Information search, behavioural economics, and relevance decisions in the online media industry: how strongly do the algorithms of intermediaries influence the relevance evaluation of information?

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS Journal of Media Business Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-20 DOI:10.1080/16522354.2020.1854602
Hardy Gundlach, U. Hofmann
{"title":"Information search, behavioural economics, and relevance decisions in the online media industry: how strongly do the algorithms of intermediaries influence the relevance evaluation of information?","authors":"Hardy Gundlach, U. Hofmann","doi":"10.1080/16522354.2020.1854602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study compares several information services offered by Internet intermediaries. The hypotheses deal with the influence of a gatekeeper’s relevance assessment service on a consumer’s decision-making. The empirical findings provide a taxonomy of decisive attribute levels and their part-worth utilities which affect consumers’ decisions. From this, media management recommendations can be derived. Some findings may be worrying for media management. For example, search engines will increase the competitive pressure on journalistic media the better they provide personalised search results. However, the results also indicate that users’ search behaviours open up a large field for media companies’ brand-driven distribution strategies. This is possible because almost half of search engines’ search queries are by brand name or media label. The weakness of media companies is revealed above all in the field of advertising. Nonetheless, media companies are still highly competitive due to their journalistic potential. In view of the research results, media industries should modify their business models in such a way that they integrate more of the superior characteristics, compared with the algorithms of well-known Internet intermediaries, into their editorial journalistic work.","PeriodicalId":45673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Business Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16522354.2020.1854602","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2020.1854602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study compares several information services offered by Internet intermediaries. The hypotheses deal with the influence of a gatekeeper’s relevance assessment service on a consumer’s decision-making. The empirical findings provide a taxonomy of decisive attribute levels and their part-worth utilities which affect consumers’ decisions. From this, media management recommendations can be derived. Some findings may be worrying for media management. For example, search engines will increase the competitive pressure on journalistic media the better they provide personalised search results. However, the results also indicate that users’ search behaviours open up a large field for media companies’ brand-driven distribution strategies. This is possible because almost half of search engines’ search queries are by brand name or media label. The weakness of media companies is revealed above all in the field of advertising. Nonetheless, media companies are still highly competitive due to their journalistic potential. In view of the research results, media industries should modify their business models in such a way that they integrate more of the superior characteristics, compared with the algorithms of well-known Internet intermediaries, into their editorial journalistic work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络媒体行业的信息搜索、行为经济学和相关性决策:中介机构的算法对信息相关性评估的影响有多强?
摘要本研究比较了互联网中介机构提供的几种信息服务。假设涉及看门人的相关性评估服务对消费者决策的影响。实证研究结果提供了影响消费者决策的决定性属性水平及其部分价值效用的分类。由此可以得出媒体管理的建议。一些研究结果可能会让媒体管理部门感到担忧。例如,搜索引擎提供更好的个性化搜索结果将增加新闻媒体的竞争压力。然而,研究结果也表明,用户的搜索行为为媒体公司的品牌驱动分销策略开辟了广阔的领域。这是可能的,因为几乎一半的搜索引擎的搜索查询是通过品牌名称或媒体标签。媒体公司的弱点首先体现在广告领域。尽管如此,由于媒体公司的新闻潜力,它们仍然具有很强的竞争力。根据研究结果,媒体行业应该修改其商业模式,将更多与知名互联网中介的算法相比的优势特征融入其编辑新闻工作中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Innovation in the esports servicescape: a media business research agenda AI in the newsroom: a collective case study about newsworker-AI collaboration in the German newspaper industry Managing the narratives in narrative media brands The owner-market fit and responses to competing logics Obsolescence as a pattern: an analysis of how public service media managers perceive and cope with resistance to change in the platformisation era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1