The ‘Merchant Schism’ in Breslau: A Chris- tian-Jewish Conflict and the Construction of the Exchange Building in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI:10.12775/aph.2019.120.04
Agnieszka Zabłocka-Kos
{"title":"The ‘Merchant Schism’ in Breslau: A Chris- tian-Jewish Conflict and the Construction of the Exchange Building in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century","authors":"Agnieszka Zabłocka-Kos","doi":"10.12775/aph.2019.120.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to interpret the dispute between Christian and Jewish merchants that took place in Breslau (today, Wroclaw in Poland) in the first half of the nineteenth century. The dispute arose in the eighteenth century and severely deepened after the reforms designed by Heinrich Friedrich Karl vom und zum Stein and Karl August von Hardenberg were being introduced in Prussia since 1807. Among other aspects, the conflict revolved around the rapid development of the local Jewish religious community and the fast expansion of its steam-gathering economic elite. The development of Silesian trade, with an enormous role of Jews in it, was accompanied by continuous attempts at regaining the Eastern markets, partly lost after Prussia annexed Silesia in 1740 as well as resulting from the decisions of the 1815 Vienna Congress. In order to restore Breslau as an intermediary in trade between the West and the East and make it an important stock-exchange hub, collective action was a must. However, conflicts between merchants of different religions, including keeping the Jewish merchants off the local exchange, obstructed the design. The dispute was partly averted when a Chamber of Commerce was set up in Breslau in 1849. However, only the gradual quitting by the Christian merchants, members of the merchant corporation, of their privileged position in the organisation of local trade gave way to a compromise. The construction in 1864–7 of a common ‘exchange’ can be perceived as epitomising the completion of a centuries-long dispute. The monumental edifice, the largest and the showiest of all exchange buildings east of Berlin at the time, testified to high aspirations of Breslavian economic circles and their keen willingness to develop trading business far beyond the then-frontier of the state.","PeriodicalId":42490,"journal":{"name":"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA","volume":"120 1","pages":"79-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/aph.2019.120.04","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article seeks to interpret the dispute between Christian and Jewish merchants that took place in Breslau (today, Wroclaw in Poland) in the first half of the nineteenth century. The dispute arose in the eighteenth century and severely deepened after the reforms designed by Heinrich Friedrich Karl vom und zum Stein and Karl August von Hardenberg were being introduced in Prussia since 1807. Among other aspects, the conflict revolved around the rapid development of the local Jewish religious community and the fast expansion of its steam-gathering economic elite. The development of Silesian trade, with an enormous role of Jews in it, was accompanied by continuous attempts at regaining the Eastern markets, partly lost after Prussia annexed Silesia in 1740 as well as resulting from the decisions of the 1815 Vienna Congress. In order to restore Breslau as an intermediary in trade between the West and the East and make it an important stock-exchange hub, collective action was a must. However, conflicts between merchants of different religions, including keeping the Jewish merchants off the local exchange, obstructed the design. The dispute was partly averted when a Chamber of Commerce was set up in Breslau in 1849. However, only the gradual quitting by the Christian merchants, members of the merchant corporation, of their privileged position in the organisation of local trade gave way to a compromise. The construction in 1864–7 of a common ‘exchange’ can be perceived as epitomising the completion of a centuries-long dispute. The monumental edifice, the largest and the showiest of all exchange buildings east of Berlin at the time, testified to high aspirations of Breslavian economic circles and their keen willingness to develop trading business far beyond the then-frontier of the state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布雷斯劳的“商人分裂”:19世纪上半叶克里斯-犹太冲突与交易所大厦的建设
本文试图解释19世纪上半叶发生在布雷斯劳(今波兰弗罗茨瓦夫)的基督徒和犹太商人之间的争端。这场争论始于18世纪,并在1807年普鲁士引入由海因里希·弗里德里希·卡尔·冯·祖姆·施泰因和卡尔·奥古斯特·冯·哈登堡设计的改革后严重深化。在其他方面,冲突围绕着当地犹太宗教社区的快速发展和其蒸汽聚集的经济精英的快速扩张。随着西里西亚贸易的发展,犹太人在其中发挥了巨大的作用,伴随着重新获得东方市场的不断尝试,这些市场在1740年普鲁士吞并西里西亚之后以及1815年维也纳会议的决定中部分失去。为了恢复布雷斯劳作为东西方贸易中介的地位,并使其成为重要的证券交易中心,必须采取集体行动。然而,不同宗教的商人之间的冲突,包括阻止犹太商人参与当地的交易,阻碍了设计。1849年,在布雷斯劳成立了商会,这在一定程度上避免了争议。然而,只有基督教商人,商人公司的成员,逐渐放弃他们在当地贸易组织中的特权地位,才让位于妥协。1864 - 1867年共同“交换”的建设可以被视为长达几个世纪的争端结束的缩影。这座不朽的大厦是当时柏林以东所有交易所建筑中最大、最引人注目的,它证明了布列斯拉维亚经济界的远大抱负,以及他们在当时的国家边界之外发展贸易业务的热切意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Półrocznik redagowany przez zespół pracowników naukowych Instytutu Historii PAN (do tomu 99 red. Maria Bogucka, od tomu 100 red. Halina Manikowska). Ceny numerów archiwalnych aktualizowane są na bieżąco.
期刊最新文献
Heritage Without Heirs: The German Legacy in Serbia. The Case of the Museum of Danube Swabians The Polish Catholic Church and the Public Memory of the Shoah: Between Mnemonic Backlash and Settling Accounts with the Past Jewish Autobiographical Writing. Memoirs of Moses Vasertsug (c. 1760–1832) Third War of Independence? The Anti-Colonial Dynamics of Ukraine’s Politics of Memory after 2014 on the Example of the National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War in Kyiv Peripheral (Non)Polishnesses. Museums, Creeping Conflicts, and Transformative Frictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1