首页 > 最新文献

AMERICAN IMAGO最新文献

英文 中文
"Anything of Note": Recovering "Lost Life" in the Psychoanalytic Archive "任何值得注意的东西":在精神分析档案中找回 "失去的生活
IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1353/aim.2024.a932376
Vanessa Smith

Abstract:

This essay engages with the hitherto embargoed letters, drawings and case notes of Stella Coomber ("Susan"), the subject of Marion Milner's case history The Hands of the Living God. Using these documents as a starting point, I decode the identities of medical staff, institutions, and contacts whose names are disguised in Milner's book, and reconstruct some of Stella's life behind the scenes of, and after, Hands. The letters disclose her project of writing an autobiographical companion volume to Milner's, a project which was never realized. In later letters Stella is increasingly despondent about her failure to write this book, feeling that her life has been wasted, for she has not produced "anything of note." The essay suggests that there is a way of reading her "notes" as themselves both autobiography and counter case-history. I approach Stella's correspondence as a piece of life writing: not a traditional narrative, but one whose fragmentary form gives expression to her complex and exemplary experience.

摘要:这篇文章探讨了玛丽恩-米尔纳(Marion Milner)的病例史《永生上帝之手》(The Hands of the Living God)的主题人物斯特拉-库姆伯(Stella Coomber,"Susan")迄今为止禁止公开的信件、图画和病例记录。以这些文件为起点,我解读了米尔纳书中伪装的医务人员、机构和联系人的身份,并重建了斯特拉在《活神仙之手》幕后和之后的一些生活。信中披露了她想为米尔纳的书写一本自传体同名书的计划,但这一计划从未实现。在后来的信中,斯特拉对未能写成这本书越来越感到绝望,她觉得自己的生命被浪费了,因为她没有写出 "任何值得注意的东西"。这篇文章认为,有一种方法可以将她的 "笔记 "解读为自传和反案例史。我把斯特拉的书信当作一篇人生写作:不是传统意义上的叙事,而是以零散的形式表达了她复杂而典型的经历。
{"title":"\"Anything of Note\": Recovering \"Lost Life\" in the Psychoanalytic Archive","authors":"Vanessa Smith","doi":"10.1353/aim.2024.a932376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a932376","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This essay engages with the hitherto embargoed letters, drawings and case notes of Stella Coomber (\"Susan\"), the subject of Marion Milner's case history <i>The Hands of the Living God</i>. Using these documents as a starting point, I decode the identities of medical staff, institutions, and contacts whose names are disguised in Milner's book, and reconstruct some of Stella's life behind the scenes of, and after, <i>Hands</i>. The letters disclose her project of writing an autobiographical companion volume to Milner's, a project which was never realized. In later letters Stella is increasingly despondent about her failure to write this book, feeling that her life has been wasted, for she has not produced \"anything of note.\" The essay suggests that there is a way of reading her \"notes\" as themselves both autobiography and counter case-history. I approach Stella's correspondence as a piece of life writing: not a traditional narrative, but one whose fragmentary form gives expression to her complex and exemplary experience.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141720908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis ed. by Vera J. Camden (review) Vera J. Camden 编著的《剑桥文学与精神分析指南》(评论)
IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1353/aim.2024.a932382
Murray M. Schwartz
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis</em> ed. by Vera J. Camden <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Murray M. Schwartz (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis</em>, edited by Vera J. Camden. <p>As readers of <em>American Imago</em> know, literature and psychoanalysis have been companions since Freud recognized that the strategies of the mind shared intrinsic features with forms and insights embodied in literature and art. From his earliest writing, Freud told and composed stories to show how apparent chance could be made meaningful. A master stylist himself, he recognized creative writers as his allies in the service of a new science that embraced all cultural forms, including "the science of literature." But, like the course of true love, the relationship has not always been smooth. Constant companions may be fellow travelers or, as etymology and an older meaning has it, "messmates," sharing sustenance, but Freud's valorization of Shakespeare and other writers contained elements of rivalry and ambivalence as well as identification. The paratactical "and" doesn't specify a particular relation either of mutuality or hierarchy.</p> <p><em>The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis</em> offers contemporary examples of the "synergy" of the two fields, with almost uniform success. Camden recounts in her introduction how, particularly in the United States, the status of clinical psychoanalysis was diminished by the 1970s in favor of medical psychiatry, even as "high theory," mostly conveyed by the writings of celebrated French thinkers like Jacques Derrida and Jacques Lacan, ascended in academia. This is true enough, but not the whole story, as the excellent chronology of important works at the beginning of this volume attests. In the academic world, by the 1970s much-maligned ego psychology (in Lacan's rewriting of Freud's concept of the ego) was already yielding spaces for other French analysts, British <strong>[End Page 279]</strong> object relations, self psychology, and D. W. Winnicott's central concepts, as the academy provided humanities education for future psychoanalysts like Christopher Bollas and Adam Phillips, whose influence is prominent in these essays. At the same time, it was not accidental that the theoretical assault on the ego as a "bounded" defensive structure coincided with the emergence of the Holocaust, trauma studies, women's studies, cultural studies, and the aftermath of the Vietnam War, as the American and British academies sought theories that mirrored these concerns and innovations.</p> <p>Overdetermined forces were at work in both fields, including economic pressures on both humanists and psychoanalysts. Within psychoanalysis, the proliferation of new theories challenged orthodoxies and fostered competing
