Civil Law in Indonesia and Russia: Easy and Affordable Access to Legal Aid

Margareth Theresia, Septhian Eka Adiyatma, R.A. Nidha Nadia
{"title":"Civil Law in Indonesia and Russia: Easy and Affordable Access to Legal Aid","authors":"Margareth Theresia, Septhian Eka Adiyatma, R.A. Nidha Nadia","doi":"10.15294/jllr.v4i2.68099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most familiar legal systems in the world are the civil law system and common law system. The difference in characteristics between the two is an interesting discussion that is often undertaken. Research conducted on the characteristics of a legal system aims to obtain good legal institutions to regulate society. The implementation of the legal system in each country is strongly influenced by the historical developments and formation of that country. The two countries that we are interested in studying are Indonesia and Russia, as a material for comparison in terms of legal regulations, specifically in the legal aid process for their respective citizens. As a continental European adhering country, or commonly known as a civil law system, Indonesia prioritizes laws that come from formal legal sources such as laws and regulations, customs, and jurisprudence. Legal comparisons relating to legal aid in two different countries are very interesting because based on the history of the formation of the Indonesian state and the Russian state, there is a significant difference. As the two countries were colonies, they produced regulations that followed the countries that colonized them. However, the Russian state differs from the Indonesian state in that it also participated in colonizing other countries.","PeriodicalId":33754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Legal Reform","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Legal Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i2.68099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most familiar legal systems in the world are the civil law system and common law system. The difference in characteristics between the two is an interesting discussion that is often undertaken. Research conducted on the characteristics of a legal system aims to obtain good legal institutions to regulate society. The implementation of the legal system in each country is strongly influenced by the historical developments and formation of that country. The two countries that we are interested in studying are Indonesia and Russia, as a material for comparison in terms of legal regulations, specifically in the legal aid process for their respective citizens. As a continental European adhering country, or commonly known as a civil law system, Indonesia prioritizes laws that come from formal legal sources such as laws and regulations, customs, and jurisprudence. Legal comparisons relating to legal aid in two different countries are very interesting because based on the history of the formation of the Indonesian state and the Russian state, there is a significant difference. As the two countries were colonies, they produced regulations that followed the countries that colonized them. However, the Russian state differs from the Indonesian state in that it also participated in colonizing other countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚和俄罗斯的民法:获得法律援助的便利和负担得起
世界上最熟悉的法律制度之一是大陆法系和普通法系。两者之间的特征差异是一个经常进行的有趣的讨论。对法律制度特征的研究旨在获得良好的法律制度来规范社会。每个国家法律制度的实施都受到该国历史发展和形成的强烈影响。我们有兴趣研究的两个国家是印度尼西亚和俄罗斯,作为法律法规方面的比较材料,特别是在为各自公民提供法律援助的过程中。作为一个加入欧洲大陆的国家,或者通常被称为大陆法系,印度尼西亚优先考虑来自正式法律来源的法律,如法律法规、习俗和判例。对两个不同国家的法律援助进行比较是非常有趣的,因为根据印度尼西亚国家和俄罗斯国家的形成历史,两者之间存在显著差异。由于这两个国家是殖民地,他们制定了遵循殖民地国家的法规。然而,俄罗斯政府与印度尼西亚政府的不同之处在于,它也参与了对其他国家的殖民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Music Aggregator Distribution Toward Music Performers in View of the Three Pillars of the Copyright System Measuring Ex Officio Judge Rights and Application of the Ultra Petitum Partium Principle in Deciding Cases in Religious Courts Reformulation of Commercial Court Authority Regulations Relation to the Arbitration Clause The Importance of Non-Conviction Based (NCB) Regulations For Asset Confiscation in Illegal Investment Civil Law in Indonesia and Russia: Easy and Affordable Access to Legal Aid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1