Assessment for behavior of axially loaded reinforced concrete columns strengthened by different patterns of steel-framed jacket

IF 1.5 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Open Engineering Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1515/eng-2022-0414
M. Shhatha, W. H. Mahdi, Ahmed A. Alalikhan
{"title":"Assessment for behavior of axially loaded reinforced concrete columns strengthened by different patterns of steel-framed jacket","authors":"M. Shhatha, W. H. Mahdi, Ahmed A. Alalikhan","doi":"10.1515/eng-2022-0414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Rehabilitation, upgrading, or strengthening of structural members, especially columns, has become the target of many researchers because columns are the most important members in a building and the failure of columns causes direct collapse in the building. This study aims to get an assessment of the best pattern of steel-framed jacket used for strengthening axially loaded concrete columns by numerically studying the behavior of the column for different cases of the same amount of steel jacket. The jacket consists of four angles and/or battens, lacings, or battens with lacings. The nonlinear analysis program designated as ARCC-SSJ (Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Columns Strengthened by Steel Jacket) is used to compare different patterns with the same and different cross-sections of battens and single lacing, as well as battens and lacing with battens taken into account. It is found that lacing with battens is the best pattern for the same amount of steel jacket with different cross-sectional areas. It is observed that the load-carrying capacity of the column increased by approximately 1.8 and 1.15% over that of battens alone in the case of a lacing angle of 60.83 2 ∘ 60.83{2}^{\\circ } and 74.40 7 ∘ 74.40{7}^{\\circ } with the vertical axis of the column, respectively.","PeriodicalId":19512,"journal":{"name":"Open Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2022-0414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Rehabilitation, upgrading, or strengthening of structural members, especially columns, has become the target of many researchers because columns are the most important members in a building and the failure of columns causes direct collapse in the building. This study aims to get an assessment of the best pattern of steel-framed jacket used for strengthening axially loaded concrete columns by numerically studying the behavior of the column for different cases of the same amount of steel jacket. The jacket consists of four angles and/or battens, lacings, or battens with lacings. The nonlinear analysis program designated as ARCC-SSJ (Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Columns Strengthened by Steel Jacket) is used to compare different patterns with the same and different cross-sections of battens and single lacing, as well as battens and lacing with battens taken into account. It is found that lacing with battens is the best pattern for the same amount of steel jacket with different cross-sectional areas. It is observed that the load-carrying capacity of the column increased by approximately 1.8 and 1.15% over that of battens alone in the case of a lacing angle of 60.83 2 ∘ 60.83{2}^{\circ } and 74.40 7 ∘ 74.40{7}^{\circ } with the vertical axis of the column, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同钢框架夹套加固钢筋混凝土轴心受压柱的性能评估
摘要结构构件,特别是柱的修复、升级或加固已成为许多研究人员的目标,因为柱是建筑物中最重要的构件,而柱的失效会导致建筑物的直接倒塌。本研究旨在通过数值研究相同钢夹套用量的不同情况下钢框架混凝土柱的性能,来评估用于加固轴心受压混凝土柱的钢框架夹套的最佳模式。夹克由四个角和/或板条、系带或带系带的板条组成。使用名为ARCC-SSJ(钢夹套加固钢筋混凝土柱的分析)的非线性分析程序,对相同和不同截面的板条和单根拉筋以及考虑板条和带板条的拉筋的不同模式进行比较。研究发现,对于相同数量、不同横截面积的钢夹套,板条系带是最好的方式。据观察,在与柱的垂直轴线成60.83 2∘60.83{2}^和74.40 7 \8728 74.40{7}^的拉筋角的情况下,柱的承载能力分别比单独的板条增加了约1.8%和1.15%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Engineering
Open Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Engineering publishes research results of wide interest in emerging interdisciplinary and traditional engineering fields, including: electrical and computer engineering, civil and environmental engineering, mechanical and aerospace engineering, material science and engineering. The journal is designed to facilitate the exchange of innovative and interdisciplinary ideas between researchers from different countries. Open Engineering is a peer-reviewed, English language journal. Researchers from non-English speaking regions are provided with free language correction by scientists who are native speakers. Additionally, each published article is widely promoted to researchers working in the same field.
期刊最新文献
Effect of chloride concentration on the corrosion resistance of pure Zn metal in a 0.0626 M H2SO4 solution Experimental and simulation study on a rooftop vertical-axis wind turbine Analysis of the operating parameters of electric, hybrid, and conventional vehicles on different types of roads Numerical and experimental analysis of the heat transfer process in a railway disc brake tested on a dynamometer stand Compressive forces influence on the vibrations of double beams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1