Conceptual model of knowledge management system for scholarly publication cycle in academic institution

IF 2.7 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems Pub Date : 2022-12-08 DOI:10.1108/vjikms-08-2021-0163
Deden Sumirat Hidayat, D. I. Sensuse, Damayanti Elisabeth, L. M. Hasani
{"title":"Conceptual model of knowledge management system for scholarly publication cycle in academic institution","authors":"Deden Sumirat Hidayat, D. I. Sensuse, Damayanti Elisabeth, L. M. Hasani","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-08-2021-0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nStudy on knowledge-based systems for scientific publications is growing very broadly. However, most of these studies do not explicitly discuss the knowledge management (KM) component as knowledge management system (KMS) implementation. This background causes academic institutions to face challenges in developing KMS to support scholarly publication cycle (SPC). Therefore, this study aims to develop a new KMS conceptual model, Identify critical components and provide research gap opportunities for future KM studies on SPC.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study used a systematic literature review (SLR) method with the procedure from Kitchenham et al. Then, the SLR results are compiled into a conceptual model design based on a framework on KM foundations and KM solutions. Finally, the model design was validated through interviews with related field experts.\n\n\nFindings\nThe KMS for SPC focuses on the discovery, sharing and application of knowledge. The majority of KMS use recommendation systems technology with content-based filtering and collaborative filtering personalization approaches. The characteristics data used in KMS for SPC are structured and unstructured. Metadata and article abstracts are considered sufficiently representative of the entire article content to be used as a search tool and can provide recommendations. The KMS model for SPC has layers of KM infrastructure, processes, systems, strategies, outputs and outcomes.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study has limitations in discussing tacit knowledge. In contrast, tacit knowledge for SPC is essential for scientific publication performance. The tacit knowledge includes experience in searching, writing, submitting, publishing and disseminating scientific publications. Tacit knowledge plays a vital role in the development of knowledge sharing system (KSS) and KCS. Therefore, KSS and KCS for SPC are still very challenging to be researched in the future. KMS opportunities that might be developed further are lessons learned databases and interactive forums that capture tacit knowledge about SPC. Future work potential could identify other types of KMS in academia and focus more on SPC.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study proposes a novel comprehensive KMS model to support scientific publication performance. This model has a critical path as a KMS implementation solution for SPC. This model proposes and recommends appropriate components for SPC requirements (KM processes, technology, methods/techniques and data). This study also proposes novel research gaps as KMS research opportunities for SPC in the future.\n","PeriodicalId":45590,"journal":{"name":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-08-2021-0163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Study on knowledge-based systems for scientific publications is growing very broadly. However, most of these studies do not explicitly discuss the knowledge management (KM) component as knowledge management system (KMS) implementation. This background causes academic institutions to face challenges in developing KMS to support scholarly publication cycle (SPC). Therefore, this study aims to develop a new KMS conceptual model, Identify critical components and provide research gap opportunities for future KM studies on SPC. Design/methodology/approach This study used a systematic literature review (SLR) method with the procedure from Kitchenham et al. Then, the SLR results are compiled into a conceptual model design based on a framework on KM foundations and KM solutions. Finally, the model design was validated through interviews with related field experts. Findings The KMS for SPC focuses on the discovery, sharing and application of knowledge. The majority of KMS use recommendation systems technology with content-based filtering and collaborative filtering personalization approaches. The characteristics data used in KMS for SPC are structured and unstructured. Metadata and article abstracts are considered sufficiently representative of the entire article content to be used as a search tool and can provide recommendations. The KMS model for SPC has layers of KM infrastructure, processes, systems, strategies, outputs and outcomes. Research limitations/implications This study has limitations in discussing tacit knowledge. In contrast, tacit knowledge for SPC is essential for scientific publication performance. The tacit knowledge includes experience in searching, writing, submitting, publishing and disseminating scientific publications. Tacit knowledge plays a vital role in the development of knowledge sharing system (KSS) and KCS. Therefore, KSS and KCS for SPC are still very challenging to be researched in the future. KMS opportunities that might be developed further are lessons learned databases and interactive forums that capture tacit knowledge about SPC. Future work potential could identify other types of KMS in academia and focus more on SPC. Originality/value This study proposes a novel comprehensive KMS model to support scientific publication performance. This model has a critical path as a KMS implementation solution for SPC. This model proposes and recommends appropriate components for SPC requirements (KM processes, technology, methods/techniques and data). This study also proposes novel research gaps as KMS research opportunities for SPC in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术机构学术出版周期知识管理系统概念模型
目的基于知识的科学出版物系统的研究日益广泛。然而,这些研究大多没有明确地将知识管理(KM)组件作为知识管理系统(KMS)的实施进行讨论。这种背景使得学术机构在开发知识管理系统以支持学术出版周期(SPC)方面面临挑战。因此,本研究旨在建立一个新的知识管理概念模型,识别关键成分,并为未来的知识管理研究提供研究缺口机会。设计/方法学/方法本研究采用系统文献综述(SLR)方法,程序来自Kitchenham等人。然后,基于知识管理基础和知识管理解决方案的框架,将SLR结果汇编成概念模型设计。最后,通过对相关领域专家的访谈对模型设计进行验证。SPC的知识管理体系注重知识的发现、共享和应用。大多数KMS使用基于内容的过滤和个性化协同过滤的推荐系统技术。用于SPC的KMS中使用的特征数据分为结构化和非结构化。元数据和文章摘要被认为足以代表整个文章内容,可以用作搜索工具并提供推荐。SPC的知识管理系统模型包含知识管理基础设施、过程、系统、策略、输出和结果等层次。研究的局限性/启示本研究在讨论隐性知识方面存在局限性。相比之下,SPC的隐性知识对科学出版绩效至关重要。隐性知识包括科学出版物的检索、撰写、提交、出版和传播经验。隐性知识在知识共享系统和知识控制系统的发展中起着至关重要的作用。因此,面向SPC的KSS和KCS在未来仍是一个非常具有挑战性的研究课题。可以进一步开发KMS的机会是经验教训数据库和获取关于SPC的隐性知识的交互式论坛。未来的工作潜力可以确定学术界其他类型的KMS,并更多地关注SPC。原创性/价值本研究提出一种新颖的综合知识管理系统模型来支持科学发表绩效。该模型具有作为SPC的KMS实现解决方案的关键路径。该模型提出并推荐适合SPC要求的组件(KM过程、技术、方法/技术和数据)。本研究还提出了新的研究缺口,作为未来SPC的KMS研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Does ethical climate of the organization foster entrepreneurial marketing? The role of work engagement and effective knowledge transfer Knowledge capitalization and perceived fairness of reward in real estate sector: mediating role of shared leadership Role of artificial intelligence (AI) in poverty alleviation: a bibliometric analysis Adopting knowledge-sharing-driven blockchain technology in healthcare: a developing country’s perspective Knowledge sharing in open-source software development communities: a review and synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1