Jigsaw: A step toward co-operative learning among medical and nursing students

Vinod Kumar C S, S. Kalasuramath, S. Reddy, R. Reddy
{"title":"Jigsaw: A step toward co-operative learning among medical and nursing students","authors":"Vinod Kumar C S, S. Kalasuramath, S. Reddy, R. Reddy","doi":"10.4103/amhs.amhs_1_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: To shift the paradigm from passive tutor driven tutorials to more responsible active learning by the students, a co operative teaching learning method could be a good alternative. The Jigsaw approach, a model of co operative learning, focuses on learning in groups with fellow learner co operation and reassures team work. Thus, this study was aimed at assessing the effectiveness of jigsaw strategy in comparison to tutorials in enhancing cognitive skills among the medical students in microbiology. Materials and Methods: A cross sectional study was carried out at microbiology department for 50 consenting MBBS students of professional year II and 50 consenting B.Sc nursing students of 2nd years. Students were randomly divided into two batches: Aand B of 25 students each. They were prepared for either a jigsaw (Experimental) or tutorial (Control) a week prior on predecided topics. The same groups were crossed over for another topic. Students' performance was assessed by pretest, posttest, academic achievement level, and retention test by prevalidated multiple choice questionnaires. The student perception on TL methods was evaluated by using learning experience questionnaires. Results: Posttest scores of both groups were found to be significant at the level of P < 0.05. Among medical students, mean of posttest scores in the jigsaw is more than tutorial (12.4 v/s 9.7, crossover 13.3 v/s 11.2) and in nursing students (11.7 v/s 8.2, crossover 11.6 v/s 9.9). Mean retention tests scores and absolute achievement level were high in jigsaw groups. The students preferred jigsaw over the tutorial. Conclusion: Jigsaw strategy is a robust instructional tool, well perceived by the students to enhance cognitive skills as inferred by the results and can be tailored to the needs of varied topics across different disciplines.","PeriodicalId":8296,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/amhs.amhs_1_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and Aim: To shift the paradigm from passive tutor driven tutorials to more responsible active learning by the students, a co operative teaching learning method could be a good alternative. The Jigsaw approach, a model of co operative learning, focuses on learning in groups with fellow learner co operation and reassures team work. Thus, this study was aimed at assessing the effectiveness of jigsaw strategy in comparison to tutorials in enhancing cognitive skills among the medical students in microbiology. Materials and Methods: A cross sectional study was carried out at microbiology department for 50 consenting MBBS students of professional year II and 50 consenting B.Sc nursing students of 2nd years. Students were randomly divided into two batches: Aand B of 25 students each. They were prepared for either a jigsaw (Experimental) or tutorial (Control) a week prior on predecided topics. The same groups were crossed over for another topic. Students' performance was assessed by pretest, posttest, academic achievement level, and retention test by prevalidated multiple choice questionnaires. The student perception on TL methods was evaluated by using learning experience questionnaires. Results: Posttest scores of both groups were found to be significant at the level of P < 0.05. Among medical students, mean of posttest scores in the jigsaw is more than tutorial (12.4 v/s 9.7, crossover 13.3 v/s 11.2) and in nursing students (11.7 v/s 8.2, crossover 11.6 v/s 9.9). Mean retention tests scores and absolute achievement level were high in jigsaw groups. The students preferred jigsaw over the tutorial. Conclusion: Jigsaw strategy is a robust instructional tool, well perceived by the students to enhance cognitive skills as inferred by the results and can be tailored to the needs of varied topics across different disciplines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拼图:医学和护理专业学生合作学习的一步
背景和目的:为了让学生从被动的导师指导转变为更负责任的主动学习,合作教学法可能是一个很好的选择。Jigsaw方法是一种合作学习模式,侧重于与同伴合作的小组学习,并保证团队合作。因此,本研究旨在评估拼图策略与教程在提高医学生微生物学认知技能方面的有效性。材料和方法:在微生物学系对50名专业二年级的MBBS学生和50名护理二年级的B.Sc学生进行了横断面研究。学生被随机分为两批:A和B,每组25名学生。他们在一周前就预先确定的主题准备了拼图(实验)或教程(对照)。同样的小组被换成了另一个话题。学生的表现通过前测、后测、学业成绩水平和保留测试通过预先验证的多项选择问卷进行评估。学生对TL方法的认知通过使用学习经验问卷进行评估。结果:两组的测试后得分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。在医学生中,拼图组的后测平均得分高于辅导组(12.4 v/s 9.7,交叉13.3 v/s 11.2)和护理生(11.7 v/s 8.2,交叉11.6 v/s 9.9)。拼图组的平均保留测试得分和绝对成就水平较高。比起教程,学生们更喜欢拼图游戏。结论:拼图策略是一种强大的教学工具,学生们很好地理解它,可以根据结果来提高认知技能,并且可以根据不同学科的不同主题的需求进行定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Blood Donor Selection Profile an Important Tool for Blood Safety: An Institutional Experience Choosing the Right Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Gender –Specific Approach A Rare Case of Dentigerous Cyst in a 1-day-old Neonate Carotid Cavernous Fistula – Radiological Features A Retrospective Study on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Adolescent Pregnancies at a Referral Hospital in Bengaluru
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1