Nerve Conduction Studies in Patients with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Caused by Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation

IF 1.6 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2020-11-16 DOI:10.1155/2020/8882387
Safa Yousif, A. Ahmed, A. Abdelhai, A. Musa
{"title":"Nerve Conduction Studies in Patients with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Caused by Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation","authors":"Safa Yousif, A. Ahmed, A. Abdelhai, A. Musa","doi":"10.1155/2020/8882387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) are electrodiagnostic tests used to evaluate peripheral nerves functions and aid in the assessment of patients with neuromuscular complaints. There is contrasting evidence concerning the use of NCS in the assessment of patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy. Objectives. This study was conducted to evaluate nerve conduction studies abnormalities in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy and to find out their relation to abnormal physical examination findings. Materials and Methods. Twenty-seven patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy caused by L4/5 or L5/S1 intervertebral disc prolapse confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were recruited in the study. Twenty-five healthy subjects matched in age and sex served as control. Motor nerve conduction study bilaterally for both common peroneal and tibial nerves, F-wave for both nerves, and H-reflex had been conducted. Results. No significant difference was found in the motor nerve conduction study parameters (latency, amplitude, and conduction velocity) between the patients group and the control group. There was significant prolongation in H-reflex latency of both symptomatic and asymptomatic side in the patients group compared to the control group (\n \n P\n <\n 0.05\n \n ). Also, F-wave latencies (F minimum, F maximum, and F mean) of the tibial nerve were significantly prolonged (\n \n P\n <\n 0.05\n \n ) compared to control. Conclusion. Prolonged H-reflex latency was the commonest encountered abnormality in our study followed by F-wave latencies of the tibial nerve.","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/8882387","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8882387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) are electrodiagnostic tests used to evaluate peripheral nerves functions and aid in the assessment of patients with neuromuscular complaints. There is contrasting evidence concerning the use of NCS in the assessment of patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy. Objectives. This study was conducted to evaluate nerve conduction studies abnormalities in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy and to find out their relation to abnormal physical examination findings. Materials and Methods. Twenty-seven patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy caused by L4/5 or L5/S1 intervertebral disc prolapse confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were recruited in the study. Twenty-five healthy subjects matched in age and sex served as control. Motor nerve conduction study bilaterally for both common peroneal and tibial nerves, F-wave for both nerves, and H-reflex had been conducted. Results. No significant difference was found in the motor nerve conduction study parameters (latency, amplitude, and conduction velocity) between the patients group and the control group. There was significant prolongation in H-reflex latency of both symptomatic and asymptomatic side in the patients group compared to the control group ( P < 0.05 ). Also, F-wave latencies (F minimum, F maximum, and F mean) of the tibial nerve were significantly prolonged ( P < 0.05 ) compared to control. Conclusion. Prolonged H-reflex latency was the commonest encountered abnormality in our study followed by F-wave latencies of the tibial nerve.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎间盘突出症致腰骶神经根病的神经传导研究
背景。神经传导研究(NCS)是一种用于评估周围神经功能和帮助评估神经肌肉疾病患者的电诊断测试。在腰骶神经根病患者的评估中使用NCS有不同的证据。目标。本研究旨在评估腰骶神经根病患者神经传导研究异常,并探讨其与异常体检结果的关系。材料与方法。选取27例经磁共振成像(MRI)证实为L4/5或L5/S1椎间盘突出引起的腰骶神经根病患者。25名年龄和性别相匹配的健康受试者作为对照组。对双侧腓总神经和胫总神经进行运动神经传导研究,对双侧腓总神经和胫总神经进行f波和h反射。结果。在运动神经传导研究参数(潜伏期、振幅、传导速度)方面,患者组与对照组无显著差异。与对照组相比,患者组症状侧和无症状侧的h反射潜伏期均显著延长(P < 0.05)。胫神经F波潜伏期(F最小、F最大、F平均)较对照组明显延长(P < 0.05)。结论。延长的h反射潜伏期是我们研究中最常见的异常,其次是胫骨神经的f波潜伏期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid at Hospital Admission on Blood Transfusion Rates in Geriatric Extracapsular Hip Fracture Patients. A Comparison of Functional Outcomes and Cost of Rehabilitation Treatment in the Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in a Geriatric Population Between Two Different Wrist Joint Immobilization Positions at One-Year Follow-Up. Correlation Between Postoperative Pain Intensity and Perioperative Blood Loss After Total Knee Arthroplasty. When Should I Be Associating a Lateral Extra-Articular Procedure to My Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? AI vs. Surgeon Decision-Making. Model for Calculating Impact Force for Individualized Hip Fracture Prediction During a Fall.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1