, Shifra Gutermann, A. Knafo-Noam","doi":"10.1177/08902070231171812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the hypothesis that temperamental (dis)similarity is associated with twin relationship quality. In a longitudinal study that followed 322 monozygotic twins (who share close to 100% of their genes) and 1199 dizygotic twins (who on average, share 50% of their segregating genes) throughout childhood, mothers ( N = 1547) and fathers ( N = 536) reported on their twins’ relationships on at least one of four measurement points when the twins were between 3 and 8–9 years of age. Mothers also reported on the twins’ temperament. Negative associations were found between reports by both parents on the twins’ closeness and their temperament difference throughout childhood, while positive associations were found between twins’ conflict and their temperament difference in late childhood. Latent growth modeling indicated that the association between temperament differences and the twins’ mother-reported closeness was evident beyond the effect of zygosity. A different pattern was found for twin conflict: the more the twins differed in their temperament (specifically negative emotionality) with age, the more the conflict between them increased. Our findings support the hypothesis that personality similarities can contribute to positive relationships from early childhood, and vice versa, beyond the effect of genetic similarity.","PeriodicalId":51376,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Personality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231171812","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the hypothesis that temperamental (dis)similarity is associated with twin relationship quality. In a longitudinal study that followed 322 monozygotic twins (who share close to 100% of their genes) and 1199 dizygotic twins (who on average, share 50% of their segregating genes) throughout childhood, mothers ( N = 1547) and fathers ( N = 536) reported on their twins’ relationships on at least one of four measurement points when the twins were between 3 and 8–9 years of age. Mothers also reported on the twins’ temperament. Negative associations were found between reports by both parents on the twins’ closeness and their temperament difference throughout childhood, while positive associations were found between twins’ conflict and their temperament difference in late childhood. Latent growth modeling indicated that the association between temperament differences and the twins’ mother-reported closeness was evident beyond the effect of zygosity. A different pattern was found for twin conflict: the more the twins differed in their temperament (specifically negative emotionality) with age, the more the conflict between them increased. Our findings support the hypothesis that personality similarities can contribute to positive relationships from early childhood, and vice versa, beyond the effect of genetic similarity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一荚两豆?从双胞胎气质差异看双胞胎关系的发展
这项研究检验了气质(dis)相似性与双胞胎关系质量相关的假设。在一项纵向研究中,322对单卵双胞胎(他们共享接近100%的基因)和1199对双卵双胞胎(平均共享50%的分离基因)在整个儿童时期进行了跟踪调查,母亲(N=1547)和父亲(N=536)在双胞胎3至8-9岁时,报告了他们双胞胎在四个测量点中至少一个测量点的关系。母亲们还报道了这对双胞胎的气质。父母双方关于双胞胎在整个童年时期的亲密程度和气质差异的报告之间存在负相关,而双胞胎在童年晚期的冲突和气质差异之间存在正相关。潜在生长模型表明,气质差异与双胞胎母亲报告的亲密程度之间的联系明显超出了合群性的影响。双胞胎冲突有一种不同的模式:随着年龄的增长,双胞胎的气质(特别是负面情绪)差异越大,他们之间的冲突就越大。我们的研究结果支持这样一种假设,即性格相似性可以在儿童早期就促进积极的关系,反之亦然,超出了基因相似性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Personality
European Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
8.50%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: It is intended that the journal reflects all areas of current personality psychology. The Journal emphasizes (1) human individuality as manifested in cognitive processes, emotional and motivational functioning, and their physiological and genetic underpinnings, and personal ways of interacting with the environment, (2) individual differences in personality structure and dynamics, (3) studies of intelligence and interindividual differences in cognitive functioning, and (4) development of personality differences as revealed by cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
期刊最新文献
From theory to research: Interpretational guidelines, statistical guidance, and a shiny app for the model of excellencism and perfectionism The complexity of the pursuit of happiness is associated with the success of well-being related behaviors in everyday life Personality is (so much) more than just self-reported Big Five traits My willpower belief and yours: Investigating dyadic associations between willpower beliefs, social support, and relationship satisfaction in couples Between- and within-person longitudinal associations between personality traits and social support across relationships during older adulthood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1