Urban Strategic Planning from the Perspective of Well-Being: Evaluation of the Hungarian Practice

IF 0.4 Q4 GEOGRAPHY European Spatial Research and Policy Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI:10.18778/1231-1952.27.1.10
Z. Bajmócy, J. Gébert, György Málovics, B. Berki, J. Juhasz
{"title":"Urban Strategic Planning from the Perspective of Well-Being: Evaluation of the Hungarian Practice","authors":"Z. Bajmócy, J. Gébert, György Málovics, B. Berki, J. Juhasz","doi":"10.18778/1231-1952.27.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper evaluates Hungarian strategic urban planning from the perspective of well-being. It conceptualises well-being in line with Amartya Sen’s capability approach (CA). We argue that the CA provides a meaningful concept of common good or public interest for evaluation. The open-ended nature of CA allows one to embrace the complexity of strategic planning, but it is definite enough to provide a clear normative framework for evaluation. We base our conclusions on 49 interviews with various local actors in three second-tier cities. We conclude that the CA-based evaluation can supplement the dominantly used conformance or performance-based evaluation approaches. We also found that instead of depicting an unachievable ideal state, the CA is able to provide guidance for feasible steps to further well-being.","PeriodicalId":43719,"journal":{"name":"European Spatial Research and Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spatial Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.27.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The present paper evaluates Hungarian strategic urban planning from the perspective of well-being. It conceptualises well-being in line with Amartya Sen’s capability approach (CA). We argue that the CA provides a meaningful concept of common good or public interest for evaluation. The open-ended nature of CA allows one to embrace the complexity of strategic planning, but it is definite enough to provide a clear normative framework for evaluation. We base our conclusions on 49 interviews with various local actors in three second-tier cities. We conclude that the CA-based evaluation can supplement the dominantly used conformance or performance-based evaluation approaches. We also found that instead of depicting an unachievable ideal state, the CA is able to provide guidance for feasible steps to further well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幸福视角下的城市战略规划——对匈牙利实践的评价
本文从幸福的角度评价匈牙利的战略城市规划。它根据Amartya Sen的能力方法(CA)将幸福感概念化。我们认为,CA为评估提供了一个有意义的公共利益或公共利益概念。CA的开放性允许人们接受战略规划的复杂性,但它足够明确,可以为评估提供一个明确的规范框架。我们的结论是基于对三个二线城市不同当地演员的49次采访得出的。我们得出的结论是,基于CA的评估可以补充主要使用的一致性或基于性能的评估方法。我们还发现,CA能够为进一步改善幸福感的可行步骤提供指导,而不是描绘一种无法实现的理想状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Modelling the regional variability of building activity in Greece: A multi-level multinomial logistic regression approach The mapping of forms of spatial planning: An instrument-oriented tool for the international comparison of spatial planning activities Centres and peripheries reflected in distribution patterns of EU cohesion policy funding on the example of the Baranya county, Hungary The future of wellness tourism after COVID-19 AHP and TOPSIS as methods assessing the attractiveness of urban parks: The case of Lodz, Poland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1