Burnout in emergency medical technicians and paramedics in the USA

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Emergency Services Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI:10.1108/ijes-03-2020-0012
Celia Sporer
{"title":"Burnout in emergency medical technicians and paramedics in the USA","authors":"Celia Sporer","doi":"10.1108/ijes-03-2020-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study was designed to examine burnout in US emergency medical services (EMS) providers. It examined burnout scores measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) on a convince sample of US EMS providers as well individual variables associated of burnout in this population.Design/methodology/approachThis study used a convince sample, recruited using social media, of EMTs and paramedics and engaged them in an online survey to obtain information on burnout in this population. The responses were analyzed using stand statistical approached in order to determine MBI burnout scores, as well as which individual variables were influential in contributing to burnout in EMS.FindingsThis study found that most EMS providers had high levels of depersonalization and medium levels of personal accomplishment and emotional exhaustion. Gender differences were found as they were differences based on agency type and response area.Research limitations/implicationsThe main limitation is the nature of sample recruitment. The use of social media for the recruitment of this type of study has not been done before. Furthermore, it is a convince sample. This issue has limited impact on the results and the ability to apply them more generally because despite the convince nature of this sample, the sample is similar to those used in other studies as well as reflect that national statistics on the make of this population. The second major limitation of this study is that it does not include job specific and organization specific factors that may contribute to burnout. The findings for the variables used in this study suggest that future works should encompass these variables as well.Practical implicationsThis study sets a clear foundation for further examination of US EMS providers and burnout. It helps to establish key ideas that can be followed up. Difference and key issues among US EMS providers need to be understood on a more comprehensive level before the assertion that they are similar to EMS providers worldwide. Ultimately, there is a need to develop better screening tools to assess burnout in EMS as well as to develop prevention and intervention programs based on clear empirical data.Social implicationsBurnout EMS provides are a harm to themselves as well as the organization that employ them. The cost of burnout EMS provider crosses over to patient care and provision of care.Originality/valueThis study is one of the first to examine such a large US-based sample of EMS providers using the MBI. Other studies have used smaller sample or other tools to assess burnout in providers","PeriodicalId":44087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijes-03-2020-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThis study was designed to examine burnout in US emergency medical services (EMS) providers. It examined burnout scores measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) on a convince sample of US EMS providers as well individual variables associated of burnout in this population.Design/methodology/approachThis study used a convince sample, recruited using social media, of EMTs and paramedics and engaged them in an online survey to obtain information on burnout in this population. The responses were analyzed using stand statistical approached in order to determine MBI burnout scores, as well as which individual variables were influential in contributing to burnout in EMS.FindingsThis study found that most EMS providers had high levels of depersonalization and medium levels of personal accomplishment and emotional exhaustion. Gender differences were found as they were differences based on agency type and response area.Research limitations/implicationsThe main limitation is the nature of sample recruitment. The use of social media for the recruitment of this type of study has not been done before. Furthermore, it is a convince sample. This issue has limited impact on the results and the ability to apply them more generally because despite the convince nature of this sample, the sample is similar to those used in other studies as well as reflect that national statistics on the make of this population. The second major limitation of this study is that it does not include job specific and organization specific factors that may contribute to burnout. The findings for the variables used in this study suggest that future works should encompass these variables as well.Practical implicationsThis study sets a clear foundation for further examination of US EMS providers and burnout. It helps to establish key ideas that can be followed up. Difference and key issues among US EMS providers need to be understood on a more comprehensive level before the assertion that they are similar to EMS providers worldwide. Ultimately, there is a need to develop better screening tools to assess burnout in EMS as well as to develop prevention and intervention programs based on clear empirical data.Social implicationsBurnout EMS provides are a harm to themselves as well as the organization that employ them. The cost of burnout EMS provider crosses over to patient care and provision of care.Originality/valueThis study is one of the first to examine such a large US-based sample of EMS providers using the MBI. Other studies have used smaller sample or other tools to assess burnout in providers
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国紧急医疗技术人员和护理人员的职业倦怠
目的本研究旨在调查美国紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供者的职业倦怠。它检查了使用马斯拉克倦怠量表(MBI)在美国EMS供应商的一个可靠样本上测量的倦怠得分,以及与该人群中倦怠相关的个体变量。设计/方法/方法本研究使用了一个可信的样本,通过社交媒体招募了emt和护理人员,并让他们参与了一项在线调查,以获取这一人群的倦怠信息。为了确定MBI的倦怠得分,以及哪些个体变量对EMS中的倦怠有影响,我们使用stand统计学方法对这些反应进行了分析。本研究发现,大多数急救服务提供者人格解体程度高,个人成就感和情绪耗竭程度中等。性别差异是基于代理类型和响应领域的差异。研究的局限性/启示主要的局限性是样本招募的性质。利用社交媒体招募这种类型的研究之前还没有做过。此外,它是一个令人信服的样本。这个问题对结果和更普遍地应用结果的能力影响有限,因为尽管该样本具有令人信服的性质,但该样本与其他研究中使用的样本相似,并且反映了关于该人口构成的国家统计数据。本研究的第二个主要局限性是它没有包括可能导致职业倦怠的工作特定因素和组织特定因素。本研究中使用的变量的发现表明,未来的工作也应该包括这些变量。实际意义本研究为进一步研究美国EMS服务提供者与职业倦怠奠定了明确的基础。它有助于建立可以跟进的关键想法。在断言美国EMS提供商与世界各地的EMS提供商相似之前,需要更全面地了解美国EMS提供商之间的差异和关键问题。最终,需要开发更好的筛选工具来评估EMS中的倦怠,并根据明确的经验数据制定预防和干预方案。社会影响EMS提供的职业倦怠对他们自己和雇佣他们的组织都是一种伤害。医疗服务提供者的倦怠成本跨越到病人护理和提供护理。原创性/价值本研究是第一个使用MBI对如此大的美国EMS供应商样本进行调查的研究之一。其他研究使用较小的样本或其他工具来评估提供者的倦怠
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Emergency Services
International Journal of Emergency Services SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Australian paramedics following the introduction of professional regulation: a qualitative exploration Optimization of new fire department location using an improved GIS algorithm for firefighters travel time estimation The adoption of evidence-based policing: the pivotal role of first-line police leaders across England and Wales The impacts of leadership behaviours on the mental well-being of public safety communicators Towards disaster prevention in community centers: development of a code-based fire risk assessment tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1