The Limits of Solidarity: The 1942 Protest Meeting at Caxton Hall against German Atrocities

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Labour History Review Pub Date : 2017-04-21 DOI:10.3828/LHR.2017.2
Michael Fleming
{"title":"The Limits of Solidarity: The 1942 Protest Meeting at Caxton Hall against German Atrocities","authors":"Michael Fleming","doi":"10.3828/LHR.2017.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the Second World War, news about the German persecution and mass murder of Europe’s Jews was received in Britain. The Bund Report of May 1942 stated that the occupying Germans had murdered 700,000 Polish Jews. Its receipt in Britain precipitated a (temporary) shift in how news of the Holocaust was reported. In late June and early July 1942, British newspapers published reports detailing German atrocities against Jews and, on 9 July 1942, the British Minister of Information hosted a conference that highlighted them. The left in Britain – the British Labour Party, exiled socialist parties, and other organizations – sought to respond to the terrible news from Poland. This paper explores that response. I focus on the important but much-overlooked protest meeting that took place on 2 September 1942 at Caxton Hall, Westminster. I argue that an analysis of the meeting – the preparation, the event, and its aftermath – sheds a great deal of light on how the left responded to news of the Holocaust, on the li...","PeriodicalId":43028,"journal":{"name":"Labour History Review","volume":"82 1","pages":"23-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3828/LHR.2017.2","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/LHR.2017.2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

During the Second World War, news about the German persecution and mass murder of Europe’s Jews was received in Britain. The Bund Report of May 1942 stated that the occupying Germans had murdered 700,000 Polish Jews. Its receipt in Britain precipitated a (temporary) shift in how news of the Holocaust was reported. In late June and early July 1942, British newspapers published reports detailing German atrocities against Jews and, on 9 July 1942, the British Minister of Information hosted a conference that highlighted them. The left in Britain – the British Labour Party, exiled socialist parties, and other organizations – sought to respond to the terrible news from Poland. This paper explores that response. I focus on the important but much-overlooked protest meeting that took place on 2 September 1942 at Caxton Hall, Westminster. I argue that an analysis of the meeting – the preparation, the event, and its aftermath – sheds a great deal of light on how the left responded to news of the Holocaust, on the li...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团结的极限:1942年在卡克斯顿大厅抗议德国暴行的集会
第二次世界大战期间,英国收到了德国迫害和大规模屠杀欧洲犹太人的消息。1942年5月的外滩报告称,占领的德国人杀害了70万波兰犹太人。它在英国的收到促成了大屠杀新闻报道方式的(暂时)转变。1942年6月底和7月初,英国报纸刊登了详细描述德国对犹太人暴行的报道,1942年7月9日,英国新闻部长主持了一次会议,强调了这些暴行。英国的左派——英国工党、流亡的社会主义政党和其他组织——试图对来自波兰的可怕消息做出回应。本文探讨了这种反应。我把重点放在1942年9月2日在威斯敏斯特卡克斯顿大厅举行的重要但被忽视的抗议会议上。我认为,对这次会议的分析——准备、活动及其后果——可以很好地揭示左派对大屠杀新闻的反应,以及对纳粹的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Boundary Review and the Organization and Identity of the Peterborough Divisional Labour Party Not an Industrial Matter: The British Trade Union Movement and Zionism, 1936–1967 ‘The Most Consistent of Them All’: William Sharman Crawford and the Politics of Suffrage In Defence of Steel: The Expulsion of Alfred Edwards MP and His Campaign against Steel Nationalization, 1948–1951 Patriotic Internationalists and Free Immigration: The British Labour Party’s Internationalism in Debates on Immigration Restriction, 1918–1931
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1