Correctional oversight bodies’ resources and protections across the European Union: Are their hands tied?

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Criminology & Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2021-01-12 DOI:10.1177/1748895820986966
E. Aizpurua, M. Rogan
{"title":"Correctional oversight bodies’ resources and protections across the European Union: Are their hands tied?","authors":"E. Aizpurua, M. Rogan","doi":"10.1177/1748895820986966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oversight bodies play a critical role in upholding human rights standards in prison. Several international instruments require states to establish independent forms of prison oversight and to give them the powers they need to conduct their work. Resources are central to the effectiveness and independence of oversight bodies. Of equal importance is the ability of prison oversight bodies to offer protections against reprisals for those who choose to speak to them and for their own staff. In this article, we provide results from the first survey of prison oversight bodies in the European Union and the United Kingdom, focusing on the resources and protections which prison oversight bodies in these states have to enable them to conduct their work. Our results suggest the need to strengthen the financial independence of prison oversight bodies, with slightly less than half of the bodies having their own budget to monitor prisons. Bodies which had their own budgets had a greater number of staff members and a greater variety of professional backgrounds among their members, likely influencing their ability to fulfil their mandate. Our results also point to the need to develop further protection mechanisms against reprisals for those who speak with inspectors as well as for staff from prison oversight bodies.","PeriodicalId":47217,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1748895820986966","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895820986966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Oversight bodies play a critical role in upholding human rights standards in prison. Several international instruments require states to establish independent forms of prison oversight and to give them the powers they need to conduct their work. Resources are central to the effectiveness and independence of oversight bodies. Of equal importance is the ability of prison oversight bodies to offer protections against reprisals for those who choose to speak to them and for their own staff. In this article, we provide results from the first survey of prison oversight bodies in the European Union and the United Kingdom, focusing on the resources and protections which prison oversight bodies in these states have to enable them to conduct their work. Our results suggest the need to strengthen the financial independence of prison oversight bodies, with slightly less than half of the bodies having their own budget to monitor prisons. Bodies which had their own budgets had a greater number of staff members and a greater variety of professional backgrounds among their members, likely influencing their ability to fulfil their mandate. Our results also point to the need to develop further protection mechanisms against reprisals for those who speak with inspectors as well as for staff from prison oversight bodies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟各地惩教监督机构的资源和保护:他们被束缚了吗?
监督机构在维护监狱人权标准方面发挥着关键作用。若干国际文书要求各国建立独立形式的监狱监督,并赋予其开展工作所需的权力。资源对监督机构的效力和独立性至关重要。同样重要的是,监狱监督机构是否有能力保护那些选择向它们说话的人及其工作人员不受报复。在本文中,我们提供了对欧盟和英国监狱监督机构的首次调查结果,重点关注这些国家的监狱监督机构为开展工作所拥有的资源和保护。我们的研究结果表明,需要加强监狱监督机构的财政独立性,只有略少于一半的机构有自己的预算来监督监狱。拥有自己预算的机构的工作人员人数较多,其成员的专业背景也更为多样化,这可能影响到它们履行任务的能力。我们的研究结果还指出,有必要进一步制定保护机制,防止与检查员交谈的人以及监狱监督机构的工作人员遭到报复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Criminology & Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
期刊最新文献
Situational context and public perceptions of officer appearance: A vignette-based study of police uniforms and accouterments How cryptomarket communities navigate marketplace structures, risk perceptions and ideologies amid evolving cryptocurrency practices Evaluation of an enhanced behavioural monitoring system in UK open prisons ‘I’m a red-blooded male’: Understanding men’s experiences of domestic abuse through a feminist lens Stable housing, ‘home’ and desistance: Views from Aotearoa New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1