A Reflection on the Human Rights Attitude and International Law Approaches of Iran and Saudi Arabia

Moosa Akefi Ghaziani, Mohammad Akefi Ghaziani
{"title":"A Reflection on the Human Rights Attitude and International Law Approaches of Iran and Saudi Arabia","authors":"Moosa Akefi Ghaziani, Mohammad Akefi Ghaziani","doi":"10.1080/25765949.2022.2128133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Iran and Saudi Arabia are two of the most important countries in the Middle East. Not only do they enjoy the most abundant natural resources, but also have a geopolitical situation that makes their international attitude significant in terms of the East-West political-economic discourse. These features call for an in-depth comprehension of the international as well as human rights approaches of these nation-States. Therefore, this article reviews the foundations of their legal systems, and their contributions to the development of international law and human rights. It concludes that despite few human rights drawbacks in Saudi, its overall contributions to the development of international organisations, peace and security in the region, and human rights law are far greater than those of Iran. But what are the causes of this outcome? To answer this question, establishing a link between national law and international attitude is at stake. This article analyses the constitutional legal foundations that make such a study more interesting.","PeriodicalId":29909,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"310 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2022.2128133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Iran and Saudi Arabia are two of the most important countries in the Middle East. Not only do they enjoy the most abundant natural resources, but also have a geopolitical situation that makes their international attitude significant in terms of the East-West political-economic discourse. These features call for an in-depth comprehension of the international as well as human rights approaches of these nation-States. Therefore, this article reviews the foundations of their legal systems, and their contributions to the development of international law and human rights. It concludes that despite few human rights drawbacks in Saudi, its overall contributions to the development of international organisations, peace and security in the region, and human rights law are far greater than those of Iran. But what are the causes of this outcome? To answer this question, establishing a link between national law and international attitude is at stake. This article analyses the constitutional legal foundations that make such a study more interesting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗和沙特阿拉伯的人权态度与国际法路径思考
摘要伊朗和沙特阿拉伯是中东地区最重要的两个国家。他们不仅拥有最丰富的自然资源,而且地缘政治局势使他们的国际态度在东西方政治经济话语中具有重要意义。这些特点要求深入理解这些民族国家的国际和人权方针。因此,本文回顾了它们法律制度的基础,以及它们对国际法和人权发展的贡献。报告得出的结论是,尽管沙特在人权方面几乎没有缺点,但其对国际组织发展、该地区和平与安全以及人权法的总体贡献远大于伊朗。但造成这种结果的原因是什么?要回答这个问题,就必须在国内法和国际态度之间建立联系。本文分析了使这一研究更加有趣的宪法法律基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
The Cooperation between China and the Gulf Arab States in the Horn of Africa: From the Perspective of the Global South Hajj Factor in Saudi Arabia and Somaliland Relations China’s Views on Solving the Yemeni Issue Within the Framework of Global Security Initiative Producing Knowledge in the War Zones: Challenges and Risks of Academia in Rojava Israel’s Domestic Policy on Islam-Related Issues: A Preliminary Appraisal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1