The Impact of ECB’s Unconventional Monetary Policy on the German Stock Market Volatility

Sabri Alipanah, G. Kiss
{"title":"The Impact of ECB’s Unconventional Monetary Policy on the German Stock Market Volatility","authors":"Sabri Alipanah, G. Kiss","doi":"10.2478/zireb-2022-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigated the reaction of German stock market volatility (Dax index) to the European Central Bank (ECB)’s unconventional monetary policy (UMP) announcements. The financial crisis of 2008 proved that the traditional monetary policy’s tool (the short -term interest rate) has lost its effectiveness to meet the new challenges. So, the key central banks, ECB included, had to implement the new, untested and nonstandard monetary policy which so called unconventional monetary policy. In this study, we used the ECB’s shadow policy rate approach to extract unconventional monetary policy. Also, We employed GJR GARCH (p,o,q) model to estimate the volatility in the German stock market. Then we calibrated both OLS (linear regression) and Markov-switching (probability-matrix of regime changes) models to examine the reaction of German stock returns volatility to UMP announcement by ECB for a period from January 2006 to December 2019. The results delivered by both models showed that the ECB’s UMP had a strong and negative effect on the volatility of the German stock market. Also, both models showed that the past German stock volatility has a significant and negative effect on the dependent variable, while the volatility of the German stock returns is a function of the global volatility estimated by the VIX index. Moreover, the results showed that the Markov-switching regression model provides a better illustration of the stock market volatility impact of UMP than the OLS model because it can represent the changes into the two different regimes named ordinary regime and quantitative easing (crisis) regime. Furthermore, under the Markov-switching regression model, we can see how the output gap and the inflation gap influence the volatility of the Dax index, while the results of the OLS regression model showed that there is no significant relationship between the output gap and the inflation gap with the German stock market volatility.","PeriodicalId":42298,"journal":{"name":"Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business","volume":"25 1","pages":"17 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2022-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the reaction of German stock market volatility (Dax index) to the European Central Bank (ECB)’s unconventional monetary policy (UMP) announcements. The financial crisis of 2008 proved that the traditional monetary policy’s tool (the short -term interest rate) has lost its effectiveness to meet the new challenges. So, the key central banks, ECB included, had to implement the new, untested and nonstandard monetary policy which so called unconventional monetary policy. In this study, we used the ECB’s shadow policy rate approach to extract unconventional monetary policy. Also, We employed GJR GARCH (p,o,q) model to estimate the volatility in the German stock market. Then we calibrated both OLS (linear regression) and Markov-switching (probability-matrix of regime changes) models to examine the reaction of German stock returns volatility to UMP announcement by ECB for a period from January 2006 to December 2019. The results delivered by both models showed that the ECB’s UMP had a strong and negative effect on the volatility of the German stock market. Also, both models showed that the past German stock volatility has a significant and negative effect on the dependent variable, while the volatility of the German stock returns is a function of the global volatility estimated by the VIX index. Moreover, the results showed that the Markov-switching regression model provides a better illustration of the stock market volatility impact of UMP than the OLS model because it can represent the changes into the two different regimes named ordinary regime and quantitative easing (crisis) regime. Furthermore, under the Markov-switching regression model, we can see how the output gap and the inflation gap influence the volatility of the Dax index, while the results of the OLS regression model showed that there is no significant relationship between the output gap and the inflation gap with the German stock market volatility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲央行非常规货币政策对德国股市波动的影响
摘要本研究调查了德国股市波动率(Dax指数)对欧洲央行(ECB)非常规货币政策(UMP)公告的反应。2008年的金融危机证明,传统的货币政策工具(短期利率)已经失去了应对新挑战的有效性。因此,包括欧洲央行在内的主要央行不得不实施新的、未经测试的、非标准的货币政策,即所谓的非常规货币政策。在这项研究中,我们使用了欧洲央行的影子政策利率方法来提取非常规货币政策。此外,我们还采用GJR-GARCH(p,o,q)模型来估计德国股市的波动性。然后,我们校准了OLS(线性回归)和Markov切换(制度变化概率矩阵)模型,以检验2006年1月至2019年12月期间德国股票回报率波动对欧洲央行UMP公告的反应。两个模型的结果都表明,欧洲央行的UMP对德国股市的波动性产生了强烈的负面影响。此外,这两个模型都表明,过去德国股票的波动性对因变量有显著的负面影响,而德国股票回报的波动性是VIX指数估计的全球波动性的函数。此外,结果表明,马尔可夫切换回归模型比OLS模型更好地说明了UMP对股市波动的影响,因为它可以代表普通制度和量化宽松(危机)制度这两种不同制度的变化。此外,在Markov切换回归模型下,我们可以看到产出缺口和通胀缺口如何影响Dax指数的波动,而OLS回归模型的结果表明,产出缺口和通货膨胀缺口与德国股市波动没有显著关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Theory of Boundedly Rational Planned Behavior: A New Model Nexus between Macro Economic Variables and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Inflows in India: Evidence from Time Series Analysis A Spillover Effect of Human Capital on Gross Capital Formation: A Quantile Regression Approach Predicting Financial Crises and Signal Indicators in G7 Countries A Comparative Assessment of the Urbanization – Fertility Nexus in Most Urbanized Countries of Sub-Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1