Coblation Assisted Adenoidectomy vs. Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy: A Comparative Study

IF 0.1 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.3329/bjo.v28i2.64295
Md. Ashraful Islam, Md Mashiur Rahman, Nazmul Hossain Choudhury, A. Rahman, F. Milki, M. K. Arefin
{"title":"Coblation Assisted Adenoidectomy vs. Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy: A Comparative Study","authors":"Md. Ashraful Islam, Md Mashiur Rahman, Nazmul Hossain Choudhury, A. Rahman, F. Milki, M. K. Arefin","doi":"10.3329/bjo.v28i2.64295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Adenoid is a patch of tissue that is situated high up in the throat and just behind the nose in the nasopharynx. Adenoid along with the tonsils, is a part of the lymphatic system that clears away infection and keeps body fluids in balance.Whenever, adenoid become enlarged, seriously infected or causes certain complications, adenoidectomy becomes essential. It can be performed with many ways includingcoblation assisted adenoidectomy and conventional curettage adenoidectomy. \nAim of the study: The aim ofthis study was to assessthe advantages of coblation assisted adenoidectomy over conventional curettage adenoidectomy. \nMethods: This comparative observational study was conducted in the Department of ENT, Bangladesh Medical College Hospital and Popular Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh during the period from July 2019 to June 2022. A total of 100 admitted patients for adenoidectomy were included as the study. All the participants were divided in two groups. In Conventional group, there were 50 participants selected for conventional curettage adenoidectomy.On the other hand, in coblation group, other 50 participants selected for coblation assisted adenoidectomy. For comparison of both the method all necessary data along with demographic and clinical status were collected in a predesigned questioner. All data were processed and analyzed and disseminated by using MS Office and SPSS version 23 programs as per need. \nResults: In this study, as the superiority of coblation assisted adenoidectomy over conventional curettage adenoidectomy we found significantly lower ‘intra operative blood loss in ml (7.58±3.28 ml)’, ‘post-operative bleeding (0%)’, presence of residual lymphoid tissue (8%)’, ‘days with analgesics (10.42±3.60 days), ‘post operative adenoid grading (0.0±0.0)’, ‘rate of recurrence (20%)’ and ‘needed days for recovery (4.68±2.17 days)’ among coblation group patients than that among conventional group patients. \nConclusion: Coblation assisted adenoidectomy ensures more easier and specific treatment for the patient. As per the findings of this study we can conclude that, considering the attractive features like lower intra operative and post-operative blood loss, presence of residual lymphoid tissue, days with analgesics, post operative adenoid grading, rate of recurrence and needed days for recovery coblation assisted adenoidectomy may be considered as the method of choice for such treatment. \nBangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 28(2): 128-134","PeriodicalId":53915,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v28i2.64295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adenoid is a patch of tissue that is situated high up in the throat and just behind the nose in the nasopharynx. Adenoid along with the tonsils, is a part of the lymphatic system that clears away infection and keeps body fluids in balance.Whenever, adenoid become enlarged, seriously infected or causes certain complications, adenoidectomy becomes essential. It can be performed with many ways includingcoblation assisted adenoidectomy and conventional curettage adenoidectomy. Aim of the study: The aim ofthis study was to assessthe advantages of coblation assisted adenoidectomy over conventional curettage adenoidectomy. Methods: This comparative observational study was conducted in the Department of ENT, Bangladesh Medical College Hospital and Popular Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh during the period from July 2019 to June 2022. A total of 100 admitted patients for adenoidectomy were included as the study. All the participants were divided in two groups. In Conventional group, there were 50 participants selected for conventional curettage adenoidectomy.On the other hand, in coblation group, other 50 participants selected for coblation assisted adenoidectomy. For comparison of both the method all necessary data along with demographic and clinical status were collected in a predesigned questioner. All data were processed and analyzed and disseminated by using MS Office and SPSS version 23 programs as per need. Results: In this study, as the superiority of coblation assisted adenoidectomy over conventional curettage adenoidectomy we found significantly lower ‘intra operative blood loss in ml (7.58±3.28 ml)’, ‘post-operative bleeding (0%)’, presence of residual lymphoid tissue (8%)’, ‘days with analgesics (10.42±3.60 days), ‘post operative adenoid grading (0.0±0.0)’, ‘rate of recurrence (20%)’ and ‘needed days for recovery (4.68±2.17 days)’ among coblation group patients than that among conventional group patients. Conclusion: Coblation assisted adenoidectomy ensures more easier and specific treatment for the patient. As per the findings of this study we can conclude that, considering the attractive features like lower intra operative and post-operative blood loss, presence of residual lymphoid tissue, days with analgesics, post operative adenoid grading, rate of recurrence and needed days for recovery coblation assisted adenoidectomy may be considered as the method of choice for such treatment. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 28(2): 128-134
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消融辅助腺样体切除术与传统刮除腺样体切除术的比较研究
背景:腺样体是一块组织,位于喉咙的高处,鼻咽部的鼻子后面。腺样体和扁桃体是淋巴系统的一部分,可以清除感染,保持体液平衡。每当腺样体变大、严重感染或引起某些并发症时,腺样体切除术就必不可少。治疗方法有多种,包括消融辅助腺样体切除术和常规刮除腺样体切除术。研究目的:本研究的目的是评估消融辅助腺样体切除术相对于传统刮除腺样体切除术的优势。方法:本比较观察研究于2019年7月至2022年6月在孟加拉国医学院医院和人民医学院医院耳鼻喉科进行。共纳入100例腺样体切除术住院患者作为研究对象。所有的参与者被分成两组。常规组选择50例患者行常规刮除腺样体切除术。另一方面,在消融组,其他50名参与者选择消融辅助腺样体切除术。为了比较这两种方法,所有必要的数据以及人口统计和临床状况都收集在一个预先设计的问题中。根据需要使用MS Office和SPSS 23版软件对所有数据进行处理、分析和传播。结果:在本研究中,由于消融辅助腺样体切除术优于传统刮除腺样体切除术,我们发现术中失血量(7.58±3.28 ml)、术后出血(0%)、残留淋巴组织(8%)、使用镇痛药天数(10.42±3.60天)、术后腺样体分级(0.0±0.0)、治疗组患者的复发率(20%)和恢复所需天数(4.68±2.17天)高于常规组。结论:消融辅助腺样体切除术使患者的治疗更容易、更有针对性。根据本研究的结果,我们可以得出结论,考虑到术中术后出血量少、淋巴组织残留、镇痛天数、术后腺样体分级、复发率和恢复所需天数等吸引人的特点,消融辅助腺样体切除术可以被认为是这种治疗的首选方法。孟加拉国[J] otorhinolyngol 2022;28 (2): 128 - 134
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Recurrence in Early Tongue Cancer T1 or T2 with or Without Neck Dissection A Case of Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcemia Comparative Study of Temporalis Fascial Graft Medial or Lateral to Handle of Malleus in Tympanoplasty Pathophysiological Effect of Enlarged Adenoid on Middle Ear in Children Repair of Surgical Defect by Pectoralis Major Flap Versus Free Radial Forearm Flap in Buccal Carcinoma: Assessment of Quality of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1