What is the real power of incumbents? Case study on the Czech Republic

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Competition and Regulation in Network Industries Pub Date : 2023-01-29 DOI:10.1177/17835917231153063
Jakub Chini, Martin Kvizda, Ondřej Špetík
{"title":"What is the real power of incumbents? Case study on the Czech Republic","authors":"Jakub Chini, Martin Kvizda, Ondřej Špetík","doi":"10.1177/17835917231153063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After an introduction of competition due to liberalisation, there is an expectation of lower prices and better quality. However, these overall positive effects could be also driven by the incumbent’s incentive to exclude competition within the liberalised markets. Such a situation occurred on the Prague-Ostrava line where liberalisation brought lower prices and an increase in quality. However, it also brought multiple accusations by both the Czech competition authority and the European Commission of the state-owned incumbent, České dráhy, that it had engaged in predatory pricing. This paper then assesses whether the price decreases within this line were driven by actual competition or by predatory behaviour of České dráhy by analysing the position of České dráhy. The aim of this paper therefore is to assess the real market power of the Czech state incumbent, České dráhy, on the Prague-Ostrava line. To achieve this aim, we used unique data we had gathered from our previous research (such as price development, market shares and customer behaviour). Our results then show that it is unlikely that České dráhy could have acted independently of its competitors and customers, which indicates that it could not have had a dominant position.","PeriodicalId":38329,"journal":{"name":"Competition and Regulation in Network Industries","volume":"24 1","pages":"24 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition and Regulation in Network Industries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917231153063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After an introduction of competition due to liberalisation, there is an expectation of lower prices and better quality. However, these overall positive effects could be also driven by the incumbent’s incentive to exclude competition within the liberalised markets. Such a situation occurred on the Prague-Ostrava line where liberalisation brought lower prices and an increase in quality. However, it also brought multiple accusations by both the Czech competition authority and the European Commission of the state-owned incumbent, České dráhy, that it had engaged in predatory pricing. This paper then assesses whether the price decreases within this line were driven by actual competition or by predatory behaviour of České dráhy by analysing the position of České dráhy. The aim of this paper therefore is to assess the real market power of the Czech state incumbent, České dráhy, on the Prague-Ostrava line. To achieve this aim, we used unique data we had gathered from our previous research (such as price development, market shares and customer behaviour). Our results then show that it is unlikely that České dráhy could have acted independently of its competitors and customers, which indicates that it could not have had a dominant position.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现任者的真正权力是什么?捷克共和国案例研究
在由于自由化而引入竞争之后,人们期望价格更低、质量更好。然而,这些总体积极影响也可能是由现任者在自由化市场中排除竞争的动机所驱动的。这种情况发生在布拉格-俄斯特拉发线,那里的自由化带来了更低的价格和质量的提高。然而,捷克竞争管理局和欧盟委员会也多次指控国有现任总统Českédráhy参与掠夺性定价。然后,本文通过分析Českédráhy的立场,评估了这一范围内的价格下跌是由实际竞争还是由Čescédrá的掠夺行为驱动的。因此,本文的目的是评估捷克现任总统Českédráhy在布拉格-俄斯特拉发线上的实际市场力量。为了实现这一目标,我们使用了从之前的研究中收集的独特数据(如价格发展、市场份额和客户行为)。我们的结果表明,Českédráhy不太可能独立于竞争对手和客户行事,这表明它不可能占据主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Regulatory lag, efficiency, and performance. Lessons from a case study Legal and ownership unbundling in the Turkish natural gas market: A comparative analysis Network utility price regulation in Australia in the pre-first world war years Canal of Nuck Endometrioma: An Uncommon Site of a Common Pathology. Experimenting with co-ownership of energy storage facilities - A case study of the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1