Contorting transformations: Uneven impacts of the U.S.–Mexico automotive industrial complex

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q2 BUSINESS Competition & Change Pub Date : 2021-09-13 DOI:10.1177/10245294211045453
M. Crossa
{"title":"Contorting transformations: Uneven impacts of the U.S.–Mexico automotive industrial complex","authors":"M. Crossa","doi":"10.1177/10245294211045453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contrary to the triumphalist rhetoric that describes the automotive industry as a lever for both regional development in North America and industrial upgrading in Mexico, this article argues that the formation of the Mexico–U.S. automotive complex has instead been consolidated on the basis of longstanding processes of uneven regional development. To make this argument, the paper examines how global economic restructuring, trade policies, domestic economic development processes, transnational firm decision making and the maintenance of the geopolitical border have reproduced extreme wage differences between the United States and Mexico, resulting in the creation of a regional automotive sector that is both highly integrated and highly unequal. In this scenario, both nations are home to profoundly different industrial landscapes: the U.S. hosts the highest value-added links of the production chain, monopolizing processes of innovation and scientific and technological knowledge production, while in contrast, Mexico manufactures the most labour intense and lowest value-added links of the automotive production chain. From this perspective, the Mexican economy can be essentially understood as an export manufacturing platform which derives its ‘competitiveness’ from the aggressive industry maintenance of low wages.","PeriodicalId":46999,"journal":{"name":"Competition & Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition & Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294211045453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Contrary to the triumphalist rhetoric that describes the automotive industry as a lever for both regional development in North America and industrial upgrading in Mexico, this article argues that the formation of the Mexico–U.S. automotive complex has instead been consolidated on the basis of longstanding processes of uneven regional development. To make this argument, the paper examines how global economic restructuring, trade policies, domestic economic development processes, transnational firm decision making and the maintenance of the geopolitical border have reproduced extreme wage differences between the United States and Mexico, resulting in the creation of a regional automotive sector that is both highly integrated and highly unequal. In this scenario, both nations are home to profoundly different industrial landscapes: the U.S. hosts the highest value-added links of the production chain, monopolizing processes of innovation and scientific and technological knowledge production, while in contrast, Mexico manufactures the most labour intense and lowest value-added links of the automotive production chain. From this perspective, the Mexican economy can be essentially understood as an export manufacturing platform which derives its ‘competitiveness’ from the aggressive industry maintenance of low wages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扭曲的转变:美国-墨西哥汽车工业综合体的不平衡影响
与将汽车工业描述为北美区域发展和墨西哥产业升级的杠杆的必胜主义言论相反,本文认为,美墨贸易关系的形成将促进墨西哥和美国之间的贸易关系。相反,汽车产业综合体是在长期不平衡的区域发展过程的基础上得到巩固的。为了提出这一论点,本文研究了全球经济结构调整、贸易政策、国内经济发展进程、跨国公司决策和地缘政治边界的维护如何在美国和墨西哥之间再现了极端的工资差异,从而创造了一个高度一体化和高度不平等的区域汽车行业。在这种情况下,两国的工业格局截然不同:美国拥有生产链中附加值最高的环节,垄断了创新和科技知识生产的过程,而相比之下,墨西哥制造了汽车生产链中劳动强度最高、附加值最低的环节。从这个角度来看,墨西哥经济基本上可以被理解为一个出口制造业平台,其“竞争力”来自于激进的低工资行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Making “strategic autonomy” rhyme with “fiscal austerity?” Unresolved conflicts of (geo)economic ideas in EU infrastructure policy Erratum to “An international interface: Democratic planning in a global context” The regulator’s trilemma: On the limits of technocratic governance in digital markets The invisible leverage of the rich. Absentee debtors and their hedge funds Partial organization and economic coordination: The gradual re-organization of Finnish corporatism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1