Leadership and cultural frames in Wole Soyinka’s “The strong breed”

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of English Studies Pub Date : 2018-12-18 DOI:10.18172/JES.3286
Ifeyinwa Obiegbu
{"title":"Leadership and cultural frames in Wole Soyinka’s “The strong breed”","authors":"Ifeyinwa Obiegbu","doi":"10.18172/JES.3286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on insights from sociology and critical discourse analysis, this study examines how religion enables persons and institutions to legitimise power and social control in a traditional African society. It shows that religion, besides being an instrument of social cohesion and harmony, can also serve the interest of the dominant group in the curtailment of the rights of the weak and the minority. This is built on the framework that the authorisation exercised by religious institutions and their agents is essentially derived from custom, tradition and conformity. The authorities of tradition and conformity ensure that agents sustain the cultural pattern irrespective of its consequences on human rights. This paper therefore examines how religious agents in Wole Soyinka’s “The Strong Breed” (1973) use the authorities of tradition and conformity to entrench tyranny. Analyses indicate that the social contradictions and conflicts that are immanent in the society of the play are functions of distinct ideological categories/cultural frames in dramatic conflicts which make social change inevitable.","PeriodicalId":35112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18172/JES.3286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on insights from sociology and critical discourse analysis, this study examines how religion enables persons and institutions to legitimise power and social control in a traditional African society. It shows that religion, besides being an instrument of social cohesion and harmony, can also serve the interest of the dominant group in the curtailment of the rights of the weak and the minority. This is built on the framework that the authorisation exercised by religious institutions and their agents is essentially derived from custom, tradition and conformity. The authorities of tradition and conformity ensure that agents sustain the cultural pattern irrespective of its consequences on human rights. This paper therefore examines how religious agents in Wole Soyinka’s “The Strong Breed” (1973) use the authorities of tradition and conformity to entrench tyranny. Analyses indicate that the social contradictions and conflicts that are immanent in the society of the play are functions of distinct ideological categories/cultural frames in dramatic conflicts which make social change inevitable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沃·索因卡的《强者》中的领导力和文化框架
基于社会学和批判性话语分析的见解,本研究探讨了宗教如何使个人和机构在传统非洲社会中使权力和社会控制合法化。这表明,宗教除了是社会凝聚力与和谐的工具之外,还可以在削弱弱者和少数人的权利方面为优势群体的利益服务。这是建立在这样一个框架之上的,即宗教机构及其代理人所行使的权力基本上来自习俗、传统和顺从。传统和顺从的权威确保代理人维持这种文化模式,而不管其对人权的影响。因此,本文考察了索因卡(woll soinka)的《坚强的品种》(The Strong Breed, 1973)中的宗教代理人是如何利用传统和顺从的权威来巩固暴政的。分析表明,戏剧社会内在的社会矛盾和冲突是不同的意识形态范畴/文化框架在戏剧冲突中的作用,这使得社会变革不可避免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of English Studies
Journal of English Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Becoming visible Mark McClelland’s "Upload" (2012) Old English-Origin Words in a Set Of Medieval Latin Accounts Emotional Intelligence Survey in the English as a Foreign Language Classroom Echoes from "Fight Club"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1