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis ed. by Vera J. Camden Murray M. Schwartz (bio) The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis, edited by Vera J. Camden.正如《美国意象》(American Imago)的读者所知,自从弗洛伊德认识到心灵的策略与文学艺术所体现的形式和洞察力有着内在的共同特征以来,文学和精神分析就一直相伴相随。从他最早的写作开始,弗洛伊德就通过讲述和创作故事来展示如何让表面的偶然变得有意义。他本人也是一位文体大师,他认为有创造力的作家是他的盟友,可以为包括 "文学科学 "在内的所有文化形式在内的新科学服务。但是,就像真爱的过程一样,这种关系并不总是一帆风顺的。恒久不变的伴侣可能是同行者,或者像词源学和一种更古老的含义那样,是 "伴侣",分享养料,但弗洛伊德对莎士比亚和其他作家的赞美包含了竞争和矛盾以及认同的元素。副行为 "和 "并没有指明一种特定的相互关系或等级关系。剑桥文学与精神分析》(Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis)提供了两个领域 "协同作用 "的当代实例,几乎取得了一致的成功。卡姆登在她的导言中叙述了,尤其是在美国,临床精神分析的地位在20世纪70年代如何被削弱,转而支持医学精神病学,甚至当 "高级理论"(主要由雅克-德里达和雅克-拉康等著名法国思想家的著作传达)在学术界崛起时也是如此。这是事实,但并非故事的全部,正如本卷开头的重要著作年表所证明的那样。在学术界,到了20世纪70年代,备受诟病的自我心理学(拉康对弗洛伊德自我概念的改写)已经为其他法国分析家、英国[尾页 279]客体关系学、自我心理学和温尼科特(D. W. Winnicott)的核心概念让出了空间,因为学术界为克里斯托弗-博拉斯(Christopher Bollas)和亚当-菲利普斯(Adam Phillips)等未来的精神分析师提供了人文学科教育,他们的影响在这些文章中非常突出。与此同时,对作为 "有界 "防御结构的自我的理论攻击与大屠杀、创伤研究、妇女研究、文化研究以及越战后遗症的出现不谋而合,这并非偶然,因为美国和英国的学院都在寻求能够反映这些问题和创新的理论。在这两个领域中,都有一些决定性的力量在起作用,其中包括人文学者和精神分析师所面临的经济压力。在精神分析领域,新理论的涌现对正统理论提出了挑战,促进了相互竞争的团体归属以及临床医生之间关于中心概念的复杂对话和争论,使得跨学科教学变得异常具有挑战性,至少在本科阶段是如此。20 世纪 70 年代末,耶鲁大学著名评论家杰弗里-哈特曼(Geoffrey Hartman)感叹道:"精神分析越来越难做,但却有越来越多的人在做。"1 在我看来,20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代学术界的一个核心问题--甚至在 20 世纪 90 年代的 "弗洛伊德战争 "之前--并不是缺乏多样化的精神分析方法,而是对这些方法的灵活运用和它们之间富有成效的对话不够。尤其是在拉康学派的学术界,说教多于教导,而在某些方面却缺乏消极的能力。阿尔弗雷德-马格里斯(Alfred Margulies)在《国际精神分析杂志》(International Journal of Psychoanalysis)上撰文指出,拉康理论 "成为了一场运动,一种全新的精神分析理解与实践的崇拜和文化,丑化了体制"(Marguiles,2014,第1330页)。与此同时,美国培训机构中的分析师候选人也越来越少地接受过实质性的文学教育,尤其是在精神分析的大门向临床心理学家敞开之后。因此,我们非常高兴能在二十一世纪出版这本经过精心编辑、文笔优美的论文集,展示这些相伴领域的当代活力和相互作用,并 "将文学置于精神分析之前"(第 xv 页),就像一份礼物摆在学生、学者和临床医生面前。[剑桥指南》的撰稿人包括英国、美国、南美、西班牙和印度的学者和精神分析师。在 18 篇文章中,16 篇由女性撰写。这些文章探讨的作家和主题多种多样,令人印象深刻:
{"title":"The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis ed. by Vera J. Camden (review)","authors":"Murray M. Schwartz","doi":"10.1353/aim.2024.a932382","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a932382","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis&lt;/em&gt; ed. by Vera J. Camden &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Murray M. Schwartz (bio) &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; &lt;em&gt;The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis&lt;/em&gt;, edited by Vera J. Camden. &lt;p&gt;As readers of &lt;em&gt;American Imago&lt;/em&gt; know, literature and psychoanalysis have been companions since Freud recognized that the strategies of the mind shared intrinsic features with forms and insights embodied in literature and art. From his earliest writing, Freud told and composed stories to show how apparent chance could be made meaningful. A master stylist himself, he recognized creative writers as his allies in the service of a new science that embraced all cultural forms, including \"the science of literature.\" But, like the course of true love, the relationship has not always been smooth. Constant companions may be fellow travelers or, as etymology and an older meaning has it, \"messmates,\" sharing sustenance, but Freud's valorization of Shakespeare and other writers contained elements of rivalry and ambivalence as well as identification. The paratactical \"and\" doesn't specify a particular relation either of mutuality or hierarchy.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis&lt;/em&gt; offers contemporary examples of the \"synergy\" of the two fields, with almost uniform success. Camden recounts in her introduction how, particularly in the United States, the status of clinical psychoanalysis was diminished by the 1970s in favor of medical psychiatry, even as \"high theory,\" mostly conveyed by the writings of celebrated French thinkers like Jacques Derrida and Jacques Lacan, ascended in academia. This is true enough, but not the whole story, as the excellent chronology of important works at the beginning of this volume attests. In the academic world, by the 1970s much-maligned ego psychology (in Lacan's rewriting of Freud's concept of the ego) was already yielding spaces for other French analysts, British &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 279]&lt;/strong&gt; object relations, self psychology, and D. W. Winnicott's central concepts, as the academy provided humanities education for future psychoanalysts like Christopher Bollas and Adam Phillips, whose influence is prominent in these essays. At the same time, it was not accidental that the theoretical assault on the ego as a \"bounded\" defensive structure coincided with the emergence of the Holocaust, trauma studies, women's studies, cultural studies, and the aftermath of the Vietnam War, as the American and British academies sought theories that mirrored these concerns and innovations.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Overdetermined forces were at work in both fields, including economic pressures on both humanists and psychoanalysts. Within psychoanalysis, the proliferation of new theories challenged orthodoxies and fostered competing ","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141720912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nietzsche, Roquentin, and Suicide 尼采、罗昆汀与自杀
IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1353/aim.2024.a932379
Eric v.d. Luft

