Murdered Father, Dead Father and Other Work by Rosine Perelberg (review)

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AMERICAN IMAGO Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1353/aim.2022.0032
R. Davies
{"title":"Murdered Father, Dead Father and Other Work by Rosine Perelberg (review)","authors":"R. Davies","doi":"10.1353/aim.2022.0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Tommy, go and clear up your toys now,” Jake barked at his three-year-old son. Seemingly unmoved by his father’s order, Tommy shifted closer to his mother and asked, “Mummy, when is Daddy going to die?” Encapsulated in such a simple if dramatic encounter are the complex derivatives of Freud’s Oedipus complex. As outlined by Rosine Perelberg in her work over the last decades, these complexities cover “the murder of the father, identification and super ego, the setting up of the ego ideal, castration complex, desexualization and sublimation” (2016, p. 126). In one of her three books of selected papers, Murdered Father, Dead Father (2016), she counters what she sees as a drift away from a recognition of the primacy of the Oedipus complex. It is a compelling endeavor, placing little Tommy’s psychic construction of the world center stage. Perelberg’s prolific psychoanalytic writing is characterized by an invitation to absorb complexity but also to associate freely. In her clinical practice demonstrated throughout her work by clinical accounts, she describes how there is no place for the omnipotent analyst, but rather the analyst inaugurates a process (Perelberg, 2016, p. 76). Clinical work is characterized by such things as the open interpretation, the special form of listening, and a scrupulous and compassionate attention to the patient’s lived experience. My contribution to a wider knowledge of Perelberg’s work is offered in the context of “inaugurating a process.” Perelberg provides a rigorously argued psychoanalytic theory, never too far away from the consulting room. Throughout her work, Perelberg (2020) interrogates the centrality of what she calls the myth of origins, how can one be made of two:","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN IMAGO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2022.0032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Tommy, go and clear up your toys now,” Jake barked at his three-year-old son. Seemingly unmoved by his father’s order, Tommy shifted closer to his mother and asked, “Mummy, when is Daddy going to die?” Encapsulated in such a simple if dramatic encounter are the complex derivatives of Freud’s Oedipus complex. As outlined by Rosine Perelberg in her work over the last decades, these complexities cover “the murder of the father, identification and super ego, the setting up of the ego ideal, castration complex, desexualization and sublimation” (2016, p. 126). In one of her three books of selected papers, Murdered Father, Dead Father (2016), she counters what she sees as a drift away from a recognition of the primacy of the Oedipus complex. It is a compelling endeavor, placing little Tommy’s psychic construction of the world center stage. Perelberg’s prolific psychoanalytic writing is characterized by an invitation to absorb complexity but also to associate freely. In her clinical practice demonstrated throughout her work by clinical accounts, she describes how there is no place for the omnipotent analyst, but rather the analyst inaugurates a process (Perelberg, 2016, p. 76). Clinical work is characterized by such things as the open interpretation, the special form of listening, and a scrupulous and compassionate attention to the patient’s lived experience. My contribution to a wider knowledge of Perelberg’s work is offered in the context of “inaugurating a process.” Perelberg provides a rigorously argued psychoanalytic theory, never too far away from the consulting room. Throughout her work, Perelberg (2020) interrogates the centrality of what she calls the myth of origins, how can one be made of two:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗辛·佩雷伯格的《被谋杀的父亲、死去的父亲和其他作品》(评论)
“汤米,现在去收拾你的玩具,”杰克对着他三岁的儿子咆哮道。汤米似乎对父亲的命令无动于衷,他走近母亲问道:“妈妈,爸爸什么时候会死?”弗洛伊德的俄狄浦斯情结的复杂衍生物就包含在这样一场简单但戏剧性的遭遇中。正如Rosine Perelberg在过去几十年的作品中所概述的那样,这些复杂性涵盖了“父亲的谋杀、身份认同和超我、自我理想的建立、阉割情结、无性化和升华”(2016,第126页)。在她的三本精选论文之一《被谋杀的父亲,死去的父亲》(2016)中,她反驳了她所认为的对俄狄浦斯情结首要地位的认识偏离。这是一项引人注目的努力,将小汤米的世界心理建构置于舞台中心。佩雷伯格多产的精神分析写作的特点是既能吸收复杂性,又能自由联想。在她的临床实践中,她通过临床账户展示了她的整个工作,她描述了全能的分析师没有立足之地,而是分析师开启了一个过程(Perelberg,2016,p.76)。临床工作的特点是开放的解释,特殊的倾听形式,以及对患者生活经历的谨慎和同情。我对佩雷伯格工作的更广泛了解是在“开启一个过程”的背景下提供的。佩雷伯格提供了一个经过严格论证的精神分析理论,从未远离咨询室。在她的整个作品中,Perelberg(2020)质疑她所说的起源神话的中心性,一个如何由两个组成:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN IMAGO
AMERICAN IMAGO HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Founded in 1939 by Sigmund Freud and Hanns Sachs, AMERICAN IMAGO is the preeminent scholarly journal of psychoanalysis. Appearing quarterly, AMERICAN IMAGO publishes innovative articles on the history and theory of psychoanalysis as well as on the reciprocal relations between psychoanalysis and the broad range of disciplines that constitute the human sciences. Since 2001, the journal has been edited by Peter L. Rudnytsky, who has made each issue a "special issue" and introduced a topical book review section, with a guest editor for every Fall issue.
期刊最新文献
"Anything of Note": Recovering "Lost Life" in the Psychoanalytic Archive Freud and Marie Bonaparte's Correspondence (1925–1939): An Intimate Relationship Nabokov and Freud: Solus Rex vs Oedipus Rex Understanding the Phenomenon of Negative Myths The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis ed. by Vera J. Camden (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1