A Systematic Review of E-Books in Academic Libraries: Access, Advantages, and Usage

IF 1.9 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE New Review of Academic Librarianship Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13614533.2018.1524390
Barbara A. Blummer, Jeffrey M. Kenton
{"title":"A Systematic Review of E-Books in Academic Libraries: Access, Advantages, and Usage","authors":"Barbara A. Blummer, Jeffrey M. Kenton","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2018.1524390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents a systematic review of E-book user studies from 2001 to 2017. It focused on qualitative and quantitative studies that examined academic user groups’ attitudes and interactions with E-books. The review aimed to reveal users’ knowledge of the E-book format, their ability to define an E-book, their awareness of E-books’ availabilities from the institutions’ libraries, as well as their appreciation of E-books’ advantages. The authors also considered respondents’ usage of E-books such as the devices that fostered E-book access, internet avenues individuals’ utilized to locate the materials, printing and downloading of E-books, and the time individuals’ spent reading E-books online and the frequency of their access. The literature illustrated the importance of E-books to all members of the academic community for research and coursework. Still, studies pointed to a lack of awareness or familiarity among students, faculty, and staff of their institution’s E-books especially with the format’s features and the various collections owned by the university. To that end, it is especially critical that librarians promote E-books to all potential users.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"26 1","pages":"109 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2018.1524390","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2018.1524390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Abstract This article presents a systematic review of E-book user studies from 2001 to 2017. It focused on qualitative and quantitative studies that examined academic user groups’ attitudes and interactions with E-books. The review aimed to reveal users’ knowledge of the E-book format, their ability to define an E-book, their awareness of E-books’ availabilities from the institutions’ libraries, as well as their appreciation of E-books’ advantages. The authors also considered respondents’ usage of E-books such as the devices that fostered E-book access, internet avenues individuals’ utilized to locate the materials, printing and downloading of E-books, and the time individuals’ spent reading E-books online and the frequency of their access. The literature illustrated the importance of E-books to all members of the academic community for research and coursework. Still, studies pointed to a lack of awareness or familiarity among students, faculty, and staff of their institution’s E-books especially with the format’s features and the various collections owned by the university. To that end, it is especially critical that librarians promote E-books to all potential users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高校图书馆电子图书的系统评价:获取、优势与使用
本文对2001年至2017年的电子书用户研究进行了系统回顾。它侧重于定性和定量研究,研究学术用户群体对电子书的态度和互动。该调查旨在揭示用户对电子书格式的了解程度、他们定义电子书的能力、他们对各机构图书馆可获得电子书的了解程度,以及他们对电子书优势的欣赏程度。作者还考虑了受访者对电子书的使用情况,如促进电子书访问的设备,个人用于查找材料的互联网渠道,电子书的打印和下载,以及个人在线阅读电子书的时间和访问频率。这些文献说明了电子书对学术界所有成员的研究和课程的重要性。然而,研究指出,学生、教师和工作人员对他们学校的电子书缺乏认识或熟悉,尤其是对这种格式的特点和学校拥有的各种藏书。为此,图书馆员向所有潜在用户推广电子书尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
New Review of Academic Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Workplace Empowerment and Librarianship: A Perception of Female Employees in Pakistan “Decolonising and diversifying the Library through student partnerships” Decolonising DMU: Reflections on changes, challenges and impact with an eye towards the future Diversifying, Decentring and Decolonising academic libraries: A literature review Use of e-library services by postgraduate students at Mzuzu University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1