The interrelations between micro-level CSR, Job engagement and organizational engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: A PLSpredict model assessment

IF 1.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT Human systems management Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI:10.3233/hsm-220086
M.P Low, M. Memon
{"title":"The interrelations between micro-level CSR, Job engagement and organizational engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: A PLSpredict model assessment","authors":"M.P Low, M. Memon","doi":"10.3233/hsm-220086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Amid the mounting COVID-19 situation, we take up the opportunity to examine micro-level CSR practices as an internal strategic approach for employees’ engagement to assist organizational resiliency. Past research had documented the Matthew effects of engaged employees and the fatal threat of disengaged employees. However, little is known to the precise outcome of job engagement and organizational engagement. OBJECTIVE: This study endeavors to offer comprehensive findings on job engagement and organizational engagement through the antecedent of micro-level CSR practices. Additionally, job engagement was modelled as the mediator between micro-level CSR practices and organizational engagement. Stakeholder Theory, Social Exchange Theory and Engagement Theory guided the development of the hypotheses. METHODS: Quantitative judgmental sampling technique was employed to reach out to the targeted respondents. A total of 336 responses was collected for statistical analysis facilitated by partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach. RESULTS: The study revealed that employees’ involvement and working environment are positively influencing job engagement and organizational engagement while the others micro-level CSR practices demonstrated mixed results. Also, job engagement was found to mediate the relationships between the four dimensions of micro-level CSR practices (i.e., employees’ involvement, employees’ empowerment, work-life balance and working environment) and organizational engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Micro-level CSR practices positively affecting job engagement and organizational engagement with different degree of influences. Organizations could consider implementing micro-level CSR practices for enhanced job engagement and organizational engagement to ease the challenging moment during uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":13113,"journal":{"name":"Human systems management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human systems management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/hsm-220086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amid the mounting COVID-19 situation, we take up the opportunity to examine micro-level CSR practices as an internal strategic approach for employees’ engagement to assist organizational resiliency. Past research had documented the Matthew effects of engaged employees and the fatal threat of disengaged employees. However, little is known to the precise outcome of job engagement and organizational engagement. OBJECTIVE: This study endeavors to offer comprehensive findings on job engagement and organizational engagement through the antecedent of micro-level CSR practices. Additionally, job engagement was modelled as the mediator between micro-level CSR practices and organizational engagement. Stakeholder Theory, Social Exchange Theory and Engagement Theory guided the development of the hypotheses. METHODS: Quantitative judgmental sampling technique was employed to reach out to the targeted respondents. A total of 336 responses was collected for statistical analysis facilitated by partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach. RESULTS: The study revealed that employees’ involvement and working environment are positively influencing job engagement and organizational engagement while the others micro-level CSR practices demonstrated mixed results. Also, job engagement was found to mediate the relationships between the four dimensions of micro-level CSR practices (i.e., employees’ involvement, employees’ empowerment, work-life balance and working environment) and organizational engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Micro-level CSR practices positively affecting job engagement and organizational engagement with different degree of influences. Organizations could consider implementing micro-level CSR practices for enhanced job engagement and organizational engagement to ease the challenging moment during uncertainty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行期间微观企业社会责任、工作参与和组织参与之间的相互关系:PLSpredict模型评估
背景:在新冠肺炎形势日益严峻的情况下,我们抓住机会研究微观企业社会责任实践,将其作为员工参与的内部战略方法,以帮助组织恢复力。过去的研究记录了敬业员工的马太效应和离职员工的致命威胁。然而,人们对工作参与和组织参与的确切结果知之甚少。目的:本研究试图通过微观层面的企业社会责任实践,提供关于工作参与和组织参与的全面研究结果。此外,工作参与被建模为微观企业社会责任实践和组织参与之间的中介。利益相关者理论、社会交换理论和参与理论指导了这些假设的发展。方法:采用定量判断抽样技术,对被调查者进行调查。通过偏最小二乘结构方程建模(PLS-SEM)方法,共收集了336个响应进行统计分析。结果:研究表明,员工的参与度和工作环境对工作参与度和组织参与度有积极影响,而其他微观层面的企业社会责任实践则表现出喜忧参半的结果。此外,工作参与被发现在微观层面的企业社会责任实践的四个维度(即员工参与、员工赋权、工作与生活平衡和工作环境)与组织参与之间起中介作用。结论:微观层面的企业社会责任实践对工作参与度和组织参与度有不同程度的正向影响。组织可以考虑实施微观层面的企业社会责任实践,以提高工作参与度和组织参与度,缓解不确定性中的挑战时刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
30.40%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Human Systems Management (HSM) is an interdisciplinary, international, refereed journal, offering applicable, scientific insight into reinventing business, civil-society and government organizations, through the sustainable development of high-technology processes and structures. Adhering to the highest civic, ethical and moral ideals, the journal promotes the emerging anthropocentric-sociocentric paradigm of societal human systems, rather than the pervasively mechanistic and organismic or medieval corporatism views of humankind’s recent past. Intentionality and scope Their management autonomy, capability, culture, mastery, processes, purposefulness, skills, structure and technology often determine which human organizations truly are societal systems, while others are not. HSM seeks to help transform human organizations into true societal systems, free of bureaucratic ills, along two essential, inseparable, yet complementary aspects of modern management: a) the management of societal human systems: the mastery, science and technology of management, including self management, striving for strategic, business and functional effectiveness, efficiency and productivity, through high quality and high technology, i.e., the capabilities and competences that only truly societal human systems create and use, and b) the societal human systems management: the enabling of human beings to form creative teams, communities and societies through autonomy, mastery and purposefulness, on both a personal and a collegial level, while catalyzing people’s creative, inventive and innovative potential, as people participate in corporate-, business- and functional-level decisions. Appreciably large is the gulf between the innovative ideas that world-class societal human systems create and use, and what some conventional business journals offer. The latter often pertain to already refuted practices, while outmoded business-school curricula reinforce this problematic situation.
期刊最新文献
The role of organizational antecedents in fostering accounting intelligence adoption: The mediating influence of organizational culture The impact of digital transformation on big data analytics and firm’s sustainability performance in a post-pandemic era Principles for facial recognition technology: A content analysis of ethical guidance in the United States Work-life balance of university teachers after two years of telework during the COVID-19 pandemic Mediating role of organizational trust between transformational leadership and workplace deviant behavior of employees in banking sector of Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1