The Specter of a “Revolutionary Situation”

Iu. V. Latov
{"title":"The Specter of a “Revolutionary Situation”","authors":"Iu. V. Latov","doi":"10.1080/10610154.2018.1547582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on material from nationwide surveys conducted by the RAS Institute of Sociology in monitor mode, this article explores the probability that a “revolutionary situation”—an increase in mass protest actions by the “lower classes”—will take shape in present-day Russia. An analysis of the results of a survey conducted in the early spring of 2016 and a comparison of it with previous “waves” of surveys show that in the near term (the next year or two) a “revolutionary situation” will remain only a dangerous specter for Russia—mass protest actions will be merely a potential threat, not a living reality. This is based on the fact that in 2015 there was a moderate level of personal participation in various protest actions. In addition, protest actions today are primarily of an economic nature: People protest mostly against layoffs, price rises, and so on, rather than against the government. A paradox is evident: Many protest against the existing socioeconomic “rules of the game,” but their protest has not been consolidated; the protest against existing political institutions has “leaders” (the liberal opposition), but that protest is much less massive. At the same time, one should take note of a dangerous phenomenon regarding the high volatility of the characteristics of the protest activity: Russian citizens are capable, in response to “stimulative” events, of whipping around and changing their sociopolitical preferences.","PeriodicalId":85546,"journal":{"name":"Sociological research","volume":"57 1","pages":"58 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10610154.2018.1547582","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610154.2018.1547582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Based on material from nationwide surveys conducted by the RAS Institute of Sociology in monitor mode, this article explores the probability that a “revolutionary situation”—an increase in mass protest actions by the “lower classes”—will take shape in present-day Russia. An analysis of the results of a survey conducted in the early spring of 2016 and a comparison of it with previous “waves” of surveys show that in the near term (the next year or two) a “revolutionary situation” will remain only a dangerous specter for Russia—mass protest actions will be merely a potential threat, not a living reality. This is based on the fact that in 2015 there was a moderate level of personal participation in various protest actions. In addition, protest actions today are primarily of an economic nature: People protest mostly against layoffs, price rises, and so on, rather than against the government. A paradox is evident: Many protest against the existing socioeconomic “rules of the game,” but their protest has not been consolidated; the protest against existing political institutions has “leaders” (the liberal opposition), but that protest is much less massive. At the same time, one should take note of a dangerous phenomenon regarding the high volatility of the characteristics of the protest activity: Russian citizens are capable, in response to “stimulative” events, of whipping around and changing their sociopolitical preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“革命形势”的幽灵
基于RAS社会学研究所在监测模式下进行的全国性调查的材料,本文探讨了“革命形势”——“下层阶级”大规模抗议行动的增加——将在当今俄罗斯形成的可能性。对2016年早春进行的一项调查结果进行分析,并将其与之前的“浪潮”调查进行比较,结果表明,在短期内(未来一两年),“革命形势”对俄罗斯来说仍然只是一个危险的幽灵——大规模抗议行动将仅仅是一个潜在的威胁,而不是一个活生生的现实。这是基于这样一个事实,即2015年,在各种抗议行动中,个人参与程度适中。此外,今天的抗议行动主要是经济性质的:人们抗议的主要是裁员、物价上涨等等,而不是反对政府。一个明显的悖论是:许多人抗议现有的社会经济“游戏规则”,但他们的抗议没有得到巩固;对现有政治制度的抗议有“领袖”(自由派反对派),但抗议的规模要小得多。与此同时,人们应该注意到一种危险的现象,即抗议活动特征的高度波动性:俄罗斯公民有能力对“刺激性”事件做出反应,并改变他们的社会政治偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generation Z: Youth Under the Rule of Putin A Study of Russia’s Demographic Problems in the Twenty-First Century The Role of the Geographical Factor in the Formation and Development of Human Potential The Social Functions of a Rural Teacher (on the Example of Altai Krai and the Altai Republic) Russian Parental Values in the Cross-Country Context from 1990–1991 to 2017–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1