Corporate governance and carbon emissions performance: empirical evidence from Australia

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Australasian Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/14486563.2021.1989066
Jibriel Elsayih, Rina Datt, Qingliang Tang
{"title":"Corporate governance and carbon emissions performance: empirical evidence from Australia","authors":"Jibriel Elsayih, Rina Datt, Qingliang Tang","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2021.1989066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There is a growing volume of literature on corporate governance and sustainability. Despite this, the relationship between corporate governance (CG) and carbon emissions performance (CEP) is an unresolved issue. This motivates us to examine the impact of CG on CEP, using a sample of all Australian firms that have participated in the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) questionnaire survey. This study employs fixed-effects modelling for an unbalanced panel of 425 firm-year observations from 2010–2018. We find that firms with higher board independence and the presence of an environmental committee show enhanced CEP. Further, frequency of board meetings and gender diversity lead to improved CEP. However, ownership concentration does not appear to improve CEP. Our article provides valuable insight for corporate directors and regulators to help them recognize the vital role that board meetings, board gender diversity, board independence, and the presence of an environmental committee play in driving the carbon performance of companies. They can also use these results to identify positive elements of CG that may deserve additional regulatory focus to achieve carbon policy objectives. This study contributes to the increasing literature on the association between CG and climate change and presents a new direction for related research on whether and how CEP is influenced by CG.","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"28 1","pages":"433 - 459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2021.1989066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a growing volume of literature on corporate governance and sustainability. Despite this, the relationship between corporate governance (CG) and carbon emissions performance (CEP) is an unresolved issue. This motivates us to examine the impact of CG on CEP, using a sample of all Australian firms that have participated in the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) questionnaire survey. This study employs fixed-effects modelling for an unbalanced panel of 425 firm-year observations from 2010–2018. We find that firms with higher board independence and the presence of an environmental committee show enhanced CEP. Further, frequency of board meetings and gender diversity lead to improved CEP. However, ownership concentration does not appear to improve CEP. Our article provides valuable insight for corporate directors and regulators to help them recognize the vital role that board meetings, board gender diversity, board independence, and the presence of an environmental committee play in driving the carbon performance of companies. They can also use these results to identify positive elements of CG that may deserve additional regulatory focus to achieve carbon policy objectives. This study contributes to the increasing literature on the association between CG and climate change and presents a new direction for related research on whether and how CEP is influenced by CG.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公司治理与碳排放绩效:来自澳大利亚的经验证据
关于公司治理和可持续性的文献越来越多。尽管如此,公司治理(CG)与碳排放绩效(CEP)之间的关系仍是一个未解决的问题。这促使我们研究CG对CEP的影响,使用所有参与碳披露项目(CDP)问卷调查的澳大利亚公司的样本。本研究对2010-2018年425个公司年观测数据的不平衡面板采用固定效应模型。我们发现,董事会独立性较高和环境委员会存在的公司表现出更高的CEP。此外,董事会会议的频率和性别多样性导致CEP得到改善。然而,股权集中度似乎并未改善CEP。我们的文章为公司董事和监管机构提供了有价值的见解,帮助他们认识到董事会会议、董事会性别多样性、董事会独立性和环境委员会的存在在推动公司碳绩效方面发挥的重要作用。他们还可以利用这些结果来确定CG的积极因素,这些因素可能值得额外的监管重点,以实现碳政策目标。本研究有助于增加气候变化与气候变化之间关联的文献,并为气候变化是否受气候变化影响以及如何受气候变化影响的相关研究提供了新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Bioanalytical tools in water quality assessment (2nd ed.) Bioanalytical tools in water quality assessment (2nd ed.) , by Beate Escher, Peta Neale, and Frederic Leusch, London, UK, IWA Publishing, 2021, 462 pp., £115 (paperback), ISBN: 9781789061970 Farm dam accounting for healthy and safe agricultural catchments A property rights schema for cultural flows in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia How environmental beliefs influence the acceptance of reallocating government budgets to improving coastal water quality: a hybrid choice model Activating electricity system demand response for commercial and industrial organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1