Relationship Between Irrigation Thresholds and Potato Tuber Depth in Sandy Soil

IF 2.1 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE Frontiers in soil science Pub Date : 2022-06-29 DOI:10.3389/fsoil.2022.898618
Jean-Pascal Matteau, P. Célicourt, Elnaz Shahriarina, Philipe Letellier, Thiago Gumiere, S. Gumiere
{"title":"Relationship Between Irrigation Thresholds and Potato Tuber Depth in Sandy Soil","authors":"Jean-Pascal Matteau, P. Célicourt, Elnaz Shahriarina, Philipe Letellier, Thiago Gumiere, S. Gumiere","doi":"10.3389/fsoil.2022.898618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil disturbance resulting from tuber crop harvesting is a major threat to soil health. The depth of soil intervention is a critical factor that further strengthens the effects of such disturbance and makes harvest one of the most harmful cropping operations. In the case of potato, soil moisture is a determining factor for root and stolon development, hence, a deeper soil intervention may be required at harvest. While potato ranks as the fourth most cultivated crop worldwide, the impact of soil moisture on potato tuber vertical and horizontal distribution has received very little attention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of four soil matric potential thresholds (SMPTs; –10, –20, –30, and –45 kPa) on the spatial (vertical and horizontal) distribution of potato tubers grown in plastic containers filled with sandy soil using an X-ray computed tomography scanner. The results of the experiments conducted in a greenhouse environment suggest that the horizontal distribution of the tubers did not differ significantly across the irrigation treatments. However, a linear relationship between SMPT, and therefore irrigation threshold, and potato tuber depth was observed. In addition, the deepest tuber position was observed under the –10 kPa SMPT, while the tubers were closer to the soil surface under the –45 kPa SMPT, which could lead to a greater preponderance of tuber diseases such as late blight or greening. Thus, potato irrigation events implementing a SMPT between –20 and –30 kPa could reduce the harvest depth, hence, decreasing the negative impacts of soil disturbance on soil structural stability and soil organic carbon degradation while mitigating the impacts of disease as well as reducing fuel costs, greenhouse gas emissions, soil loss and erosion.","PeriodicalId":73107,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in soil science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in soil science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2022.898618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Soil disturbance resulting from tuber crop harvesting is a major threat to soil health. The depth of soil intervention is a critical factor that further strengthens the effects of such disturbance and makes harvest one of the most harmful cropping operations. In the case of potato, soil moisture is a determining factor for root and stolon development, hence, a deeper soil intervention may be required at harvest. While potato ranks as the fourth most cultivated crop worldwide, the impact of soil moisture on potato tuber vertical and horizontal distribution has received very little attention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of four soil matric potential thresholds (SMPTs; –10, –20, –30, and –45 kPa) on the spatial (vertical and horizontal) distribution of potato tubers grown in plastic containers filled with sandy soil using an X-ray computed tomography scanner. The results of the experiments conducted in a greenhouse environment suggest that the horizontal distribution of the tubers did not differ significantly across the irrigation treatments. However, a linear relationship between SMPT, and therefore irrigation threshold, and potato tuber depth was observed. In addition, the deepest tuber position was observed under the –10 kPa SMPT, while the tubers were closer to the soil surface under the –45 kPa SMPT, which could lead to a greater preponderance of tuber diseases such as late blight or greening. Thus, potato irrigation events implementing a SMPT between –20 and –30 kPa could reduce the harvest depth, hence, decreasing the negative impacts of soil disturbance on soil structural stability and soil organic carbon degradation while mitigating the impacts of disease as well as reducing fuel costs, greenhouse gas emissions, soil loss and erosion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙质土壤灌溉阈值与马铃薯块茎深度的关系
块茎作物收获引起的土壤扰动是土壤健康的主要威胁。土壤干预的深度是进一步加强这种干扰影响的关键因素,使收获成为最有害的种植作业之一。就马铃薯而言,土壤湿度是根和匍匐茎发育的决定因素,因此,在收获时可能需要更深的土壤干预。虽然马铃薯是世界上第四大种植作物,但土壤水分对马铃薯块茎垂直和水平分布的影响却很少受到关注。本研究的目的是评估四种土壤基质潜力阈值(SMPTs;-10、-20、-30和-45 kPa),利用x射线计算机断层扫描仪对种植在填满沙土的塑料容器中的马铃薯块茎的空间(垂直和水平)分布进行了研究。在温室环境下进行的试验结果表明,不同灌溉处理的块茎水平分布没有显著差异。然而,SMPT和灌溉阈值与马铃薯块茎深度之间存在线性关系。此外,在-10 kPa SMPT下块茎位置最深,而在-45 kPa SMPT下块茎更接近土壤表面,这可能导致块茎晚疫病或绿化等病害的更大优势。因此,实施-20 ~ -30 kPa SMPT的马铃薯灌溉事件可以减少收获深度,从而减少土壤扰动对土壤结构稳定性和土壤有机碳降解的负面影响,同时减轻病害的影响,降低燃料成本、温室气体排放、土壤流失和侵蚀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainable soil and land management: a systems-oriented overview of scientific literature Improving a regional peat thickness map using soil apparent electrical conductivity measurements at the field-scale Extended soil surface drying triggered by subsurface drip irrigation decouples carbon and nitrogen cycles and alters microbiome composition Mitigating CO2 emissions from cultivated peatlands: Efficiency of straws and wood chips applications in maintaining carbon stock in two contrasting soils The role of soil ecosystem services in the circular bioeconomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1