Abstract:

Sartre's character Roquentin seeing his hand as a crab is analogous in some ways to Nietzsche dreaming a toad on his transparent hand. Examining both of these envisioned animals as metaphors reveals that each represents some sort of physical or psychological disease or pestilence, that each profoundly disturbs the status quo, and that each point in a different way toward suicide, but at the same time that each signifies or symbolizes a deepening of self-knowledge. Both Nietzsche and Roquentin rejected suicide, but for different reasons: the former because he wished to remain in control of his life by consciously accepting his fate, no matter how repulsive it might be; the latter because he was too apathetic and despondent to care whether he lived or died. The purpose of this article is to suggest why depressed, suicidal people might reject suicide.

摘要:萨特笔下的人物罗昆廷把自己的手看成一只螃蟹,在某些方面类似于尼采在自己透明的手上梦见一只癞蛤蟆。将这两种动物作为隐喻来研究,会发现它们都代表着某种生理或心理疾病或瘟疫,都深刻地扰乱了现状,都以不同的方式指向自杀,但同时又都意味着或象征着自我认识的深化。尼采和罗昆廷都拒绝自杀,但原因不同:前者是因为他希望通过有意识地接受自己的命运来掌控自己的人生,无论命运多么令人厌恶;后者则是因为他过于冷漠和绝望,根本不在乎自己的生死。本文的目的是提出抑郁、有自杀倾向的人为什么会拒绝自杀。
{"title":"Nietzsche, Roquentin, and Suicide","authors":"Eric v.d. Luft","doi":"10.1353/aim.2024.a932379","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a932379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>Sartre's character Roquentin seeing his hand as a crab is analogous in some ways to Nietzsche dreaming a toad on his transparent hand. Examining both of these envisioned animals as metaphors reveals that each represents some sort of physical or psychological disease or pestilence, that each profoundly disturbs the status quo, and that each point in a different way toward suicide, but at the same time that each signifies or symbolizes a deepening of self-knowledge. Both Nietzsche and Roquentin rejected suicide, but for different reasons: the former because he wished to remain in control of his life by consciously accepting his fate, no matter how repulsive it might be; the latter because he was too apathetic and despondent to care whether he lived or died. The purpose of this article is to suggest why depressed, suicidal people might reject suicide.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141720913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Freud and Marie Bonaparte's Correspondence (1925–1939): An Intimate Relationship 弗洛伊德与玛丽-波拿巴的通信(1925-1939 年):亲密关系
IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1353/aim.2024.a932377
Francis Baudry

Abstract:

This paper explores the correspondence between Freud and his patient Marie Bonaparte over the course of 14 years and illuminates their complex personal and professional relationship. The letters expose Freud's therapeutic challenges in balancing the theoretical concept of transference and its actual management in Freud's work in the late 1920s and 1930s.

