Determination and evaluation of EPA and DHA ethyl esters in fish oils using the TMAH transesterification method

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Food and Drug Analysis Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.38212/2224-6614.3469
Pai-Wen Wu, Ching-Hsuan Tsai, Ching-Yu Hsu, Shu-Han Chang, Y. Kao, S. Tseng, Der-Yuan Wang
{"title":"Determination and evaluation of EPA and DHA ethyl esters in fish oils using the TMAH transesterification method","authors":"Pai-Wen Wu, Ching-Hsuan Tsai, Ching-Yu Hsu, Shu-Han Chang, Y. Kao, S. Tseng, Der-Yuan Wang","doi":"10.38212/2224-6614.3469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A simple and dependable technique, known as THAM method, has been developed to detect and measure ethyl eicosapentaenoate (EE-EPA) and ethyl docosahexaenoate (EE-DHA) in encapsulated fi sh oils. This technique involves using tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) as a catalyst, followed by analysis using gas chromatography equipped with a fl ame ionization detector. Recoveries of EE-EPA and EE-DHA spiked between 5 mg/g and 20 mg/g were found to be between 90.8% and 95.2%, with coef fi cients of variation ranging from 0.2% to 2.5%, demonstrating the accuracy and precision of the technique. Additionally, its limitation of quantitation of EE-EPA and EE-DHA in fi sh oil samples was 0.2%. When compared with the direct injection method, the TMAH method yielded relative percent differences of no more than 3.8% in the amounts of ethyl esters of EPA and DHA in fi sh oil, while preventing contamination and maintaining its performance over time. Furthermore, when compared the total amounts of EPA and DHA with the boron tri fl uoride method, the relative percent differences were no more than 4.7% by the TMAH method. The advantages of using the TMAH method in distinguishing the ester forms of EPA and DHA and determining the total content of fatty acids in fi sh oils, which can provide an auxiliary check for evaluating the compliance of applications with the regulation related to the purity and form of EPA and DHA.","PeriodicalId":358,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food and Drug Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food and Drug Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.3469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A simple and dependable technique, known as THAM method, has been developed to detect and measure ethyl eicosapentaenoate (EE-EPA) and ethyl docosahexaenoate (EE-DHA) in encapsulated fi sh oils. This technique involves using tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) as a catalyst, followed by analysis using gas chromatography equipped with a fl ame ionization detector. Recoveries of EE-EPA and EE-DHA spiked between 5 mg/g and 20 mg/g were found to be between 90.8% and 95.2%, with coef fi cients of variation ranging from 0.2% to 2.5%, demonstrating the accuracy and precision of the technique. Additionally, its limitation of quantitation of EE-EPA and EE-DHA in fi sh oil samples was 0.2%. When compared with the direct injection method, the TMAH method yielded relative percent differences of no more than 3.8% in the amounts of ethyl esters of EPA and DHA in fi sh oil, while preventing contamination and maintaining its performance over time. Furthermore, when compared the total amounts of EPA and DHA with the boron tri fl uoride method, the relative percent differences were no more than 4.7% by the TMAH method. The advantages of using the TMAH method in distinguishing the ester forms of EPA and DHA and determining the total content of fatty acids in fi sh oils, which can provide an auxiliary check for evaluating the compliance of applications with the regulation related to the purity and form of EPA and DHA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TMAH酯交换法测定和评价鱼油中的EPA和DHA乙酯
建立了一种简单可靠的方法,即THAM法,用于检测和测定胶囊鱼油中的二十碳五烯酸乙酯(EE-EPA)和二十二碳六烯酸乙酯(EE-DHA)。该技术包括使用四甲基氢氧化铵(TMAH)作为催化剂,然后使用配备火焰电离检测器的气相色谱法进行分析。在5 ~ 20 mg/g范围内,回收率为90.8% ~ 95.2%,变异系数为0.2% ~ 2.5%,证明了该技术的准确性和精密度。鱼油样品中EE-EPA和EE-DHA的定量限为0.2%。与直接注射法相比,TMAH法在鱼油中EPA和DHA乙酯含量的相对百分比差异不超过3.8%,同时可以防止污染并保持其长期性能。此外,当与三氟化硼法比较EPA和DHA总量时,TMAH法的相对百分比差异不超过4.7%。TMAH法在区分EPA和DHA的酯形式和测定鱼油中脂肪酸的总含量方面的优点,可以为评估应用产品是否符合EPA和DHA纯度和形式相关法规提供辅助检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food and Drug Analysis
Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 医学-食品科技
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
36
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to provide an international platform for scientists, researchers and academicians to promote, share and discuss new findings, current issues, and developments in the different areas of food and drug analysis. The scope of the Journal includes analytical methodologies and biological activities in relation to food, drugs, cosmetics and traditional Chinese medicine, as well as related disciplines of topical interest to public health professionals.
期刊最新文献
An acute herb-drug interaction of Magnoliae Officinalis Cortex with methotrexate via inhibiting multidrug resistance-associated protein 2. An auxiliary strategy of partial least squares regression in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies: A case of application of guhong injection in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion rats. Application and effectiveness of artificial intelligence for the border management of imported frozen fish in Taiwan. Effect of Indian gooseberry extract on improving methylglyoxal-associated leptin resistance in peripheral tissues of high-fat diet-fed rats. Ionizable copolymer functionalized magnetic nanocomposite as an adsorbent for boosting the extraction selectivity of aristolochic acids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1