A study of phatic emoji use in WhatsApp communication

IF 1.1 Q3 COMMUNICATION Internet Pragmatics Pub Date : 2019-12-03 DOI:10.1075/IP.00029.AUL
Bethany Aull
{"title":"A study of phatic emoji use in WhatsApp communication","authors":"Bethany Aull","doi":"10.1075/IP.00029.AUL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Mobile messaging is considered as a prominent site for phatic\n communication, where interpersonal connection is often foregrounded over information transaction. Though frequently overlooked, a large amount of this interpersonal work is done\n nonverbally through regular and meaningful emoji use. This exploratory study\n deals with emoji use within Laver’s (1975) phatic token\n framework, showing that different relationship structures (e.g., status-differential vs. solidary) correspond to distinct phatic token norms. The article analyzes phatic emoji use in a small-scale corpus of\n WhatsApp interactions between (a) a teacher and her\n L2-English students and (b) a teacher and her friends/family. Qualitative\n and quantitative analyses reveal patterns which widely corroborate Laver’s\n account of socially marked and unmarked token options: the teacher, the\n students, and the friends/family members tend towards addressee-specific use of neutral,\n other-oriented, and self-oriented phatic emojis.","PeriodicalId":36241,"journal":{"name":"Internet Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/IP.00029.AUL","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Mobile messaging is considered as a prominent site for phatic communication, where interpersonal connection is often foregrounded over information transaction. Though frequently overlooked, a large amount of this interpersonal work is done nonverbally through regular and meaningful emoji use. This exploratory study deals with emoji use within Laver’s (1975) phatic token framework, showing that different relationship structures (e.g., status-differential vs. solidary) correspond to distinct phatic token norms. The article analyzes phatic emoji use in a small-scale corpus of WhatsApp interactions between (a) a teacher and her L2-English students and (b) a teacher and her friends/family. Qualitative and quantitative analyses reveal patterns which widely corroborate Laver’s account of socially marked and unmarked token options: the teacher, the students, and the friends/family members tend towards addressee-specific use of neutral, other-oriented, and self-oriented phatic emojis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在WhatsApp通信中使用“发”表情符号的研究
手机短信被认为是一个重要的网络通信平台,在这里,人与人之间的联系往往比信息交易更重要。尽管经常被忽视,但大量的人际关系工作是通过定期和有意义的表情符号的使用来完成的。这项探索性研究在Laver(1975)的表情符号框架中处理表情符号的使用,表明不同的关系结构(例如,地位差异与团结)对应于不同的表情符号规范。本文分析了WhatsApp互动的小规模语料库中表情符号的使用(a)一位老师和她的l2英语学生以及(b)一位老师和她的朋友/家人。定性和定量分析揭示的模式广泛证实了Laver对社会标记和未标记符号选项的描述:教师、学生和朋友/家人倾向于使用中性、他人导向和自我导向的表情符号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Pragmatics
Internet Pragmatics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
The invitation game “Resident superhero” Being sensible is now a radical concept I LOVE that quote haha “I’m only half Korean but I can relate to a lot of what you said” Flirting and winking in Tinder chats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1