摘要:本文探讨了弗洛伊德和他的病人玛丽-波拿巴之间长达 14 年的通信,揭示了他们之间复杂的个人和专业关系。这些信件揭示了弗洛伊德在 20 世纪 20 年代末和 30 年代的工作中,在平衡移情的理论概念及其实际管理方面所面临的治疗挑战。
{"title":"Freud and Marie Bonaparte's Correspondence (1925–1939): An Intimate Relationship","authors":"Francis Baudry","doi":"10.1353/aim.2024.a932377","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a932377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This paper explores the correspondence between Freud and his patient Marie Bonaparte over the course of 14 years and illuminates their complex personal and professional relationship. The letters expose Freud's therapeutic challenges in balancing the theoretical concept of transference and its actual management in Freud's work in the late 1920s and 1930s.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141720909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by Judith Harris (review) 失去的诗歌:朱迪斯-哈里斯(Judith Harris)的《浪漫与当代哀歌》(评论
IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1353/aim.2024.a932383
Dawn Skorczewski
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies</em> by Judith Harris <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Dawn Skorczewski (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies</em> by Judith Harris <p>The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by poet and critic Judith Harris contributes to studies of the elegy as a genre and to psychoanalytic interpretations of literature. Harris, a poet with a Ph.D. in literature who has published three impressive collections of poetry and a critical volume Signifying Pain (2012), is a rigorous and innovative reader. She addresses the usual suspects in her study: William Wordsworth, John Keats, and Sylvia Plath, as well as lesser-known voices such as Jane Kenyon, Edward Hirsch, and other contemporary poets. This volume is intelligent, probing, and elegant. Harris teaches us to appreciate the poems on the level of genre and line and highlights the theoretical contribution to literary and psychoanalytic studies.</p> <p>Central to the book is the concept of interiority, particularly the question of the grieving speaker's inner life and its external representation in the container of the poem. She questions how the elegy as an externalized form can provide its own source of inner consolation and whether the poem can attest to the relationship between speaker and beloved. Harris also ponders the elegy's extension to the collective experience of loss. In each chapter, Harris explores a distinct psychoanalytic theory, discussing a new poet (or poets) and introducing a novel perspective each time. Her style of writing is clear and engaging, and the depth of her analysis and theoretical arguments is impressive. Throughout the volume, Harris manages a remarkable balance between explication and theory.</p> <p>The introduction explores psychoanalytic theory from Freud to Lacan to Derrida and argues for understanding the elegy as a form that interrogates interiority and interconnection. She questions how the elegy can serve as a form of consolation for those who refuse it. For Harris, the elegy moves in three directions: the first allows the speaker to define themselves <strong>[End Page 297]</strong> through the relationship with the deceased, the second permits the speaker to remain with the deceased through the power of words, and the third serves as a vehicle for the speaker's separation from the beloved via mourning. This tripartite paradox of the elegy as coalescence, container, and conduit animates the volume.</p> <p>In chapters on Wordsworth and Keats, Harris explores the tension between coexistence, container, and conduit and shows that it is inherently religious. These elegies vacillate between the potential of transcendence in the present moment of a poem and the belief that the departed transitions to life in Heaven, leaving th
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 失去的诗歌:朱迪斯-哈里斯(Judith Harris)的《失去的诗歌:浪漫与当代哀歌》(The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by Judith Harris Dawn Skorczewski)(简历):朱迪斯-哈里斯(Judith Harris)的《失去之诗:浪漫与当代哀歌》(The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies):诗人兼评论家朱迪斯-哈里斯(Judith Harris)的这本《失去的诗歌:浪漫主义和当代哀歌》为哀歌这一体裁的研究和文学的精神分析解释做出了贡献。哈里斯是一位拥有文学博士学位的诗人,出版过三部令人印象深刻的诗集和一本评论集《疼痛的象征》(Signifying Pain,2012 年),是一位严谨而富有创新精神的读者。她在研究中涉及了一些常见的人物:威廉-华兹华斯(William Wordsworth)、约翰-济慈(John Keats)和西尔维娅-普拉斯(Sylvia Plath),以及鲜为人知的简-凯尼恩(Jane Kenyon)、爱德华-赫希(Edward Hirsch)和其他当代诗人。这本诗集睿智、敏锐、优雅。哈里斯教我们从体裁和行文的层面来欣赏诗歌,并强调了其对文学和精神分析研究的理论贡献。本书的核心是 "内在性 "的概念,尤其是悲痛者的内心世界及其在诗歌容器中的外在表现。她质疑挽歌作为一种外化的形式,如何能提供自己内心慰藉的源泉,以及诗歌是否能证明说话者与爱人之间的关系。哈里斯还思考了挽歌对失去亲人的集体体验的延伸。在每一章中,哈里斯都会探讨一种独特的精神分析理论,讨论一位(或多位)新诗人,每次都会引入一种新的视角。她的写作风格清晰而引人入胜,其分析和理论论证的深度令人印象深刻。在整本书中,哈里斯在阐述与理论之间取得了出色的平衡。导言探讨了从弗洛伊德到拉康再到德里达的精神分析理论,并主张将挽歌理解为一种拷问内在性和相互联系的形式。她质疑挽歌如何能成为那些拒绝挽歌的人的一种安慰形式。在哈里斯看来,挽歌有三个方向:第一个方向是让说话者通过与逝者的关系来定义自己 [尾页 297];第二个方向是让说话者通过语言的力量与逝者保持联系;第三个方向是作为说话者通过哀悼与爱人分离的载体。挽歌作为凝聚、容器和管道的三重悖论使这本书充满活力。在关于华兹华斯和济慈的章节中,哈里斯探讨了共存、容器和管道之间的紧张关系,并表明这种紧张关系具有内在的宗教性。这些挽歌在诗歌当下的超越潜能与逝者将升入天堂的信念之间徘徊,让生者同时庆祝和哀悼这一旅程。例如,华兹华斯的《我们七岁》(1798 年)将诗歌作为逝去孩子的替代品。另一方面,济慈对亡母和亡兄的持续哀悼则发挥了不同的作用,诗歌成为了复活的场所。在讨论这两首挽歌时,哈里斯发现了弗洛伊德模式的先兆,即在自我中对失去的对象进行内化和投射。第四章转向当代诗人简-凯尼恩(Jane Kenyon),她是浪漫主义诗歌的爱好者,她的《与忧郁过不去》(1993 年)与济慈的《忧郁颂》(1819 年)和弗洛伊德的论文《哀悼与忧郁症》(1918 年)展开了对话。凯尼恩的挽歌更倾向于抑郁和家庭生活的主题,并质疑一个人如何应对自己死亡前的空虚感。研究西尔维娅-普拉斯(Sylvia Plath)的读者会在凯尼恩的诗歌中发现这一主题。然而,第 5 章通过对普拉斯的挽歌《边缘》(1963 年)的解读,对她的传记进行了全新的探究,这是一首自我引导的挽歌。普拉斯的父亲在她很小的时候就去世了,她的母亲告诉她要向前看,把注意力集中在对母亲的感激上。在她的诗歌中,这种反对哀悼的禁令点燃了创作的动力。哈里斯借鉴克莱因的理论,将普拉斯的挽歌视为精致愤怒的容器。在第 6 章和第 7 章中,哈里斯的分析主要集中在普拉斯的挽歌中。
{"title":"The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by Judith Harris (review)","authors":"Dawn Skorczewski","doi":"10.1353/aim.2024.a932383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a932383","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;span&gt;Reviewed by:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; &lt;em&gt;The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies&lt;/em&gt; by Judith Harris &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Dawn Skorczewski (bio) &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; &lt;em&gt;The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies&lt;/em&gt; by Judith Harris &lt;p&gt;The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by poet and critic Judith Harris contributes to studies of the elegy as a genre and to psychoanalytic interpretations of literature. Harris, a poet with a Ph.D. in literature who has published three impressive collections of poetry and a critical volume Signifying Pain (2012), is a rigorous and innovative reader. She addresses the usual suspects in her study: William Wordsworth, John Keats, and Sylvia Plath, as well as lesser-known voices such as Jane Kenyon, Edward Hirsch, and other contemporary poets. This volume is intelligent, probing, and elegant. Harris teaches us to appreciate the poems on the level of genre and line and highlights the theoretical contribution to literary and psychoanalytic studies.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Central to the book is the concept of interiority, particularly the question of the grieving speaker's inner life and its external representation in the container of the poem. She questions how the elegy as an externalized form can provide its own source of inner consolation and whether the poem can attest to the relationship between speaker and beloved. Harris also ponders the elegy's extension to the collective experience of loss. In each chapter, Harris explores a distinct psychoanalytic theory, discussing a new poet (or poets) and introducing a novel perspective each time. Her style of writing is clear and engaging, and the depth of her analysis and theoretical arguments is impressive. Throughout the volume, Harris manages a remarkable balance between explication and theory.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The introduction explores psychoanalytic theory from Freud to Lacan to Derrida and argues for understanding the elegy as a form that interrogates interiority and interconnection. She questions how the elegy can serve as a form of consolation for those who refuse it. For Harris, the elegy moves in three directions: the first allows the speaker to define themselves &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 297]&lt;/strong&gt; through the relationship with the deceased, the second permits the speaker to remain with the deceased through the power of words, and the third serves as a vehicle for the speaker's separation from the beloved via mourning. This tripartite paradox of the elegy as coalescence, container, and conduit animates the volume.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In chapters on Wordsworth and Keats, Harris explores the tension between coexistence, container, and conduit and shows that it is inherently religious. These elegies vacillate between the potential of transcendence in the present moment of a poem and the belief that the departed transitions to life in Heaven, leaving th","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141720941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding the Phenomenon of Negative Myths 了解消极神话现象
IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1353/aim.2024.a932380
Agnes Szajcz

