Russian and Lithuanian Phraseological Units with Component береза / beržas: Linguocultural and Ethnolinguistic Aspects

Q4 Arts and Humanities Slavistica Vilnensis Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.15388/slavviln.2021.66(2).73
Jelena Konickaja
{"title":"Russian and Lithuanian Phraseological Units with Component береза / beržas: Linguocultural and Ethnolinguistic Aspects","authors":"Jelena Konickaja","doi":"10.15388/slavviln.2021.66(2).73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article deals with the problem of distinguishing between two types of analysis – linguocultural and ethnolinguistic, which can be cleared up by a contrastive study of Russian and Lithuanian phraseological units containing the name of a tree Russ. berjoza ‘birch’ (Lithuan. beržas). This linguocultural analysis emphasized considerable differences in the cultural and symbolic meanings of Russ. berjoza ‘birch’ and Lithuan. beržas. In the Russian linguistic picture of the world, a birch is generally seen as a light, positive tree associated with youth and beauty that is endowed with many positive qualities, while in the Lithuanian linguistic picture of the world, beržas is a useless tree. Еhe opposite features are also noted in both Russian berjoza and Lithuanian beržas. The ethnolinguistic aspect analyzed according to some of the more important parameters showed that the characteristics of the tree reflected in phraseology are often rooted in ancient concepts which are largely common to both peoples. The ethnolinguistic study that referred to the ancient ideas of the two ethnic groups reveals not only their differences, but also their strong similarity (the connection of the tree with the idea of the generations, death, with the chthonic world, and protective functions of a tree, etc.).","PeriodicalId":33056,"journal":{"name":"Slavistica Vilnensis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slavistica Vilnensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/slavviln.2021.66(2).73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present article deals with the problem of distinguishing between two types of analysis – linguocultural and ethnolinguistic, which can be cleared up by a contrastive study of Russian and Lithuanian phraseological units containing the name of a tree Russ. berjoza ‘birch’ (Lithuan. beržas). This linguocultural analysis emphasized considerable differences in the cultural and symbolic meanings of Russ. berjoza ‘birch’ and Lithuan. beržas. In the Russian linguistic picture of the world, a birch is generally seen as a light, positive tree associated with youth and beauty that is endowed with many positive qualities, while in the Lithuanian linguistic picture of the world, beržas is a useless tree. Еhe opposite features are also noted in both Russian berjoza and Lithuanian beržas. The ethnolinguistic aspect analyzed according to some of the more important parameters showed that the characteristics of the tree reflected in phraseology are often rooted in ancient concepts which are largely common to both peoples. The ethnolinguistic study that referred to the ancient ideas of the two ethnic groups reveals not only their differences, but also their strong similarity (the connection of the tree with the idea of the generations, death, with the chthonic world, and protective functions of a tree, etc.).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含береза/beržas成分的俄语和立陶宛语短语单位:语言文化和民族语言方面
本文讨论了区分两种分析类型——语言文化分析和民族语言分析的问题,这可以通过对俄语和立陶宛语包含俄语树名称的用语单位的对比研究来澄清。桦树(立陶宛语)ž翻番)。这种语言文化分析强调了俄语在文化和象征意义上的巨大差异。berjoza ' birch '和Lithuan。ž翻番。在俄语语言的世界图景中,桦树通常被视为一种光明、积极的树,与青春和美丽有关,被赋予了许多积极的品质,而在立陶宛语言的世界图景中,beržas是一棵无用的树。Еhe在俄语berjoza和立陶宛语beržas中也注意到相反的特征。根据一些更重要的参数分析的民族语言学方面表明,反映在短语中的树的特征往往植根于古代概念,这些概念在很大程度上是两个民族共同的。对两个民族古代观念的民族语言学研究不仅揭示了它们之间的差异,也揭示了它们强烈的相似性(树与世代观念、死亡观念、与民族世界观念的联系、树的保护功能等)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Slavistica Vilnensis
Slavistica Vilnensis Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Macarius: HTR modelis senoms slaviškoms spausdintoms knygoms iš Rumunijos Crow and Raven in Lithuanian and Slavic Phraseology and Ethnic Culture To the 95th anniversary of Doctor of Philology, Professor Adam Evgenievich Suprun „Aš myliu ir gerbiu visą Čekijos tautą“. Elzės Ožeškienės čekofilinės veiklos pėdsakai, pagrįsti laiškais Edvardui Jelinekui Investigating the Sources of the French Grammar (1724) by Ivan Gorlitsky
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1