Connecting the Science Practices to Teaching and Learning: Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Professed and Intended Beliefs

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Science Teacher Education Pub Date : 2022-10-18 DOI:10.1080/1046560X.2022.2130258
Adam Bennion, E. Davis
{"title":"Connecting the Science Practices to Teaching and Learning: Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Professed and Intended Beliefs","authors":"Adam Bennion, E. Davis","doi":"10.1080/1046560X.2022.2130258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Preservice elementary teachers need to be able to engage young students in science practices but may not have extensive experiences with those practices. They also may have contrasting beliefs about them, which inform their teaching practice. To understand preservice teachers’ beliefs related to science practices, we focus on the connections they made between the practices and teaching and learning. We followed nine participants from a physics content course, into a science methods course, and through their student teaching, collecting data including interviews, reflections, and lesson plans. We used our analyses of interviews and reflections to identify participants’ “professed beliefs,” and of lesson plans to identify “intended beliefs”; from the analysis, we developed a description of teaching and learning beliefs such as Autonomy & Curiosity and Develop Scientific Skills. The professed and intended beliefs of the participants formed connected clusters. We also found cases where these beliefs conflicted conceptually (e.g., when deciding to include many or fewer practices in each lesson or if the science practices are unique to science or can be applied generally). Our findings suggest that teacher educators need to be aware of more than just the professed beliefs of their preservice teachers. They should look for evidence of these beliefs in preservice teachers’ intentions as well.","PeriodicalId":47326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"645 - 666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2130258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Preservice elementary teachers need to be able to engage young students in science practices but may not have extensive experiences with those practices. They also may have contrasting beliefs about them, which inform their teaching practice. To understand preservice teachers’ beliefs related to science practices, we focus on the connections they made between the practices and teaching and learning. We followed nine participants from a physics content course, into a science methods course, and through their student teaching, collecting data including interviews, reflections, and lesson plans. We used our analyses of interviews and reflections to identify participants’ “professed beliefs,” and of lesson plans to identify “intended beliefs”; from the analysis, we developed a description of teaching and learning beliefs such as Autonomy & Curiosity and Develop Scientific Skills. The professed and intended beliefs of the participants formed connected clusters. We also found cases where these beliefs conflicted conceptually (e.g., when deciding to include many or fewer practices in each lesson or if the science practices are unique to science or can be applied generally). Our findings suggest that teacher educators need to be aware of more than just the professed beliefs of their preservice teachers. They should look for evidence of these beliefs in preservice teachers’ intentions as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将科学实践与教学联系起来:保持小学教师的专业信念和意向信念
职前小学教师需要能够让年轻学生参与科学实践,但可能没有丰富的实践经验。他们也可能对他们有不同的信念,这影响了他们的教学实践。为了了解职前教师与科学实践相关的信念,我们关注他们在实践与教与学之间建立的联系。我们跟踪了9位参与者,从物理内容课程到科学方法课程,并通过他们的学生教学,收集了包括访谈、反思和教案在内的数据。我们通过对访谈和反思的分析来确定参与者的“公开信仰”,并通过对教案的分析来确定“预期信仰”;从分析中,我们发展了自主性和好奇心以及发展科学技能等教学信念的描述。参与者的公开信仰和预期信仰形成了相互关联的集群。我们还发现了这些信念在概念上发生冲突的情况(例如,当决定在每节课中包括许多或更少的实践时,或者科学实践是科学独有的还是可以普遍应用)。我们的研究结果表明,教师教育者需要意识到的不仅仅是他们职前教师的公开信仰。他们也应该在职前教师的意图中寻找这些信念的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Science Teacher Education
Journal of Science Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Journal of Science Teacher Education (JSTE) is the flagship journal of the Association for Science Teacher Education. It serves as a forum for disseminating high quality research and theoretical position papers concerning preservice and inservice education of science teachers. The Journal features pragmatic articles that offer ways to improve classroom teaching and learning, professional development, and teacher recruitment and retention at pre K-16 levels.
期刊最新文献
Where’s the Peanut Butter? Journaling about Science Practices in Everyday Life Integrating Text Structure Instruction in Science Education: A Design-Based Study What Makes this Lesson Engineering? What Makes it Science? Examining the Thought Processes of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Science Teacher Action Research in Top Tier Science Education Journals: A Review of the Literature Integrated Language and Science & Technology Instruction: A Cognitive Task Analysis of the Required Teacher Expertise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1