Abstract:

This article delves into the exploration of negative myths, examining their prevalence in both ancient and modern times. I focus on the psychoanalytic understanding of collective and group narratives, particularly within the context of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. Drawing from Levine's two-track model of psychoanalysis, this study investigates how negative myths function as containers for processing unrepresented unconscious content. Through case vignettes, the characteristics of negative myths are illuminated, revealing them as distorted and dysfunctional containers of psychic material. I argue that negative myths emerge in response to dread and fear, serving as reflections of societal anxieties.

摘要:本文深入探讨了负面神话,研究了它们在古代和现代的流行情况。我将重点放在精神分析对集体和群体叙事的理解上,尤其是在心理治疗和精神分析的背景下。本研究借鉴了莱文的精神分析双轨模型,探讨了负面神话是如何作为容器来处理未被表述的无意识内容的。通过案例分析,揭示了消极神话的特征,揭示了消极神话作为心理材料的扭曲和功能失调的容器。我认为,负面神话的出现是对恐惧和害怕的回应,是社会焦虑的反映。
{"title":"Understanding the Phenomenon of Negative Myths","authors":"Agnes Szajcz","doi":"10.1353/aim.2024.a932380","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a932380","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This article delves into the exploration of negative myths, examining their prevalence in both ancient and modern times. I focus on the psychoanalytic understanding of collective and group narratives, particularly within the context of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. Drawing from Levine's two-track model of psychoanalysis, this study investigates how negative myths function as containers for processing unrepresented unconscious content. Through case vignettes, the characteristics of negative myths are illuminated, revealing them as distorted and dysfunctional containers of psychic material. I argue that negative myths emerge in response to dread and fear, serving as reflections of societal anxieties.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141720911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychoanalysis and Poetry: A Dialogue about Emily Dickinson's "'Hope' is the thing with feathers" 精神分析与诗歌:关于艾米莉-狄金森"'希望'是有羽毛的东西 "的对话
IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1353/aim.2024.a932381
Dawn Skorczewski, Andrea Celenza
<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span><p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Psychoanalysis and Poetry:<span>A Dialogue about Emily Dickinson's "'Hope' is the thing with feathers"</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Dawn Skorczewski (bio) and Andrea Celenza (bio) </li> </ul> <p>"Hope" is the thing with feathers – (314)</p> <blockquote> <p><span>"Hope" is the thing with feathers -</span><span>That perches in the soul -</span><span>And sings the tune without the words -</span><span>And never stops – at all -</span></p> <p><span>And sweetest – in the Gale - is heard -</span><span>And sore must be the storm -</span><span>That could abash the little Bird</span><span>That kept so many warm -</span></p> <p><span>I've heard it in the chillest land -</span><span>And on the strangest Sea -</span><span>Yet - never - in Extremity,</span><span>It asked a crumb - of me.</span></p> </blockquote> <em>Celenza</em>: <p>Is this my favorite poem? What a thing for me to say … like Freud's papers—there are so many! And yet, I can say at this moment (and many moments in the past), this is my favorite poem. Reading it today, though, I take special notice of the sensory images that Dickinson evokes—like contemporary writing in psychoanalysis, there is a poignant noting of the body, the way emotions emerge, make themselves felt, in the tingling of fingertips and queasiness in our stomachs … "the thing with feathers" obliquely rendering the trite 'butterflies' we all know and dread. <strong>[End Page 275]</strong></p> <em>Skorczewski</em>: <p>When you chose this poem, I immediately started to think about the fact that the words "hope" and "thing" and "feathers" all appear in the first line, which is a sentence, a declaration. She mixes a feeling, an unnamed object and the part of a bird that helps to keep them warm. How can hope be a thing? How can a thing have feathers? Then she places it in the soul, singing a tune without its words, endlessly. So by the end of stanza one we have a position. We are listening to a soul's song. Suddenly I had a memory of my analyst saying to me, on a day when I felt so depressed, "I am holding on to the hope." It was very important to me that she felt there could be another life for me.</p> <em>Celenza</em>: <p>Isn't what your analyst said at the heart of it all? To hold the hope when our patients cannot access it. We see beyond the immediate and can envision a future, a psychic future, that our patients cannot (or dare not) imagine. As if we know what that might be—but we don't know the specifics, yet we dare to trust that something will emerge—without words, without asking, we trust that some shape will form and arise from within the soul. I love the way you said, "We have a position. We are listening to a soul's song."</p> <p>The poets have said it all! We are mere tradespersons trying to put their insights into practice. Poetry does the thing it writes about, providing an experience of di
