Quality healthcare services under National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana: perspectives from health policy implementers and beneficiaries

IF 1.2 4区 法学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI:10.1108/pap-08-2021-0047
Daniel Dramani Kipo-Sunyehzi
{"title":"Quality healthcare services under National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana: perspectives from health policy implementers and beneficiaries","authors":"Daniel Dramani Kipo-Sunyehzi","doi":"10.1108/pap-08-2021-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to examine the factors that affect the quality of healthcare services in the implementation of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) at the local level in Ghana from the perspectives of health policy implementers and beneficiaries in public-private organisations.Design/methodology/approachThis paper has adopted a mixed research method with both qualitative and quantitative data, with in-depth interviews, document analysis and focus groups discussions. A total of 107 participants took part in the interviews and the questionnaire survey.FindingsThe study found that these factors greatly affect the quality of healthcare services from the implementers’ perspectives — referrals, effectiveness in monitoring, timeliness, efficiency, reimbursement, compliance with standard guidelines of Ghana Health Service (GHS) and accreditation process. For the beneficiaries, three healthcare services factors are important, including medical consultations, diagnostic services and the supply of drugs and medicines. Some other factors are found to be the least prioritized healthcare services, namely the issuance of prescription forms, verification of identification (ID) cards and staff attitude. However, the study found that implementers and beneficiaries exhibited a mixed reaction (perspectives) on accessing some healthcare services. In some healthcare services where the implementers perceived that beneficiaries have more access to such services, the beneficiaries think otherwise, an irony in the perspectives of the two actors.Originality/valueThis paper adds to the extant literature on the perspectives of policy implementers and beneficiaries on factors that affect the quality of healthcare services in general and specifically on the implementation of NHIS in Ghana with the public-private dimension.","PeriodicalId":34601,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-08-2021-0047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to examine the factors that affect the quality of healthcare services in the implementation of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) at the local level in Ghana from the perspectives of health policy implementers and beneficiaries in public-private organisations.Design/methodology/approachThis paper has adopted a mixed research method with both qualitative and quantitative data, with in-depth interviews, document analysis and focus groups discussions. A total of 107 participants took part in the interviews and the questionnaire survey.FindingsThe study found that these factors greatly affect the quality of healthcare services from the implementers’ perspectives — referrals, effectiveness in monitoring, timeliness, efficiency, reimbursement, compliance with standard guidelines of Ghana Health Service (GHS) and accreditation process. For the beneficiaries, three healthcare services factors are important, including medical consultations, diagnostic services and the supply of drugs and medicines. Some other factors are found to be the least prioritized healthcare services, namely the issuance of prescription forms, verification of identification (ID) cards and staff attitude. However, the study found that implementers and beneficiaries exhibited a mixed reaction (perspectives) on accessing some healthcare services. In some healthcare services where the implementers perceived that beneficiaries have more access to such services, the beneficiaries think otherwise, an irony in the perspectives of the two actors.Originality/valueThis paper adds to the extant literature on the perspectives of policy implementers and beneficiaries on factors that affect the quality of healthcare services in general and specifically on the implementation of NHIS in Ghana with the public-private dimension.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳国家健康保险计划下的优质保健服务:卫生政策执行者和受益者的观点
目的本文旨在从公共和私营组织的卫生政策实施者和受益人的角度,研究加纳地方一级实施国家健康保险计划(NHIS)过程中影响医疗服务质量的因素。设计/方法论/方法本文采用了定性和定量数据相结合的混合研究方法,包括深入访谈、文献分析和焦点小组讨论。共有107名参与者参加了访谈和问卷调查。研究发现,从实施者的角度来看,这些因素极大地影响了医疗服务的质量——转诊、监测的有效性、及时性、效率、报销、遵守加纳卫生服务(GHS)标准指南和认证流程。对受益人来说,三个医疗服务因素很重要,包括医疗咨询、诊断服务以及药品供应。其他一些因素被发现是最不优先的医疗服务,即处方表的发放、身份证的验证和工作人员的态度。然而,研究发现,实施者和受益人在获得一些医疗服务方面表现出混合反应(观点)。在一些医疗服务中,实施者认为受益人有更多机会获得此类服务,而受益人却不以为然,这在两个参与者的角度来看是一种讽刺。独创性/价值本文补充了现有文献中关于政策实施者和受益人对影响医疗服务质量的因素的看法,特别是关于加纳国家健康信息系统的公私层面的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A stakeholder analysis for sustainable development of Maritime Village in Semarang coastal community, Indonesia Indigenous cultures and employee efficiency: the moderating effect of cronyism in state-owned enterprises in Ghana Agencification, policy reversal and the reforms of the French health care system Critical success factors of Public-Private Partnerships in the education sector Citizens’ trust and digital attitudes: evidence from city digital transformation in Shanghai, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1