Understanding the resistance to carbon taxes: Drivers and barriers among the general public and fuel-tax protesters

IF 3.1 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Resource and Energy Economics Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101331
Jens Ewald , Thomas Sterner , Erik Sterner
{"title":"Understanding the resistance to carbon taxes: Drivers and barriers among the general public and fuel-tax protesters","authors":"Jens Ewald ,&nbsp;Thomas Sterner ,&nbsp;Erik Sterner","doi":"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon taxes are generally well accepted in countries with significant experience thereof but there is still public resistance to raising them. We study attitudes toward carbon taxation and other environmental policy instruments in Sweden. We survey a national sample of the population as well as members of a large political movement that protests fuel taxes. Our results show that the motivations in both groups are alike: educational level, rural versus urban domicile, political orientation, and especially trust in government correlate with opinions on carbon taxes; household income does not appear to matter. Lack of trust in government and lack of belief in the Pigouvian mechanism appear as especially important motivations for protesters’ opposition. We find support for revenue refunding, but greater support, in both groups, for earmarking for climate use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47952,"journal":{"name":"Resource and Energy Economics","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101331"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765522000483/pdfft?md5=d71635cf5ec93847235e02394a9a91e0&pid=1-s2.0-S0928765522000483-main.pdf","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource and Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765522000483","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Carbon taxes are generally well accepted in countries with significant experience thereof but there is still public resistance to raising them. We study attitudes toward carbon taxation and other environmental policy instruments in Sweden. We survey a national sample of the population as well as members of a large political movement that protests fuel taxes. Our results show that the motivations in both groups are alike: educational level, rural versus urban domicile, political orientation, and especially trust in government correlate with opinions on carbon taxes; household income does not appear to matter. Lack of trust in government and lack of belief in the Pigouvian mechanism appear as especially important motivations for protesters’ opposition. We find support for revenue refunding, but greater support, in both groups, for earmarking for climate use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解对碳税的抵制:普通公众和燃油税抗议者之间的驱动因素和障碍
碳税在具有丰富经验的国家普遍被接受,但公众仍反对提高碳税。我们研究了瑞典对碳税和其他环境政策工具的态度。我们调查了全国人口样本以及抗议燃油税的大型政治运动的成员。我们的研究结果表明,两个群体的动机是相似的:教育水平、农村与城市住所、政治取向,尤其是对政府的信任与碳税的观点相关;家庭收入似乎并不重要。对政府缺乏信任和对庇古机制缺乏信仰似乎是抗议者反对的特别重要动机。我们发现对收入返还的支持,但在两个群体中,对专门用于气候用途的支持都更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Resource and Energy Economics provides a forum for high level economic analysis of utilization and development of the earth natural resources. The subject matter encompasses questions of optimal production and consumption affecting energy, minerals, land, air and water, and includes analysis of firm and industry behavior, environmental issues and public policies. Implications for both developed and developing countries are of concern. The journal publishes high quality papers for an international audience. Innovative energy, resource and environmental analyses, including theoretical models and empirical studies are appropriate for publication in Resource and Energy Economics.
期刊最新文献
Will global warming reduce future energy consumption and CO2 emissions by U.S. households? To tax or to regulate? Cultural worldviews and the efficacy of policy trials Prominent numbers in DCE cost vectors: A review and an application to wind energy Jumping beans: Implications of fat tails in international soybean and biofuels markets Stochastic deforestation and ecosystem collapse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1