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 精神分析与诗歌:关于艾米莉-狄金森"'希望'是有羽毛的东西 "的对话 道恩-斯科尔切夫斯基(Dawn Skorczewski)(简历)和安德烈娅-塞伦扎(Andrea Celenza)(简历) "希望 "是有羽毛的东西--(314) "希望 "是有羽毛的东西--栖息在灵魂深处--唱着无言的曲调--永不停歇--在大风中--听到最甜美的声音--在大风中--听到最甜美的声音--在大风中--听到最甜美的声音。我在最寒冷的土地上听到过它的歌声 在最奇异的海洋上听到过它的歌声 但从未在极端的环境中听到过、它从未向我要过面包屑 塞伦扎这是我最喜欢的诗吗?我真不知道该怎么说......就像弗洛伊德的论文一样,有太多了!然而,此时此刻(以及过去的许多时刻),我可以说,这是我最喜欢的一首诗。今天读这首诗,我特别注意到狄金森所唤起的感官意象,就像当代精神分析的写作一样,这首诗凄美地记录了身体,记录了情绪出现的方式,让我们感受到指尖的刺痛和胃里的恶心...... "有羽毛的东西 "间接地渲染了我们都知道和害怕的老套的 "蝴蝶"。[尾页 275] Skorczewski:当你选择这首诗时,我立即开始思考,"希望"、"东西 "和 "羽毛 "都出现在第一行,这是一个句子,一个宣言。她把一种感觉、一个不知名的物体和鸟身上帮助它们取暖的部分混合在一起。希望怎么会是一种东西?一个东西怎么会有羽毛?然后,她将其置于灵魂之中,无休止地唱着一首没有歌词的曲调。因此,在第一节的结尾,我们有了一个定位。我们在聆听灵魂之歌。突然间,我想起了我的分析师在我感到沮丧的那天对我说:"我在坚持希望。"这对我来说非常重要,因为她觉得我可能会有另一种生活。Celenza:你的分析师所说的不正是这一切的核心吗?当我们的病人无法获得希望时,我们要抓住希望。我们能看到眼前之外的东西,并能设想出病人无法(或不敢)想象的未来,心理上的未来。仿佛我们知道那可能是什么--但我们不知道具体细节,但我们敢于相信某些东西会出现--无需言语,无需询问,我们相信某些形状会从灵魂深处形成并出现。我喜欢你说:"我们有自己的立场。我们在聆听灵魂之歌"。诗人已经说得很清楚了!我们只是试图将他们的见解付诸实践的行者。诗歌就像它所写的那样,在描述它所孕育的事物的同时,为可能出现的事物提供一种探索体验。文字的非线性表演性质,叙述的戏剧性。我也很喜欢(既然你这么说了!)狄肯森在第一行就把希望、事物和羽毛都写了出来--她描绘了一只鸟,但没有明确地说出它的名字。仿佛那只鸟就栖息在我们身边,(也许是沙发后面的分析师?)耐心地等待着我们,只要我们敢于去看,就能发现。冲上海岸,就像林白的海上礼物。这就是希望的体验--只要我们敢于去看、去感受、去发现。斯科尔切夫斯基:我对你的无限热情产生了共鸣,你还强调了 "我们",包括栖息在我们身边的鸟儿。当她说它栖息在 "灵魂深处 "时,我觉得她是在暗示,一个人的内心可能就是希望所在。我希望我不必把恐惧和羞耻也寄托在那里的想法置之不理。然后它开始歌唱。抒情诗?诗歌变成了灵魂本身,而我们正与她的灵魂相聚?这就是我的想法。但是...
{"title":"Psychoanalysis and Poetry: A Dialogue about Emily Dickinson's \"'Hope' is the thing with feathers\"","authors":"Dawn Skorczewski, Andrea Celenza","doi":"10.1353/aim.2024.a932381","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a932381","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In lieu of&lt;/span&gt; an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:&lt;/span&gt;\u0000&lt;p&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;!-- html_title --&gt; Psychoanalysis and Poetry:&lt;span&gt;A Dialogue about Emily Dickinson's \"'Hope' is the thing with feathers\"&lt;/span&gt; &lt;!-- /html_title --&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt; Dawn Skorczewski (bio) and Andrea Celenza (bio) &lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; &lt;p&gt;\"Hope\" is the thing with feathers – (314)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;\"Hope\" is the thing with feathers -&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;That perches in the soul -&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;And sings the tune without the words -&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;And never stops – at all -&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;And sweetest – in the Gale - is heard -&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;And sore must be the storm -&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;That could abash the little Bird&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;That kept so many warm -&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;I've heard it in the chillest land -&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;And on the strangest Sea -&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Yet - never - in Extremity,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;It asked a crumb - of me.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;em&gt;Celenza&lt;/em&gt;: &lt;p&gt;Is this my favorite poem? What a thing for me to say … like Freud's papers—there are so many! And yet, I can say at this moment (and many moments in the past), this is my favorite poem. Reading it today, though, I take special notice of the sensory images that Dickinson evokes—like contemporary writing in psychoanalysis, there is a poignant noting of the body, the way emotions emerge, make themselves felt, in the tingling of fingertips and queasiness in our stomachs … \"the thing with feathers\" obliquely rendering the trite 'butterflies' we all know and dread. &lt;strong&gt;[End Page 275]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;em&gt;Skorczewski&lt;/em&gt;: &lt;p&gt;When you chose this poem, I immediately started to think about the fact that the words \"hope\" and \"thing\" and \"feathers\" all appear in the first line, which is a sentence, a declaration. She mixes a feeling, an unnamed object and the part of a bird that helps to keep them warm. How can hope be a thing? How can a thing have feathers? Then she places it in the soul, singing a tune without its words, endlessly. So by the end of stanza one we have a position. We are listening to a soul's song. Suddenly I had a memory of my analyst saying to me, on a day when I felt so depressed, \"I am holding on to the hope.\" It was very important to me that she felt there could be another life for me.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;em&gt;Celenza&lt;/em&gt;: &lt;p&gt;Isn't what your analyst said at the heart of it all? To hold the hope when our patients cannot access it. We see beyond the immediate and can envision a future, a psychic future, that our patients cannot (or dare not) imagine. As if we know what that might be—but we don't know the specifics, yet we dare to trust that something will emerge—without words, without asking, we trust that some shape will form and arise from within the soul. I love the way you said, \"We have a position. We are listening to a soul's song.\"&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The poets have said it all! We are mere tradespersons trying to put their insights into practice. Poetry does the thing it writes about, providing an experience of di","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141720940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nabokov and Freud: Solus Rex vs Oedipus Rex 纳博科夫与弗洛伊德索罗斯与俄狄浦斯王
IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1353/aim.2024.a932378
Igor Kolmakov

