Treatment of patients with facial neuropathy by practicing neurologists: online survey

L. B. Zavaliy, M. Sinkin, M. Kalantarova, A. Rakhmanina, G. R. Ramazanov, N. Shamalov, S. Petrikov
{"title":"Treatment of patients with facial neuropathy by practicing neurologists: online survey","authors":"L. B. Zavaliy, M. Sinkin, M. Kalantarova, A. Rakhmanina, G. R. Ramazanov, N. Shamalov, S. Petrikov","doi":"10.30629/2658-7947-2023-28-3-28-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treatment of patients with facial neuropathy (FN) is a big scientific problem. There is no single protocol and patient management tactics are different. We have conducted an analysis of clinical practice in the treatment of patients with FN.Material and methods. An anonymous online survey of neurologists positioning themselves as supporters of evidencebased medicine was conducted (n = 139, work experience – 5 [3; 10] years). It included 10 questions. The analysis of methods of treatment was carried out. We compared the experience of specialists, who prescribed a certain drug, and who did not prescribe it. Descriptive statistics are given in the form of: absolute (n) and relative values (%), medians (Me), lower [q1] and upper [q3] quartiles.Results. In the studied sample with FN, all doctors recommend glucocorticosteroids, of which almost 2/3 allow use only in the first 3 days of the disease. Antiviral drugs are prescribed by 91.4% (n = 127) of specialists, the main indication is the presence of herpetic infection in visual examination (n = 104; 74.8%), less often a positive test for herpes infection (n = 23; 16.5%) or prosoplegia (n = 16; 11.5%). Anticholinesterase agents are prescribed by 38.1% (n = 53) of neurologists, their work experience is greater – 7 [5; 13] versus 5 [2; 9.75], p = 0.035. More than half (n = 81; 58.3%) of doctors do not recommend medications for additional drug therapy. Botulinum therapy is considered in the clinical practice of treatment of FN by 59% (n = 82) of doctors, regardless of work experience (p = 0.697), however, we observed a large variability of opinions according to the indications for use. When deciding on referral for surgical treatment, the most important doctors considered the problem of poor awareness of the types of operations (n = 83; 59.7%), as well as the lack of clear indications for surgical treatment (n = 62; 44.6%).Conclusion. The study revealed a diversity of opinions even among specialists who position themselves as supporters of evidence-based medicine. There is a great need to develop Russian clinical guidelines for facial nerve neuropathy.","PeriodicalId":36724,"journal":{"name":"Russian Neurological Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Neurological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30629/2658-7947-2023-28-3-28-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Treatment of patients with facial neuropathy (FN) is a big scientific problem. There is no single protocol and patient management tactics are different. We have conducted an analysis of clinical practice in the treatment of patients with FN.Material and methods. An anonymous online survey of neurologists positioning themselves as supporters of evidencebased medicine was conducted (n = 139, work experience – 5 [3; 10] years). It included 10 questions. The analysis of methods of treatment was carried out. We compared the experience of specialists, who prescribed a certain drug, and who did not prescribe it. Descriptive statistics are given in the form of: absolute (n) and relative values (%), medians (Me), lower [q1] and upper [q3] quartiles.Results. In the studied sample with FN, all doctors recommend glucocorticosteroids, of which almost 2/3 allow use only in the first 3 days of the disease. Antiviral drugs are prescribed by 91.4% (n = 127) of specialists, the main indication is the presence of herpetic infection in visual examination (n = 104; 74.8%), less often a positive test for herpes infection (n = 23; 16.5%) or prosoplegia (n = 16; 11.5%). Anticholinesterase agents are prescribed by 38.1% (n = 53) of neurologists, their work experience is greater – 7 [5; 13] versus 5 [2; 9.75], p = 0.035. More than half (n = 81; 58.3%) of doctors do not recommend medications for additional drug therapy. Botulinum therapy is considered in the clinical practice of treatment of FN by 59% (n = 82) of doctors, regardless of work experience (p = 0.697), however, we observed a large variability of opinions according to the indications for use. When deciding on referral for surgical treatment, the most important doctors considered the problem of poor awareness of the types of operations (n = 83; 59.7%), as well as the lack of clear indications for surgical treatment (n = 62; 44.6%).Conclusion. The study revealed a diversity of opinions even among specialists who position themselves as supporters of evidence-based medicine. There is a great need to develop Russian clinical guidelines for facial nerve neuropathy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
执业神经学家治疗面神经病变患者的在线调查
面神经病变的治疗是一个重大的科学问题。没有单一的治疗方案,患者管理策略也各不相同。我们对FN患者治疗的临床实践进行了分析。材料和方法。对将自己定位为循证医学支持者的神经科医生进行了一项匿名在线调查(n = 139,工作经验- 5;10年)。它包括10个问题。对处理方法进行了分析。我们比较了开某种药和不开这种药的专家的经验。描述性统计以绝对(n)和相对值(%)、中位数(Me)、下[q1]和上[q3]四分位数的形式给出。在FN研究样本中,所有医生都推荐糖皮质激素,其中近2/3只允许在疾病的前3天使用。91.4% (n = 127)的专科医生开具了抗病毒药物,主要指征是视力检查中存在疱疹感染(n = 104);74.8%),疱疹感染检测阳性较少(n = 23;16.5%)或残瘫(n = 16;11.5%)。38.1% (n = 53)的神经科医生使用抗胆碱酯酶药物,其工作经验较大[7];13] vs . 5 [2];9.75], p = 0.035。超过一半(n = 81;58.3%)的医生不建议患者进行额外的药物治疗。在临床实践中,59% (n = 82)的医生认为肉毒杆菌治疗FN,无论工作经验如何(p = 0.697),然而,我们观察到根据使用适应症的意见存在很大差异。在决定转诊手术治疗时,最重要的医生考虑的问题是对手术类型的认识不佳(n = 83;59.7%),以及缺乏明确的手术治疗指征(n = 62;44.6%) .Conclusion。这项研究表明,即使在那些自称是循证医学支持者的专家中,意见也存在差异。俄罗斯非常需要制定面神经病变的临床指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Neurological Journal
Russian Neurological Journal Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
100 years since the birth of Professor M.Ya. Berdichevsky Variability of alternating hemiplegia in children Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in patients with diffuse gliomas of the brain Specific features of actual infectious diseases in postpandemic period Immunological status of patients in the acute period of ischemic stroke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1