Publicly shared domestic-related amenities: Pockets of privacy enhancing public space

Q1 Arts and Humanities Spatium Pub Date : 2020-08-09 DOI:10.2298/spat2043008k
Ls Kimmel, C. Tietz
{"title":"Publicly shared domestic-related amenities: Pockets of privacy enhancing public space","authors":"Ls Kimmel, C. Tietz","doi":"10.2298/spat2043008k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses amenities that are shared by anyone in public space,\n such as public barbecues in Australia. The idea is generalized to a range of\n domestic-related amenities, from kitchen-related to bathroom-related, etc.\n As these domestic-related amenities relate to usage that is typically\n conducted within a dwelling, the amenity and its architecture can be\n considered a ?pocket of privacy? in public space (Pocket). Our discussion\n explores how these publicly shared domestic-related amenities can address\n particular needs of society in the context of their economic, symbolic,\n aesthetic and ethical value. Specifically, we suggest that Pockets\n productively address the politics of public space and private place in three\n key ways: through the negotiation of the presence of people in public space,\n through the negotiation of individual and collective usage of the amenity,\n and through the gap between the symbolic and economic power created by the\n usage of these amenities. We conclude by proposing planning principles that\n may enable the economic, symbolic, aesthetic and ethical value of these\n amenities to be fully realized in ways that balance the politics of public\n space and private place.","PeriodicalId":38713,"journal":{"name":"Spatium","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/spat2043008k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article discusses amenities that are shared by anyone in public space, such as public barbecues in Australia. The idea is generalized to a range of domestic-related amenities, from kitchen-related to bathroom-related, etc. As these domestic-related amenities relate to usage that is typically conducted within a dwelling, the amenity and its architecture can be considered a ?pocket of privacy? in public space (Pocket). Our discussion explores how these publicly shared domestic-related amenities can address particular needs of society in the context of their economic, symbolic, aesthetic and ethical value. Specifically, we suggest that Pockets productively address the politics of public space and private place in three key ways: through the negotiation of the presence of people in public space, through the negotiation of individual and collective usage of the amenity, and through the gap between the symbolic and economic power created by the usage of these amenities. We conclude by proposing planning principles that may enable the economic, symbolic, aesthetic and ethical value of these amenities to be fully realized in ways that balance the politics of public space and private place.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共共享的家庭相关设施:增强公共空间隐私的口袋
这篇文章讨论了公共空间中任何人都可以共享的设施,比如澳大利亚的公共烧烤。这个想法被推广到一系列与家庭相关的设施,从厨房到浴室等。由于这些与家庭相关的设施通常与住宅内的使用有关,因此这些设施及其建筑可以被视为“隐私口袋”。在公共空间(口袋)。我们的讨论探讨了这些公共共享的家庭相关设施如何在其经济、象征、美学和伦理价值的背景下满足社会的特殊需求。具体来说,我们建议“口袋”以三种关键方式有效地解决公共空间和私人场所的政治问题:通过公共空间中人们存在的谈判,通过个人和集体使用便利设施的谈判,以及通过使用这些便利设施所产生的象征性和经济力量之间的差距。最后,我们提出了一些规划原则,这些原则可以使这些设施的经济、象征、美学和道德价值以平衡公共空间和私人空间的方式得到充分实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spatium
Spatium Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The first community housing model constructed in Hungary - the collective house in Miskolc Credibility of legalization: Illegally constructed buildings in Serbia Rethinking soviet era mass housing in Kazakhstan Are we discriminating towards guests with disabilities? Accessibility analyses of public restaurants facilities in the Republic of Slovenia The impact of energy improvement measures in single-family residential buildings on air pollution in the city of Uzice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1