Abstract:

The enigma of Nabokov's lifelong enmity with Freud perpetually attracts research attention. In this article, the author analyzes the Russian-American writer Vladimir Nabokov's demonization of Freud by surveying previous explanations of this phenomenon and proposing an alternative explanation of Nabokov perceiving Freud not as a "father figure" or a "precursor," but as a dangerous and influential rival within the field of psychology as opposed to literature. The author asserts that Nabokov's feud with Freud is centered on the question of the soul. In particular, Nabokov strives to position himself within the realm of "soul interpretation" or "soul fiction" as a "subject supposed to know" and to establish himself as a superior hermeneutical authority. Finally, the author draws a parallel between Nabokov's attitude to Freud and Freud's approach to Nietzsche.

摘要:纳博科夫与弗洛伊德的终生恩怨之谜一直吸引着研究者的目光。在这篇文章中,作者分析了俄裔美国作家弗拉基米尔-纳博科夫对弗洛伊德的妖魔化,考察了以往对这一现象的解释,并提出了另一种解释,即纳博科夫不是把弗洛伊德视为 "父亲的形象 "或 "先驱",而是将其视为心理学领域中一个危险而有影响力的对手,而不是文学领域中的对手。作者认为,纳博科夫与弗洛伊德的恩怨主要集中在灵魂问题上。特别是,纳博科夫力图将自己定位在 "灵魂阐释 "或 "灵魂小说 "的领域,成为 "应该知道的主体",并将自己树立为高高在上的阐释学权威。最后,作者将纳博科夫对弗洛伊德的态度与弗洛伊德对尼采的态度相提并论。
{"title":"Nabokov and Freud: Solus Rex vs Oedipus Rex","authors":"Igor Kolmakov","doi":"10.1353/aim.2024.a932378","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a932378","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>The enigma of Nabokov's lifelong enmity with Freud perpetually attracts research attention. In this article, the author analyzes the Russian-American writer Vladimir Nabokov's demonization of Freud by surveying previous explanations of this phenomenon and proposing an alternative explanation of Nabokov perceiving Freud not as a \"father figure\" or a \"precursor,\" but as a dangerous and influential rival within the field of psychology as opposed to literature. The author asserts that Nabokov's feud with Freud is centered on the question of the soul. In particular, Nabokov strives to position himself within the realm of \"soul interpretation\" or \"soul fiction\" as a \"subject supposed to know\" and to establish himself as a superior hermeneutical authority. Finally, the author draws a parallel between Nabokov's attitude to Freud and Freud's approach to Nietzsche.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141720910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Freud's Aphasia Book and Spielrein's Destruction Paper: A Shared Fate, To Be Ignored and Restored 弗洛伊德的《失语书》和斯皮尔林的《毁灭论文》:被忽视和被修复的共同命运
IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI: 10.1353/aim.2024.a923506
Frank Marchese

Abstract:

This article discusses the early fate and subsequent revival of interest in Freud’s 1891 book, On Aphasia, and Sabina Spielrein’s 1912 Destruction paper. Early on, these authors shared a similar fate: a failure of recognition of the aforementioned works at the time of their initial publication. In Freud’s case, the number of books sold was minimal and the rest were shredded; it remained mostly unread and overlooked in discussions of neurological problems, although regarded as a classical contribution to the field of neurology. As for Spielrein, her paper, following its initial appearance in German, was not published until 80 years later in English! Although Spielrein had a profound impact throughout her mature career as a psychiatrist, psychoanalyst, and developmental child psychologist, she remained unacknowledged during her lifetime and was virtually forgotten after her death. This article demonstrates that, although the importance of their seminal works was overlooked, recent developments in neuroscience have revived interest in On Aphasia and, in Spielrein’s case, her contributions to psychoanalysis and developmental psychology have become classics in these fields.

