Exploring the edges of collegiality: a cross-case analysis toward humanizing teachers’ connected learning

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pedagogies Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/1554480X.2021.1919117
Anna Smith, Cherise McBride, Christopher R. Rogers
{"title":"Exploring the edges of collegiality: a cross-case analysis toward humanizing teachers’ connected learning","authors":"Anna Smith, Cherise McBride, Christopher R. Rogers","doi":"10.1080/1554480X.2021.1919117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article provides a comparative case study of two connected learning experiences in teacher education that vary in scope, participants, time, and design to consider the questions: 1) What characterizes humanizing engagement across varied experiences of connected learning in teacher education? and 2) What repertoires of practice become shared through discourses of collegiality in educators’ connected learning experiences? Back-tracing from educators’ written reflections to their digitally networked activity in Twitter chats, processual case analysis involved rounds of inductive coding and exploratory data visualization. We identified repertoires of practice across three continua of preservice and inservice educators’ practices–sharing, care, and experimentation–which together characterize a range of more and less humanizing discourses of collegiality. Participants in both cases reflected on experiences across the spectrum of each continua, highlighting the limits of these connected learning designs in fostering humanizing learning experience in teacher education. We provide implications for teacher educators regarding fostering more critical and reflexive humanizing connected learning in teacher education as well as for the design of such experiences.","PeriodicalId":45770,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1554480X.2021.1919117","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2021.1919117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article provides a comparative case study of two connected learning experiences in teacher education that vary in scope, participants, time, and design to consider the questions: 1) What characterizes humanizing engagement across varied experiences of connected learning in teacher education? and 2) What repertoires of practice become shared through discourses of collegiality in educators’ connected learning experiences? Back-tracing from educators’ written reflections to their digitally networked activity in Twitter chats, processual case analysis involved rounds of inductive coding and exploratory data visualization. We identified repertoires of practice across three continua of preservice and inservice educators’ practices–sharing, care, and experimentation–which together characterize a range of more and less humanizing discourses of collegiality. Participants in both cases reflected on experiences across the spectrum of each continua, highlighting the limits of these connected learning designs in fostering humanizing learning experience in teacher education. We provide implications for teacher educators regarding fostering more critical and reflexive humanizing connected learning in teacher education as well as for the design of such experiences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索合作的边缘:教师关联学习人性化的跨案例分析
本文对教师教育中两种不同范围、参与者、时间和设计的关联学习体验进行了比较案例研究,以思考以下问题:1)在教师教育中不同的关联学习体验中,人性化参与的特征是什么?2)在教育者的相互联系的学习经验中,通过合作的话语分享了哪些实践技能?从教育者的书面反思回溯到他们在Twitter聊天中的数字网络活动,过程性案例分析包括几轮归纳编码和探索性数据可视化。我们在三个连续的职前和在职教育工作者的实践中确定了实践的特点——分享、关怀和实验——它们共同表征了一系列或多或少人性化的合作话语。这两种情况下的参与者都反映了每个连续体的经验,强调了这些相互联系的学习设计在促进教师教育中人性化学习体验方面的局限性。我们为教师教育工作者提供了在教师教育中培养更具批判性和反思性的人性化连接学习以及设计此类体验的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogies
Pedagogies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Perceptions and beliefs of Indian secondary school teachers regarding story telling Effects of peer instruction on academic achievement: a meta-analysis The student motivation handbook: 50 ways to boost an intrinsic desire to learn Mapping the landscape of an ICE community of learnership Influence of different approaches to design-based learning on eighth grade students’ science content learning and STEM identity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1