Perceptions on Adverbial Mobility in TESOL

IF 0.4 Q4 LINGUISTICS Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-12 DOI:10.14483/22487085.16922
J. O. Ahaotu
{"title":"Perceptions on Adverbial Mobility in TESOL","authors":"J. O. Ahaotu","doi":"10.14483/22487085.16922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the perceptions of teachers of English on adverbial mobility in order to determine how far it would be accurate to claim that adverbs are mobile. The researcher adopted the Lexical Approach, an alternative to traditional grammar-based foreign language teaching methodologies, as the framework for the study. The reliability of the study was demonstrated with a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0,83. The study approach was quasi-scientific, as the researcher administered a questionnaire on 50 respondents who are all English language teachers in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. The data obtained were analyzed using Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient. The summary of the responses contrasts the more general perception of adverbs and adverbial groups as a highly mobile category that may be put in any sentential positions without altering meaning. Based on the opinion of a majority of the respondents in the study, the researcher concluded that they perceived adverbs as restrictively mobile and agreed that mobility presents challenges to their students’ use of adverbs. The study recommended, among other things, that teachers of English in TESOL contexts should incorporate the Lexical Approach in teaching adverbs and communication skills because the methodology enhances oral and written fluency as well as grammaticality.","PeriodicalId":10484,"journal":{"name":"Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.16922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examined the perceptions of teachers of English on adverbial mobility in order to determine how far it would be accurate to claim that adverbs are mobile. The researcher adopted the Lexical Approach, an alternative to traditional grammar-based foreign language teaching methodologies, as the framework for the study. The reliability of the study was demonstrated with a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0,83. The study approach was quasi-scientific, as the researcher administered a questionnaire on 50 respondents who are all English language teachers in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. The data obtained were analyzed using Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient. The summary of the responses contrasts the more general perception of adverbs and adverbial groups as a highly mobile category that may be put in any sentential positions without altering meaning. Based on the opinion of a majority of the respondents in the study, the researcher concluded that they perceived adverbs as restrictively mobile and agreed that mobility presents challenges to their students’ use of adverbs. The study recommended, among other things, that teachers of English in TESOL contexts should incorporate the Lexical Approach in teaching adverbs and communication skills because the methodology enhances oral and written fluency as well as grammaticality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对英语外语教学中状语移动的认知
本研究考察了英语教师对副词流动性的看法,以确定在多大程度上声称副词是流动的准确程度。研究者采用了一种替代传统的以语法为基础的外语教学方法——词汇教学法作为研究框架。Cronbach 's alpha值为0.83,证明了研究的可靠性。研究方法是准科学的,因为研究者对50名受访者进行了问卷调查,他们都是尼日利亚哈科特港的英语教师。所得数据采用Spearman秩相关系数进行分析。对回答的总结对比了更普遍的看法,即副词和副词组是一个高度流动的类别,可以放在任何句子位置而不改变意义。根据研究中大多数受访者的意见,研究人员得出结论,他们认为副词具有限制性的移动性,并同意移动性对学生使用副词提出了挑战。该研究建议,在TESOL环境下的英语教师应该将词汇法纳入副词和沟通技巧的教学中,因为这种方法可以提高口语和写作的流利性以及语法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Listening to CLIL Practitioners Authentic Materials And Task Design: A Teaching Amalgam English teachers’ perceptions of Task-Based Instruction in Risaralda, Colombia. Teacher-Made Materials Based on Meaningful Learning to Foster Writing Skills. Functional Analysis of Linking Adverbials in Chemistry and English Language Teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1