摘要:本文讨论了弗洛伊德 1891 年出版的《论失语症》一书和萨比娜-斯皮尔林 1912 年发表的《毁灭》一文的早期命运以及后来重新引起的关注。早期,这两位作者有着相似的命运:上述作品在最初出版时没有得到认可。就弗洛伊德而言,他的著作只售出了极少量,其余的都被撕毁了;尽管被视为对神经学领域的经典贡献,但在神经学问题的讨论中,它仍然大多未被阅读和忽视。至于斯皮尔林,她的论文最初以德文发表,直到 80 年后才以英文出版!虽然斯皮尔林作为一名精神病学家、精神分析师和儿童发展心理学家,在其成熟的职业生涯中产生了深远的影响,但她生前一直不为人知,死后几乎被人遗忘。这篇文章表明,虽然他们的开创性著作的重要性被忽视了,但最近神经科学的发展重新唤起了人们对《论失语症》的兴趣,而就斯皮尔林而言,她对精神分析和发展心理学的贡献已成为这些领域的经典。
{"title":"Freud's Aphasia Book and Spielrein's Destruction Paper: A Shared Fate, To Be Ignored and Restored","authors":"Frank Marchese","doi":"10.1353/aim.2024.a923506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a923506","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This article discusses the early fate and subsequent revival of interest in Freud’s 1891 book, <i>On Aphasia</i>, and Sabina Spielrein’s 1912 <i>Destruction</i> paper. Early on, these authors shared a similar fate: a failure of recognition of the aforementioned works at the time of their initial publication. In Freud’s case, the number of books sold was minimal and the rest were shredded; it remained mostly unread and overlooked in discussions of neurological problems, although regarded as a classical contribution to the field of neurology. As for Spielrein, her paper, following its initial appearance in German, was not published until 80 years later in English! Although Spielrein had a profound impact throughout her mature career as a psychiatrist, psychoanalyst, and developmental child psychologist, she remained unacknowledged during her lifetime and was virtually forgotten after her death. This article demonstrates that, although the importance of their seminal works was overlooked, recent developments in neuroscience have revived interest in <i>On Aphasia</i> and, in Spielrein’s case, her contributions to psychoanalysis and developmental psychology have become classics in these fields.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140323461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Men Under the Microscope: The Gaze of Other Men, "The Subject Who Is Supposed to Know," and the Pursuit of Wholeness 显微镜下的男人其他男人的凝视、"应该知道的对象 "和对完整的追求
IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI: 10.1353/aim.2024.a923507
Elizabeth McManaman Tyler

Abstract:

While numerous Men and Masculinities scholars discuss how men “perform” or seek to “prove” their masculinity to other men, a psychoanalytic investigation into the structural relations of this dynamic—especially with regard to young American high school- and college-age men—is needed. Using Peggy Orenstein’s Boys and Sex: Young Men on Hookups, Love, Porn, Consent, and Navigating the New Masculinity (2020) as a source text, I draw on the Lacanian concept of “the subject who is supposed to know” to elucidate the homosocial nature of masculinity. A Lacanian reading of Boys and Sex suggests that American high school and college men’s desires are incited by the ostensible enjoyment, or jouissance, they witness other men experiencing when engaging in “masculine” behaviors. Orenstein’s adolescent and young-adult interviewees demonstrate how “what one wants” is inextricably bound with what one sees (or interprets) other men wanting. While Men and Masculinities scholars argue that performances of masculinity are enacted to avoid ostracism and humiliation, a Lacanian account centers on the psychic pursuit of (illusory) wholeness. Lastly, Lacan’s notion of “traversing the fantasy” offers a path toward reclaiming agency despite the sway of cultural ideals and the gaze of Others.

摘要:尽管许多《男性与男性气质》(Men and Masculinities)学者都在讨论男性如何 "表演 "或试图向其他男性 "证明 "自己的男性气质,但对这种动态的结构性关系--尤其是针对美国高中和大学的年轻男性--的精神分析研究仍有必要。利用佩吉-奥伦斯坦(Peggy Orenstein)的《男孩与性》(Boys and Sex:Young Men on Hookups, Love, Porn, Consent, and Navigating the New Masculinity (2020)》一书作为素材,我借鉴了拉康式的 "应该知道的主体 "概念,来阐释男性气质的同质性。对《男孩与性》的拉康式解读表明,美国高中和大学男性的欲望是被他们目睹其他男性在从事 "男性 "行为时所体验到的表面上的享受或 "愉悦"(jouissance)所激发的。奥伦斯坦的青少年受访者表明,"自己想要什么 "与看到(或理解)其他男性想要什么有着千丝万缕的联系。男性与男性气质》(Men and Masculinities)一书的学者们认为,男性气质的表现是为了避免被排斥和羞辱,而拉康的观点则以追求(虚幻的)整体性的心理为中心。最后,拉康的 "穿越幻想 "概念为我们提供了一条在文化理想和他人注视的影响下重新获得代理权的道路。
{"title":"Men Under the Microscope: The Gaze of Other Men, \"The Subject Who Is Supposed to Know,\" and the Pursuit of Wholeness","authors":"Elizabeth McManaman Tyler","doi":"10.1353/aim.2024.a923507","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a923507","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>While numerous Men and Masculinities scholars discuss how men “perform” or seek to “prove” their masculinity to other men, a psychoanalytic investigation into the structural relations of this dynamic—especially with regard to young American high school- and college-age men—is needed. Using Peggy Orenstein’s <i>Boys and Sex: Young Men on Hookups, Love, Porn, Consent, and Navigating the New Masculinity</i> (2020) as a source text, I draw on the Lacanian concept of “the subject who is supposed to know” to elucidate the homosocial nature of masculinity. A Lacanian reading of <i>Boys and Sex</i> suggests that American high school and college men’s desires are incited by the ostensible enjoyment, or jouissance, they witness other men experiencing when engaging in “masculine” behaviors. Orenstein’s adolescent and young-adult interviewees demonstrate how “what one wants” is inextricably bound with what one sees (or interprets) other men wanting. While Men and Masculinities scholars argue that performances of masculinity are enacted to avoid ostracism and humiliation, a Lacanian account centers on the psychic pursuit of (illusory) wholeness. Lastly, Lacan’s notion of “traversing the fantasy” offers a path toward reclaiming agency despite the sway of cultural ideals and the gaze of Others.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140323289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
AMERICAN IMAGO
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1