Do Audiences Judge the Morality of Characters Relativistically? How Interdependence Affects Perceptions of Characters’ Temporal Moral Descent

IF 4.4 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Human Communication Research Pub Date : 2021-09-04 DOI:10.1093/hcr/hqab011
M. Grizzard, Nicholas L. Matthews, C. Francemone, K. Fitzgerald
{"title":"Do Audiences Judge the Morality of Characters Relativistically? How Interdependence Affects Perceptions of Characters’ Temporal Moral Descent","authors":"M. Grizzard, Nicholas L. Matthews, C. Francemone, K. Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1093/hcr/hqab011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In two pre-registered studies, we leveraged recent advances to disposition theory to examine whether character judgments are relative. We used a Pilot Study to develop a moral continuum of behaviors for a hypothetical television series. We referenced our established moral continuum to create behavioral sequences that represented two characters descending into immorality. We manipulated whether one or both characters were present in the narrative. The simultaneous presence of both characters polarized participants’ moral evaluations of character behavior, categorization of the characters as heroic/villainous, and character liking. Our findings substantiate the systematic effects that character interdependence has on disposition formation. An improved understanding of narrative context can specify when between- and within-character comparisons occur and what effects character interdependence has on disposition theory’s processes. We discuss how narrative schemas, character schemas, and character networks can serve as the elements for explicating the role of narrative context in disposition theory.","PeriodicalId":51377,"journal":{"name":"Human Communication Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Communication Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In two pre-registered studies, we leveraged recent advances to disposition theory to examine whether character judgments are relative. We used a Pilot Study to develop a moral continuum of behaviors for a hypothetical television series. We referenced our established moral continuum to create behavioral sequences that represented two characters descending into immorality. We manipulated whether one or both characters were present in the narrative. The simultaneous presence of both characters polarized participants’ moral evaluations of character behavior, categorization of the characters as heroic/villainous, and character liking. Our findings substantiate the systematic effects that character interdependence has on disposition formation. An improved understanding of narrative context can specify when between- and within-character comparisons occur and what effects character interdependence has on disposition theory’s processes. We discuss how narrative schemas, character schemas, and character networks can serve as the elements for explicating the role of narrative context in disposition theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
观众对角色道德的判断是相对的吗?相互依赖如何影响角色的时间道德血统
在两项预先注册的研究中,我们利用性格理论的最新进展来检验性格判断是否是相对的。我们使用了一项试点研究来为一个假设的电视连续剧开发一个行为的道德连续体。我们参考我们建立的道德连续体来创建行为序列,代表两个陷入不道德的角色。我们操纵叙事中是否有一个或两个角色出现。两个角色的同时出现使参与者对角色行为的道德评价两极分化,将角色归类为英雄/恶棍,以及角色喜好。我们的研究结果证实了性格相互依存对性格形成的系统影响。对叙事语境的更好理解可以指定角色之间和角色内部的比较何时发生,以及角色相互依存对性格理论的过程有什么影响。我们讨论了叙事图式、人物图式和人物网络如何作为解释叙事语境在性格理论中作用的要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Human Communication Research is one of the official journals of the prestigious International Communication Association and concentrates on presenting the best empirical work in the area of human communication. It is a top-ranked communication studies journal and one of the top ten journals in the field of human communication. Major topic areas for the journal include language and social interaction, nonverbal communication, interpersonal communication, organizational communication and new technologies, mass communication, health communication, intercultural communication, and developmental issues in communication.
期刊最新文献
Supportive communication as a collective phenomenon: a dynamic systems account of emotional support provision and outcomes in online health communities On the nature of influence: identifying and characterizing superdiffusers in seven countries Atoning vs. evading when caught transgressing: two multi-theory-based experiments investigating strategies for politicians responding to scandal A meta-analytical review of the relationship, antecedents, and consequences of information seeking and information scanning Getting socialized but trying not to get stuck: early career professionals’ liminality in dual socialization processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1