A critical evaluation of the work of the UN Human Rights Council, or taking stock of fifteen years without illusions

Q4 Social Sciences Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-19 DOI:10.1556/2052.2023.00432
István Lakatos
{"title":"A critical evaluation of the work of the UN Human Rights Council, or taking stock of fifteen years without illusions","authors":"István Lakatos","doi":"10.1556/2052.2023.00432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of this article, the author takes stock of the legacy of the UN Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and the changes that its replacement by the Human Rights Council (HRC) in 2006 have led to. A political body such as the CHR/HRC cannot do more than the member states allow it to do, and cannot be blamed for being driven by political motivations. Against this background it is not surprising that the new institutional framework did not solve the political problems associated with the CHR, since the new body was almost identical in size to its predecessor, involved the same actors, and operated under similar political conditions. The establishment of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism, however, introduced a new approach to the UN system by ensuring a cooperative review of the human rights situation of all UN member states, thus awarding an increasingly important role to the technical assistance pillar in implementing its recommendations. Notwithstanding the above, the UPR process has not rendered the adoption of country-specific resolutions unnecessary, but their use should be more strategic, ensuring better coordination within the UN system as a whole, and increasing the importance of the regional dimension in the work of the world organisation. It is not politically realistic to expect all HRC member states to have excellent, flawless human rights records, but the nomination of governments committed to and supportive of human rights should be encouraged. It is important to underline that over the past years, WEOG, EEG, and GRULAC countries, together with some pro-human-rights countries from Asia and Africa, have built successful coalitions within the HRC concerning a number of sensitive issues. The process of democratisation around the world, despite the decline in recent years, will further reinforce these positive trends, improving the composition of the HRC as more and more democratic countries hopefully seek to join the body.","PeriodicalId":37649,"journal":{"name":"Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2023.00432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of this article, the author takes stock of the legacy of the UN Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and the changes that its replacement by the Human Rights Council (HRC) in 2006 have led to. A political body such as the CHR/HRC cannot do more than the member states allow it to do, and cannot be blamed for being driven by political motivations. Against this background it is not surprising that the new institutional framework did not solve the political problems associated with the CHR, since the new body was almost identical in size to its predecessor, involved the same actors, and operated under similar political conditions. The establishment of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism, however, introduced a new approach to the UN system by ensuring a cooperative review of the human rights situation of all UN member states, thus awarding an increasingly important role to the technical assistance pillar in implementing its recommendations. Notwithstanding the above, the UPR process has not rendered the adoption of country-specific resolutions unnecessary, but their use should be more strategic, ensuring better coordination within the UN system as a whole, and increasing the importance of the regional dimension in the work of the world organisation. It is not politically realistic to expect all HRC member states to have excellent, flawless human rights records, but the nomination of governments committed to and supportive of human rights should be encouraged. It is important to underline that over the past years, WEOG, EEG, and GRULAC countries, together with some pro-human-rights countries from Asia and Africa, have built successful coalitions within the HRC concerning a number of sensitive issues. The process of democratisation around the world, despite the decline in recent years, will further reinforce these positive trends, improving the composition of the HRC as more and more democratic countries hopefully seek to join the body.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对联合国人权理事会的工作进行批判性评估,或者不抱幻想地回顾15年来的工作
在本文的背景下,作者回顾了联合国人权委员会(CHR)的遗产,以及2006年人权理事会(HRC)取代它所带来的变化。像人权理事会这样的政治机构不能做成员国允许它做的事情,也不能因为受到政治动机的驱使而受到指责。在这种背景下,新的机构框架没有解决与人权委员会有关的政治问题就不足为奇了,因为新的机构在规模上与其前身几乎相同,涉及同样的行动者,并在类似的政治条件下运作。然而,普遍定期审议机制(UPR)的建立,通过确保对所有联合国成员国的人权状况进行合作审查,为联合国系统引入了一种新的方法,从而使技术援助支柱在执行其建议方面发挥越来越重要的作用。尽管如此,普遍定期审议进程并没有使通过具体国家的决议变得不必要,但它们的使用应该更具战略性,确保在整个联合国系统内更好地协调,并增加区域层面在世界组织工作中的重要性。期望所有人权理事会成员国都拥有完美无瑕的人权记录在政治上是不现实的,但应该鼓励提名致力于和支持人权的政府。必须强调的是,在过去几年中,西非监测组、西非监测组和拉加体国家,以及来自亚洲和非洲的一些支持人权的国家,在人权委员会内部就一些敏感问题建立了成功的联盟。世界各地的民主化进程,尽管近年来有所下降,将进一步加强这些积极趋势,改善人权委员会的组成,因为越来越多的民主国家希望寻求加入该机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Acta Juridica presents the achievements of the legal sciences and legal scholars in Hungary and details of the Hungarian legislation and legal literature. The journal accepts articles from every field of the legal sciences. Recently, the editors have encouraged contributions from outside Hungary, with the aim of covering the legal sciences in the whole of Central and Eastern Europe. Publishes book reviews and advertisements.
期刊最新文献
Right to a modern trial: A new principle on the horizon of the digital age Internal dispute resolution systems: Do high promises come with higher expectations? Large language models and their possible uses in law Editorial: Challenges of children's rights “Humanity's new frontier”: Human rights implications of artificial intelligence and new technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1