A comparative study of teachers’ beliefs about gifted students’ leadership talent

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL High Ability Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-19 DOI:10.1080/13598139.2022.2081964
Seon-young Lee, M. Matthews, J. Y. Jung, Jinwoo Kim, Hyesu Park
{"title":"A comparative study of teachers’ beliefs about gifted students’ leadership talent","authors":"Seon-young Lee, M. Matthews, J. Y. Jung, Jinwoo Kim, Hyesu Park","doi":"10.1080/13598139.2022.2081964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite the likely relevance of socio-cultural context, very few studies have examined the influence of cultural values on teachers’ perceptions of gifted students’ leadership development. This study chose three nations representing collectivistic to individualistic contexts and compared how 478 teachers from these countries (South Korea = 176, 36.8%, Australia = 169, 35.4%, U.S. = 133, 27.8%) differed in their beliefs about the prevalence and development of gifted students’ leadership talent. Differences were found between the individualistic (Australia and the U.S.) and collectivistic (South Korea) settings in their beliefs regarding which students have leadership potential; their judgments about effective leadership styles and leader qualities; their perceptions of gifted students’ qualifications as future leaders; and their preferred criteria for recommending students for a leadership education program. Although unable to identify causal relationships, this study nevertheless cautiously suggests that leadership and leaders are intertwined with culturally mediated values and practices. Future studies should continue examining these differences in cross-cultural comparative contexts.","PeriodicalId":46343,"journal":{"name":"High Ability Studies","volume":"34 1","pages":"131 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Ability Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2022.2081964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite the likely relevance of socio-cultural context, very few studies have examined the influence of cultural values on teachers’ perceptions of gifted students’ leadership development. This study chose three nations representing collectivistic to individualistic contexts and compared how 478 teachers from these countries (South Korea = 176, 36.8%, Australia = 169, 35.4%, U.S. = 133, 27.8%) differed in their beliefs about the prevalence and development of gifted students’ leadership talent. Differences were found between the individualistic (Australia and the U.S.) and collectivistic (South Korea) settings in their beliefs regarding which students have leadership potential; their judgments about effective leadership styles and leader qualities; their perceptions of gifted students’ qualifications as future leaders; and their preferred criteria for recommending students for a leadership education program. Although unable to identify causal relationships, this study nevertheless cautiously suggests that leadership and leaders are intertwined with culturally mediated values and practices. Future studies should continue examining these differences in cross-cultural comparative contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对资优学生领导才能信念的比较研究
摘要尽管社会文化背景可能具有相关性,但很少有研究考察文化价值观对教师对天才学生领导力发展的影响。本研究选择了三个代表集体主义和个人主义背景的国家,并比较了来自这些国家的478名教师(韩国=176,36.8%,澳大利亚=169,35.4%,美国=133,27.8%)对天才学生领导才能的普遍性和发展的信念差异。个人主义(澳大利亚和美国)和集体主义(韩国)在学生具有领导潜力的信念方面存在差异;他们对有效领导风格和领导者素质的判断;他们对天才学生作为未来领导者的资格的看法;以及他们推荐学生参加领导力教育项目的首选标准。尽管无法确定因果关系,但这项研究谨慎地表明,领导力和领导者与文化中介的价值观和实践交织在一起。未来的研究应该在跨文化比较背景下继续研究这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: High Ability Studies provides a forum for scholars in a variety of disciplines associated with the development of human abilities to their highest level. It is a medium for the promotion of high ability, whether through the communication of scientific research, theory, or the exchange of practical experience and ideas. The contents of this journal are unique in reflecting concerns and recent developments in this area from childhood and across the whole life span in a variety of contexts. Far from being restricted to the traditional focus on high-level cognitive development, it also presents investigations into all other areas of human endeavour, including sport, technology, the arts, business, management and social relations.
期刊最新文献
Self-regulated learning while solving mathematical problems among mathematically gifted and talented students’ The relations of social competence and mental well-being by perception of giftedness in gifted students Is it time to retire ‘talent’ from discussions of athlete development? Exploring mental representations of prospective teachers about gifted education using associative group analysis College students with high abilities in liberal arts disciplines: Examining the effect of spirituality in bolstering self-regulated learning, affect balance, peer relationships, and well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1