Reading methods and referential context effects in L2 ambiguity resolution

IF 0.4 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistic Research Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.17250/khisli.36..201909.001
Yoo-ki Kim, Jeong-Ah Shin
{"title":"Reading methods and referential context effects in L2 ambiguity resolution","authors":"Yoo-ki Kim, Jeong-Ah Shin","doi":"10.17250/khisli.36..201909.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kim, YooLae and Jeong-Ah Shin. 2019. Reading methods and referential context effects in L2 ambiguity resolution. Linguistic Research 36(Special Edition), 1-23. Second language (L2) learners’ syntactic processing is known to be shallow and fragile, but a number of studies have indicated that L2 learners have the potential to overcome their weak syntactic representations and have more concrete syntactic processing under some specific circumstances (Lim and Ahn 2015; Lim and Christianson 2013a, 2013b, 2015; Williams 2006). This study examined L2 learners’ ambiguous sentence processing through various factors, and investigated whether the auditory perceptual simulation (APS) method induces faster reading times and better comprehension results for an ambiguous sentence such as The patient presented by the doctor felt embarrassed forgetting all the attention compared to silent reading, and whether different contextual information affects the learners in processing such ambiguous sentences more effectively. In a self-paced reading experiment, participants read reduced clause or unreduced relative clause sentences preceded by 1-NP-referent contexts or 2-NP-referents contexts through silent reading or APS reading. If the APS reading group were affected by prosodic information, they would have faster reading times and higher accuracy rates than the silent reading group. In addition, if the participants were able to use the referential information from the context, the 2-NP-referents contexts would also show better processing. The results revealed that both the silent reading group and the APS reading group had good comprehension outcomes, indicating that reading methods had no effects in inducing the readers to process ambiguous sentences. However, the reading times for the target region showed the effects of the reading method, the proficiency, the context, and the sentence type, indicating that APS reading enhanced reading of past participles of reduced relative clause more naturally. Especially for the intermediate learners, there was a significant main effect for the APS reading methods, which helped them to have better reading skills for syntactic processing. (Dongguk University)","PeriodicalId":43095,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.36..201909.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Kim, YooLae and Jeong-Ah Shin. 2019. Reading methods and referential context effects in L2 ambiguity resolution. Linguistic Research 36(Special Edition), 1-23. Second language (L2) learners’ syntactic processing is known to be shallow and fragile, but a number of studies have indicated that L2 learners have the potential to overcome their weak syntactic representations and have more concrete syntactic processing under some specific circumstances (Lim and Ahn 2015; Lim and Christianson 2013a, 2013b, 2015; Williams 2006). This study examined L2 learners’ ambiguous sentence processing through various factors, and investigated whether the auditory perceptual simulation (APS) method induces faster reading times and better comprehension results for an ambiguous sentence such as The patient presented by the doctor felt embarrassed forgetting all the attention compared to silent reading, and whether different contextual information affects the learners in processing such ambiguous sentences more effectively. In a self-paced reading experiment, participants read reduced clause or unreduced relative clause sentences preceded by 1-NP-referent contexts or 2-NP-referents contexts through silent reading or APS reading. If the APS reading group were affected by prosodic information, they would have faster reading times and higher accuracy rates than the silent reading group. In addition, if the participants were able to use the referential information from the context, the 2-NP-referents contexts would also show better processing. The results revealed that both the silent reading group and the APS reading group had good comprehension outcomes, indicating that reading methods had no effects in inducing the readers to process ambiguous sentences. However, the reading times for the target region showed the effects of the reading method, the proficiency, the context, and the sentence type, indicating that APS reading enhanced reading of past participles of reduced relative clause more naturally. Especially for the intermediate learners, there was a significant main effect for the APS reading methods, which helped them to have better reading skills for syntactic processing. (Dongguk University)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二语歧义消解中的阅读方法与指称语境效应
金、尹莱和郑阿信。2019.二语歧义消解中的阅读方法和指称语境效应。语言学研究36(特别版),1-23。众所周知,第二语言学习者的句法处理是肤浅和脆弱的,但许多研究表明,第二语学习者有潜力克服其薄弱的句法表征,并在某些特定情况下进行更具体的句法处理(Lim和Ahn 2015;Lim和Christianson 2013a,2013b,2015;Williams 2006)。本研究通过各种因素考察了二语学习者对歧义句的处理,并调查了听觉感知模拟(APS)方法是否能更快地阅读歧义句,并对歧义句产生更好的理解效果,以及不同的语境信息是否会影响学习者更有效地处理此类歧义句。在一项自定节奏的阅读实验中,参与者通过无声阅读或APS阅读,阅读前有1-NP参考上下文或2-NP参考上下文的缩减从句或未缩减关系从句。如果APS阅读组受到韵律信息的影响,他们的阅读时间和准确率将比无声阅读组更快。此外,如果参与者能够使用上下文中的参考信息,2-NP参考上下文也会显示出更好的处理能力。结果表明,无声阅读组和APS阅读组都有良好的理解效果,表明阅读方法在诱导读者处理歧义句子方面没有效果。然而,目标区域的阅读次数显示了阅读方法、熟练程度、上下文和句子类型的影响,表明APS阅读更自然地增强了减少关系从句的过去分词的阅读。特别是对于中级学习者来说,APS阅读方法有显著的主效应,有助于他们在句法处理方面拥有更好的阅读技能。(东国大学)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Research
Linguistic Research LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Linguistic Research is an international journal which offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical research dealing with natural language data. The journal publishes articles of high quality which make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal embraces both synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and carries articles that address language-specific as well as cross-linguistic and typological research questions. The journal features syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, phonetics, and pragmatics and is currently published quarterly (March, June, September, and December), including the special September issue with a particular focus on applied linguistics covering (second) language acquisition, ESL/EFL, conversation/discourse analysis, etc. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent expert referees.
期刊最新文献
Overt subject NPs as a contrast marker in Korean discourse Keyword analyses of English charter parties How do speakers of different languages differ in the encoding of complex motion events Revisiting the persuade-constructions in Korean with empirical evidence Loanword adaptation of English coronal fricatives into Mandarin Chinese
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1