Development of Artificial Intelligence Model to Forecast Photovoltaic Power Generation Including Airborne Particulate Matter

Jaeseong Yoon, Kyung-Min Kim, Johng-Hwa Ahn
{"title":"Development of Artificial Intelligence Model to Forecast Photovoltaic Power Generation Including Airborne Particulate Matter","authors":"Jaeseong Yoon, Kyung-Min Kim, Johng-Hwa Ahn","doi":"10.4491/ksee.2022.44.4.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : This study aims to suggest an optimal model for predicting photovoltaic (PV) power generation by comparing single and hybrid models that include particulate matter in the atmosphere as input parameters.Methods : From December 2016 to December 2019, 1 MW-class PV power generation data in Jindo-gun, Jeollanam-do and meteorological data and particulate matter data from Mokpo were used. Radiation, sunshine time, pressure, temperature, humidity, wind speed, wind direction, snow load, precipitation, PM10, and PM2.5 were used as input parameters. We used single models such as random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and gate recurrent unit (GRU) and hybrid model such as LSTM-ANN and GRU-ANN. Coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) were used to compare and evaluate the prediction performance of the models.Results and Discussion : The variable importance through RF was as follows: radiation (77.66%), day light hours (4.85%), pressure (4.16%), temperature (3.98%), humidity (2.25%), wind speed (2.21%), PM10 (2.72%), PM2.5 (1.65%), wind direction (1.44%), snow cover (0.05%), and precipitation (0.02%). GRU-ANN showed the highest R2 (0.838) among the models and lower epoch (8) than GRU using the early stop.Conclusion : The GRU-ANN model was the most suitable for forecasting PV power generation including particulate matter.","PeriodicalId":52756,"journal":{"name":"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2022.44.4.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose : This study aims to suggest an optimal model for predicting photovoltaic (PV) power generation by comparing single and hybrid models that include particulate matter in the atmosphere as input parameters.Methods : From December 2016 to December 2019, 1 MW-class PV power generation data in Jindo-gun, Jeollanam-do and meteorological data and particulate matter data from Mokpo were used. Radiation, sunshine time, pressure, temperature, humidity, wind speed, wind direction, snow load, precipitation, PM10, and PM2.5 were used as input parameters. We used single models such as random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and gate recurrent unit (GRU) and hybrid model such as LSTM-ANN and GRU-ANN. Coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) were used to compare and evaluate the prediction performance of the models.Results and Discussion : The variable importance through RF was as follows: radiation (77.66%), day light hours (4.85%), pressure (4.16%), temperature (3.98%), humidity (2.25%), wind speed (2.21%), PM10 (2.72%), PM2.5 (1.65%), wind direction (1.44%), snow cover (0.05%), and precipitation (0.02%). GRU-ANN showed the highest R2 (0.838) among the models and lower epoch (8) than GRU using the early stop.Conclusion : The GRU-ANN model was the most suitable for forecasting PV power generation including particulate matter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含大气颗粒物的光伏发电预测人工智能模型的发展
目的:本研究旨在通过比较包括大气中颗粒物作为输入参数的单一和混合模型,提出一种预测光伏发电的最佳模型。方法:使用2016年12月至2019年12月全罗南道金道郡1MW级光伏发电数据以及莫克波的气象数据和颗粒物数据。辐射、日照时间、气压、温度、湿度、风速、风向、雪量、降水量、PM10和PM2.5被用作输入参数。我们使用了单一模型,如随机森林(RF)、人工神经网络(ANN)、长短期记忆(LSTM)和门递归单元(GRU),以及混合模型,如LSTM-ANN和GRU-ANN。确定系数(R2)、均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)用于比较和评估模型的预测性能。结果与讨论:通过RF的变量重要性如下:辐射(77.66%)、日照时数(4.85%)、气压(4.16%)、温度(3.98%)、湿度(2.25%)、风速(2.21%)、PM10(2.72%)、PM2.5(1.65%)、风向(1.44%)、积雪(0.05%),GRU-ANN在模型中表现出最高的R2(0.838)和低于使用早期停止的GRU的历元(8)。结论:GRU-ANN模型是最适合预测包括颗粒物在内的光伏发电量的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Domestic Wastewater Treatment Processes by Modeling: Existing Estimation Methods vs Modeling A Study on Assessment of Carbon Absorption Footprint (CAF) and Forestation in Local Governments Greenhouse Gas Emissions of an Urban Water System in Korea: A case study of Paju city Evaluation of the Chemical Characteristics and Predictive Model of Water-Soluble Inorganic Ions for Fine Particulate Matter Generated in Pohang Characteristics of Soil Heavy Metal Contamination in the Intensive Livestock Farming Watersheds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1