The United States of America’s interlocked information industry: An examination into seven U.S. media sectors’ boards of directors

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS Journal of Media Business Studies Pub Date : 2020-02-29 DOI:10.1080/16522354.2020.1726671
J. Harker
{"title":"The United States of America’s interlocked information industry: An examination into seven U.S. media sectors’ boards of directors","authors":"J. Harker","doi":"10.1080/16522354.2020.1726671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This research explores the interfirm interlock networks that currently exist among publicly traded media conglomerates operating in the United States of America. Directorship information was gathered from annual reports and definitive proxy reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for 68 media conglomerates across seven media sectors for year ending 2018. This investigation applies social resource theory to assess the social networks formed by interfirm interlocks among media conglomerates and how such network structures address environmental uncertainty. Results indicate that not all alliances are mutually beneficial and those that are more resource-dependent endure negative cooptation effects. Moreover, today’s financial interlocks look very different than they did at the turn of the century. This research discusses how these changes in interfirm interlocks have resulted in directorship wars. Practical implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Business Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"219 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16522354.2020.1726671","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2020.1726671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research explores the interfirm interlock networks that currently exist among publicly traded media conglomerates operating in the United States of America. Directorship information was gathered from annual reports and definitive proxy reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for 68 media conglomerates across seven media sectors for year ending 2018. This investigation applies social resource theory to assess the social networks formed by interfirm interlocks among media conglomerates and how such network structures address environmental uncertainty. Results indicate that not all alliances are mutually beneficial and those that are more resource-dependent endure negative cooptation effects. Moreover, today’s financial interlocks look very different than they did at the turn of the century. This research discusses how these changes in interfirm interlocks have resulted in directorship wars. Practical implications are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美利坚合众国相互关联的信息产业:对美国七个媒体部门董事会的调查
摘要:本研究探讨了目前在美国上市的媒体集团之间存在的公司间连锁网络。董事信息收集自截至2018年的7个媒体行业的68家媒体集团向美国证券交易委员会提交的年度报告和最终代理报告。本研究运用社会资源理论来评估传媒集团企业间连锁所形成的社会网络,以及这种网络结构如何解决环境的不确定性。研究结果表明,并非所有的联盟都是互利的,资源依赖度较高的联盟会产生负面的合作效应。此外,今天的金融连锁体系与世纪之交的情况大不相同。本研究探讨了公司间连锁的这些变化是如何导致董事之争的。讨论了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Managing the narratives in narrative media brands The owner-market fit and responses to competing logics Obsolescence as a pattern: an analysis of how public service media managers perceive and cope with resistance to change in the platformisation era New media, new possibilities? How esports strategies guide an ambidextrous understanding of tradition and innovation in the German Bundesliga Exploring AI media. Definitions, conceptual model, research agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1