Investment project efficiency and risk evaluation: an integrated approach

M. Shtefan, Julia Elizarova
{"title":"Investment project efficiency and risk evaluation: an integrated approach","authors":"M. Shtefan, Julia Elizarova","doi":"10.17323/1998-0663.2018.4.54.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While evaluating and selecting investment projects, modern companies are confronted with the problem of setting priorities between profitability and riskiness of these projects. Choice of a project on the basis of its profitability significantly increases risks of financial and economic activities and decreases the certainty of achieving the planned financial result. On the other hand, attempts to decrease investment projects risks may not allow one to achieve the desired profitability level. Therefore, it is vital to develop integrated multi-criteria indicators for this purpose. This article is the result of the authors’ development of an integral indicator for evaluating investment project efficiency and risks. The developed integral indicator has a matrix form. To compile the integral indicator, three groups of criteria are used: quantitative efficiency criteria, qualitative efficiency criteria and risk evaluation criteria. We propose to divide the qualitative and quantitative criteria into: 1) those defining the commercial (economic) efficiency of projects, 2) those defining their budgetary efficiency; 3) those defining their social efficiency. According to the authors, the list of criteria that define associated risks should include macroeconomic indicators and industry affiliation indicators that provide a comprehensive evaluation of the external economic situation on the corresponding market. While evaluating efficiency and riskiness of the given projects, the integral indicator developed by the authors is converted from matrix form into a quantitative indicator that is easy to interpret. The authors propose to use principal component analysis and heuristic methods (including ranking method and hierarchy analysis method) for this purpose. The results of this research can be used by companies to select investment projects.","PeriodicalId":41920,"journal":{"name":"Biznes Informatika-Business Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biznes Informatika-Business Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1998-0663.2018.4.54.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

While evaluating and selecting investment projects, modern companies are confronted with the problem of setting priorities between profitability and riskiness of these projects. Choice of a project on the basis of its profitability significantly increases risks of financial and economic activities and decreases the certainty of achieving the planned financial result. On the other hand, attempts to decrease investment projects risks may not allow one to achieve the desired profitability level. Therefore, it is vital to develop integrated multi-criteria indicators for this purpose. This article is the result of the authors’ development of an integral indicator for evaluating investment project efficiency and risks. The developed integral indicator has a matrix form. To compile the integral indicator, three groups of criteria are used: quantitative efficiency criteria, qualitative efficiency criteria and risk evaluation criteria. We propose to divide the qualitative and quantitative criteria into: 1) those defining the commercial (economic) efficiency of projects, 2) those defining their budgetary efficiency; 3) those defining their social efficiency. According to the authors, the list of criteria that define associated risks should include macroeconomic indicators and industry affiliation indicators that provide a comprehensive evaluation of the external economic situation on the corresponding market. While evaluating efficiency and riskiness of the given projects, the integral indicator developed by the authors is converted from matrix form into a quantitative indicator that is easy to interpret. The authors propose to use principal component analysis and heuristic methods (including ranking method and hierarchy analysis method) for this purpose. The results of this research can be used by companies to select investment projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资项目效率与风险评价:综合评价方法
在评估和选择投资项目时,现代公司面临着在这些项目的盈利能力和风险之间设定优先级的问题。基于盈利能力选择项目会显著增加财务和经济活动的风险,降低实现计划财务结果的确定性。另一方面,试图降低投资项目风险可能无法达到预期的盈利水平。因此,至关重要的是为此目的制定综合的多标准指标。这篇文章是作者开发了一个评估投资项目效率和风险的综合指标的结果。所开发的积分指标采用矩阵形式。为了编制积分指标,使用了三组标准:定量效率标准、定性效率标准和风险评估标准。我们建议将定性和定量标准分为:1)定义项目商业(经济)效率的标准,2)定义项目预算效率的标准;3) 那些定义其社会效率的人。根据作者的说法,定义相关风险的标准清单应包括宏观经济指标和行业隶属度指标,这些指标可对相应市场的外部经济状况进行全面评估。在评估给定项目的效率和风险时,作者开发的积分指标从矩阵形式转换为易于解释的定量指标。为此,作者建议采用主成分分析和启发式方法(包括排序法和层次分析法)。研究结果可供企业选择投资项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling and optimization of strategies for making individual decisions in multi-agent socio-economic systems with the use of machine learning An intelligent method for generating a list of job profile requirements based on neural network language models using ESCO taxonomy and online job corpus Decision support technology for a seller on a marketplace in a competitive environment The present and future of the digital transformation of real estate: A systematic review of smart real estate A knowledge management system in the strategic development of universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1