Digitalizing Folk Education: A Semiotic Modeling Approach

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Language and Cultural Education Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.2478/jolace-2022-0011
S. Ghosh, Sibansu Mukherjee
{"title":"Digitalizing Folk Education: A Semiotic Modeling Approach","authors":"S. Ghosh, Sibansu Mukherjee","doi":"10.2478/jolace-2022-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cultural legacy, according to UNESCO, includes not only monuments and collections of artefacts, but also traditions and living expressions inherited from our forefathers and passed down to our successors. Folk literature, in the form of poems, lines, and melodies, is a part of cultural legacy, and its preservation for future generations appears to be crucial. The advent of technology in the post-covid era gave rise to a new perspective on the educational system. Folk education, which has never been regarded as a separate discipline in the sphere of primary education, is now in jeopardy as it is losing its cultural heritage in this digital age. It can only be preserved if it can be linked to newly developed technologies. The current research proposes the Socio-Digital Knowledge System, or SDKS, in light of this. This model deals with the detour of transition from the ‘as is’ to the ‘as ought to be’ reality, which can be considered the main grounds of folk education. The status ‘as it is’ of folk society represents the remaining varieties, not yet to be accounted for by any other educational developmental agencies. There may not be such instances of ‘remaining varieties’ in real. On the other hand, the ‘as ought to be’ educational system remains under development determined by surrounding political and socio-cultural parameters. This effort focuses on the nature of the psychology of the monolingual speakers’ collective self when they are obliged to maintain a tumultuous social environment with two poles, ‘as it is’ and ‘as it ought to be.’ In Indian communities, our model focuses on the ambiguous interpretation of social mobilization and hierarchy principles, as well as the imprecise term ‘class.’ To comprehend the mentioned bipolar possibility in terms of educational growth, we employ semiotic devices as a methodology.","PeriodicalId":41689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Cultural Education","volume":"10 1","pages":"63 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Cultural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2022-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Cultural legacy, according to UNESCO, includes not only monuments and collections of artefacts, but also traditions and living expressions inherited from our forefathers and passed down to our successors. Folk literature, in the form of poems, lines, and melodies, is a part of cultural legacy, and its preservation for future generations appears to be crucial. The advent of technology in the post-covid era gave rise to a new perspective on the educational system. Folk education, which has never been regarded as a separate discipline in the sphere of primary education, is now in jeopardy as it is losing its cultural heritage in this digital age. It can only be preserved if it can be linked to newly developed technologies. The current research proposes the Socio-Digital Knowledge System, or SDKS, in light of this. This model deals with the detour of transition from the ‘as is’ to the ‘as ought to be’ reality, which can be considered the main grounds of folk education. The status ‘as it is’ of folk society represents the remaining varieties, not yet to be accounted for by any other educational developmental agencies. There may not be such instances of ‘remaining varieties’ in real. On the other hand, the ‘as ought to be’ educational system remains under development determined by surrounding political and socio-cultural parameters. This effort focuses on the nature of the psychology of the monolingual speakers’ collective self when they are obliged to maintain a tumultuous social environment with two poles, ‘as it is’ and ‘as it ought to be.’ In Indian communities, our model focuses on the ambiguous interpretation of social mobilization and hierarchy principles, as well as the imprecise term ‘class.’ To comprehend the mentioned bipolar possibility in terms of educational growth, we employ semiotic devices as a methodology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化民间教育:符号学建模方法
根据联合国教科文组织的说法,文化遗产不仅包括纪念碑和文物收藏,还包括从我们的祖先那里继承并传给我们的继任者的传统和生活方式。民间文学,以诗歌、线条和旋律的形式,是文化遗产的一部分,为子孙后代保存似乎至关重要。后新冠时代技术的出现为教育系统带来了新的视角。民间教育从来没有被视为初等教育领域的一个独立学科,但现在正处于危险之中,因为它正在这个数字时代失去其文化遗产。只有将其与新开发的技术联系起来,它才能得到保护。鉴于此,目前的研究提出了社会数字知识系统(SDKS)。这种模式处理了从“现状”向“应该是”现实过渡的迂回,这可以被认为是民间教育的主要依据。民间社会的“现状”代表了剩余的多样性,任何其他教育发展机构都没有考虑到这一点。事实上可能没有这样的“剩余品种”。另一方面,“本应如此”的教育体系仍在发展中,这是由周围的政治和社会文化参数决定的。这项研究的重点是,当单语使用者被迫维持一个有两极的动荡社会环境时,他们的集体自我的心理性质,“现状”和“本应如此”。在印度社区,我们的模型侧重于对社会动员和等级原则的模糊解释,以及不精确的术语“阶级”为了从教育成长的角度理解上述两极可能性,我们采用符号学手段作为一种方法论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Language and Cultural Education
Journal of Language and Cultural Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parents’ attitudes to compulsory preschool education in the Czech Republic and Slovakia The phenomenon of institutional preschool education from the parents’ perspective Variables to consider upon having decided to include pragmatics in the teaching of languages Technics, Perception, Différance Narrating the Seeing-Machine? An examination of the educational and instructional facets in isiXhosa children’s oral songs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1