Reply to the Critics of Russian Radical 2.0: Defining Issues

Q1 Arts and Humanities The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Pub Date : 2017-12-02 DOI:10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0306
Roger E. Bissell
{"title":"Reply to the Critics of Russian Radical 2.0: Defining Issues","authors":"Roger E. Bissell","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The author assures readers that Chris Matthew Sciabarra has met all Aristotelian (if not Objectivist) requirements in full, providing not one but two definitions of \"dialectics,\" which, as the art of context-keeping, is indeed an essential part of Ayn Rand's philosophical method. He shows how Sciabarra's definitional process compares quite favorably in terms of timeliness, transparency, and benevolence to that of Rand and other Objectivists, and notes that Sciabarra's overriding concern, notwithstanding his obvious great respect for Rand's substantive philosophical achievements, has been to identify and clarify the methods she and other thinkers have used to profound benefit.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT:The author assures readers that Chris Matthew Sciabarra has met all Aristotelian (if not Objectivist) requirements in full, providing not one but two definitions of "dialectics," which, as the art of context-keeping, is indeed an essential part of Ayn Rand's philosophical method. He shows how Sciabarra's definitional process compares quite favorably in terms of timeliness, transparency, and benevolence to that of Rand and other Objectivists, and notes that Sciabarra's overriding concern, notwithstanding his obvious great respect for Rand's substantive philosophical achievements, has been to identify and clarify the methods she and other thinkers have used to profound benefit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回复对俄罗斯激进主义2.0的批评:定义问题
摘要:作者向读者保证,克里斯·马修·夏巴拉完全符合亚里士多德(如果不是客观主义的话)的所有要求,并为“辩证法”提供了不是一个而是两个定义,辩证法作为一门保持语境的艺术,确实是安·兰德哲学方法的重要组成部分。他展示了西阿巴拉的定义过程如何在及时性、透明度和仁慈性方面与兰德和其他客观主义者的定义过程相比较,并指出,尽管西阿巴拉对兰德的实质性哲学成就表现出极大的尊重,但他最关心的是确定和澄清兰德和其他思想家所使用的方法,这些方法带来了深远的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies
The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation has entered into an electronic licensing relationship with EBSCO Publishing, the world"s most prolific aggregator of full-text journals, magazines, and other sources. The full text of The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies can be found on EBSCO Publishing"s databases. A nonpartisan journal devoted to the study of Ayn Rand and her times. The journal is not aligned with any advocacy group, institute, or person. It welcomes papers from every discipline and from a variety of interpretive and critical perspectives. It aims to foster scholarly dialogue through a respectful exchange of ideas. The journal is published semi-annually, in the fall and the spring.
期刊最新文献
On Grounding Ethical Values in the Human Life Form Ayn Rand's Years in the Stoyunin Gymnasium Epistemology According to Rand and Hayek Ayn Rand's Novel Contribution: Aristotelian Liberalism Ayn Rand, Fascism, and Dystopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1