Accepting the unacceptable? Exploring how acceptance relates to quality of life and death anxiety in a cancer population

Lucinda J. Brabbins, Nima G. Moghaddam, David L. Dawson
{"title":"Accepting the unacceptable? Exploring how acceptance relates to quality of life and death anxiety in a cancer population","authors":"Lucinda J. Brabbins, Nima G. Moghaddam, David L. Dawson","doi":"10.35241/emeraldopenres.13524.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Quality of life is a core concern for cancer patients, which can be negatively affected by illness-related death anxiety; yet understanding of how to appropriately target psycho-oncological interventions remains lacking. We aimed to explore experiential acceptance in cancer patients, and whether acceptance – as an alternative to avoidant coping – was related to and predictive of better quality of life and death anxiety outcomes. Methods: We used a longitudinal, quantitative design with a follow-up after three months. Seventy-two participants completed a questionnaire-battery measuring illness appraisals, acceptance and non-acceptance coping-styles, quality of life, and death anxiety; 31 participants repeated the battery after three months. Results: Acceptance was an independent explanatory and predictive variable for quality of life and death anxiety, in the direction of psychological health. Acceptance had greater explanatory power for outcomes than either cancer appraisals or avoidant response styles. Avoidant response styles were associated with greater death anxiety and poorer quality of life. Conclusions: The findings support the role of an accepting response-style in favourable psychological outcomes, identifying a possible target for future psychological intervention. Response styles that might be encouraged in other therapies, such as active coping, planning, and positive reframing, were not associated with beneficial outcomes.","PeriodicalId":91015,"journal":{"name":"Emerald open research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13524.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Quality of life is a core concern for cancer patients, which can be negatively affected by illness-related death anxiety; yet understanding of how to appropriately target psycho-oncological interventions remains lacking. We aimed to explore experiential acceptance in cancer patients, and whether acceptance – as an alternative to avoidant coping – was related to and predictive of better quality of life and death anxiety outcomes. Methods: We used a longitudinal, quantitative design with a follow-up after three months. Seventy-two participants completed a questionnaire-battery measuring illness appraisals, acceptance and non-acceptance coping-styles, quality of life, and death anxiety; 31 participants repeated the battery after three months. Results: Acceptance was an independent explanatory and predictive variable for quality of life and death anxiety, in the direction of psychological health. Acceptance had greater explanatory power for outcomes than either cancer appraisals or avoidant response styles. Avoidant response styles were associated with greater death anxiety and poorer quality of life. Conclusions: The findings support the role of an accepting response-style in favourable psychological outcomes, identifying a possible target for future psychological intervention. Response styles that might be encouraged in other therapies, such as active coping, planning, and positive reframing, were not associated with beneficial outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受不可接受的?探讨癌症人群的接受度与生活质量和死亡焦虑的关系
背景:生活质量是癌症患者关注的核心问题,与疾病相关的死亡焦虑会对其产生负面影响;然而,对如何适当针对心理肿瘤学干预措施的理解仍然缺乏。我们的目的是探索癌症患者的经验接受,以及接受——作为避免性应对的一种替代方式——是否与更好的生活质量和死亡焦虑结果相关并可预测。方法:采用纵向定量设计,三个月后随访。72名参与者完成了一组问卷,测量疾病评估、接受和不接受的应对方式、生活质量和死亡焦虑;31名参与者在三个月后重复使用电池。结果:在心理健康方面,接受度是生活质量和死亡焦虑的独立解释和预测变量。接受对结果的解释力大于癌症评估或逃避反应风格。回避反应方式与更大的死亡焦虑和较差的生活质量有关。结论:研究结果支持接受反应风格在有利的心理结果中的作用,确定了未来心理干预的可能目标。其他疗法中可能鼓励的反应方式,如积极应对、计划和积极重构,与有益结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Paradoxes and dilemmas of responsible leadership in the mining industries of emerging economies – it is complex Secondary school teachers' perception of quality management practices in Ethiopia: Implications for quality education for all On the global emergence of responsible leadership: purpose and social identity Estimating annual average daily traffic (AADT) data on low-volume roads with the cokriging technique and census/population data Family violence screening and disclosure response: A public mental health service consumer survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1