Una medida global de gobierno abierto para la OCDE. Recomendaciones para España

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Trimestre Economico Pub Date : 2021-01-04 DOI:10.20430/ete.v88i349.907
Nicolás Gonzálvez-Gallego, Laura Nieto-Torrejón, María Concepción Pérez-Cárceles
{"title":"Una medida global de gobierno abierto para la OCDE. Recomendaciones para España","authors":"Nicolás Gonzálvez-Gallego, Laura Nieto-Torrejón, María Concepción Pérez-Cárceles","doi":"10.20430/ete.v88i349.907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different international organizations and national governments are promoting the adoption of open government strategies. There are rankings to measure the evolution of some of its dimensions, but there is a gap of indicators comprising open data, transparency, participation and collaboration simultaneously. In this paper we propose the Open Government and Participation Index (OGPI), based on previous academic works, to compare open government strategies over time and among different countries. The index, which weighs different open government dimensions, is built for a sample of 33 member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) from open and consistent sources. The results show that the areas of transparency and open data have a wide room for improvement and that participation and collaboration strategies require an autonomous approach. By region, open government is more developed in the Commonwealth countries, while those in Eastern Europe present the lowest level of implementation.","PeriodicalId":44464,"journal":{"name":"Trimestre Economico","volume":"88 1","pages":"219-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trimestre Economico","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20430/ete.v88i349.907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Different international organizations and national governments are promoting the adoption of open government strategies. There are rankings to measure the evolution of some of its dimensions, but there is a gap of indicators comprising open data, transparency, participation and collaboration simultaneously. In this paper we propose the Open Government and Participation Index (OGPI), based on previous academic works, to compare open government strategies over time and among different countries. The index, which weighs different open government dimensions, is built for a sample of 33 member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) from open and consistent sources. The results show that the areas of transparency and open data have a wide room for improvement and that participation and collaboration strategies require an autonomous approach. By region, open government is more developed in the Commonwealth countries, while those in Eastern Europe present the lowest level of implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经合组织的全球公开政府措施。对西班牙的建议
不同的国际组织和国家政府正在推动采用开放的政府战略。有一些排名可以衡量其某些维度的演变,但同时包括开放数据、透明度、参与和合作在内的指标存在差距。在本文中,我们在先前学术著作的基础上提出了开放政府和参与指数(OGPI),以比较不同国家和不同时期的开放政府战略。该指数衡量了不同的开放政府层面,是为经济合作与发展组织(OECD)33个成员国的样本建立的,来源公开且一致。结果表明,透明度和开放数据领域有很大的改进空间,参与和合作战略需要自主的方法。按地区划分,开放政府在英联邦国家更为发达,而东欧国家的实施水平最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trimestre Economico
Trimestre Economico ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
La soberanía monetaria en Colombia. Análisis político-económico, 1991-2021 Transición hegemónica y progresismo: ¿es posible lograr cambios estructurales? Frente invertido: un análisis comparado Brasil-México de la gestión económica y sanitaria de la covid-19 El efecto de duplicar el salario mínimo en la brecha de género en empleo y salarios en México Bunching: una revisión
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1