Increasing Equitable Access to Individuals with Disabilities: Participation in Electronic Public Administration Research

IF 1.1 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.20899/jpna.7.3.434-442
Michelle Allgood
{"title":"Increasing Equitable Access to Individuals with Disabilities: Participation in Electronic Public Administration Research","authors":"Michelle Allgood","doi":"10.20899/jpna.7.3.434-442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individuals with disabilities (both physical and cognitive) constitute 15% of the global population and 25% of U.S. citizens. However, public administration has not given explicit thought to how current research methods and other data collection processes or tools might exclude individuals with disabilities. This lack of attention to research methods and instruments might impose barriers and limit access to participation for individuals with disabilities who would otherwise meet the requirements for participation within the research design. This omission undermines social equity, a critical pillar of public administration, by systematically excluding individuals with disabilities from the research process. Equitable research ensures that scholars are not excluding participants from the research while obtaining insights from the ‘relevant population.’ Current exclusionary practices raise several questions that are addressed in this essay including: (1) What are the implications of equitable access in electronic research? (2) What are the barriers of access for individuals with disabilities who want to participate in research, like surveys conducted through an electronic delivery system? and (3) What would an equitable data collection and research design look like?","PeriodicalId":43150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.7.3.434-442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with disabilities (both physical and cognitive) constitute 15% of the global population and 25% of U.S. citizens. However, public administration has not given explicit thought to how current research methods and other data collection processes or tools might exclude individuals with disabilities. This lack of attention to research methods and instruments might impose barriers and limit access to participation for individuals with disabilities who would otherwise meet the requirements for participation within the research design. This omission undermines social equity, a critical pillar of public administration, by systematically excluding individuals with disabilities from the research process. Equitable research ensures that scholars are not excluding participants from the research while obtaining insights from the ‘relevant population.’ Current exclusionary practices raise several questions that are addressed in this essay including: (1) What are the implications of equitable access in electronic research? (2) What are the barriers of access for individuals with disabilities who want to participate in research, like surveys conducted through an electronic delivery system? and (3) What would an equitable data collection and research design look like?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加对残障人士的公平接触:参与电子公共管理研究
残疾人(包括身体和认知残疾)占全球人口的15%,占美国公民的25%。然而,公共行政部门没有明确考虑目前的研究方法和其他数据收集过程或工具如何将残疾人排除在外。这种对研究方法和工具缺乏关注的情况可能会造成障碍,并限制残疾人参与研究的机会,否则他们将满足参与研究设计的要求。这一遗漏系统地将残疾人排除在研究过程之外,破坏了作为公共行政关键支柱的社会公平。公平的研究确保了学者在从“相关人群”中获得见解的同时,不会将参与者排除在研究之外当前的排他性做法提出了本文要解决的几个问题,包括:(1)公平获取在电子研究中的含义是什么?(2) 想要参与研究(如通过电子传递系统进行的调查)的残疾人的准入障碍是什么?以及(3)公平的数据收集和研究设计会是什么样子?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Empowerment or Exploitation? Ethical Engagement of Survivor Leaders in Anti-Trafficking Organizations Defining and Measuring Economic Development: A Literature Review and Outlook Unpacking the Volunteer Experience: The Influence of Volunteer Management on Retention and Promotion of the Organization Front Matter #BlackLivesMatter (BLM) Was Never About Officer Race
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1